[3.0] 9 issues need reviews

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[3.0] 9 issues need reviews

Marcus Denker-4
Hi,

Even with the integrations of saturday, there was a lot done that need
attention:


        https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/filters/22/3-0-Integration

6 are ready to be integrated,
9 need a code review.



(for getting an account at fogbugz, see http://bugs.pharo.org )

        Marcus


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.0] 9 issues need reviews

stephane ducasse
Thanks I will try to allocate time to have a look at them.

Stef

> Hi,
>
> Even with the integrations of saturday, there was a lot done that need
> attention:
>
>
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/filters/22/3-0-Integration
>
> 6 are ready to be integrated,
> 9 need a code review.
>
>
>
> (for getting an account at fogbugz, see http://bugs.pharo.org )
>
> Marcus
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.0] 9 issues need reviews

Marcus Denker-4
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4

On Mar 24, 2013, at 7:23 PM, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Even with the integrations of saturday, there was a lot done that need
> attention:
>
>
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/filters/22/3-0-Integration
>
> 6 are ready to be integrated,
> 9 need a code review.
>
now 15 issues need a review.

        Marcus


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.0] 9 issues need reviews

Marcus Denker-4

On Mar 25, 2013, at 8:29 PM, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> On Mar 24, 2013, at 7:23 PM, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Even with the integrations of saturday, there was a lot done that need
>> attention:
>>
>>
>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/filters/22/3-0-Integration
>>
>> 6 are ready to be integrated,
>> 9 need a code review.
>>
> now 15 issues need a review.
>

now 18 issues need a review.

        Marcus


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.0] 9 issues need reviews

Stéphane Ducasse

On Mar 26, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> On Mar 25, 2013, at 8:29 PM, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 24, 2013, at 7:23 PM, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Even with the integrations of saturday, there was a lot done that need
>>> attention:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/filters/22/3-0-Integration
>>>
>>> 6 are ready to be integrated,
>>> 9 need a code review.
>>>
>> now 15 issues need a review.
>>
>
> now 18 issues need a review.

How do I see them? Because right now I do not see anything just a long list of issues tagged with if time permits.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.0] 9 issues need reviews

Stéphane Ducasse
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4
marcus we should change the first list of bugs because
        - there are far too many options in the filter
        - we should propose a categorisation
        It took me 10 min to find how I can et the list of issue that have been resolved.

Stef

>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Even with the integrations of saturday, there was a lot done that need
>>> attention:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/filters/22/3-0-Integration
>>>
>>> 6 are ready to be integrated,
>>> 9 need a code review.
>>>
>> now 15 issues need a review.
>>
>
> now 18 issues need a review.
>
> Marcus
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.0] 9 issues need reviews

Marcus Denker-4
In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse


now 15 issues need a review.


now 18 issues need a review.

How do I see them? Because right now I do not see anything just a long list of issues tagged with if time permits.

It should look somewhat like this if you follow the link:


Marcus
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.0] 9 issues need reviews

Marcus Denker-4
In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse

On Mar 26, 2013, at 1:56 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:

marcus we should change the first list of bugs because
- there are far too many options in the filter
- we should propose a categorisation
It took me 10 min to find how I can et the list of issue that have been resolved.

For me this is obvious:




Klick on 3.0 Integration, done.

Marcus
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.0] 9 issues need reviews

stephane ducasse
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4
No I can tell you that this is not what I got :)
May be now this is ok but I just add a list with fix it if time allows….

Stf

On Mar 26, 2013, at 1:58 PM, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:

>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> now 15 issues need a review.
>>>>
>>>
>>> now 18 issues need a review.
>>
>> How do I see them? Because right now I do not see anything just a long list of issues tagged with if time permits.
>
> It should look somewhat like this if you follow the link:
>
> <Untitled 3.png>
>
> Marcus