[4.2] image format vs. latest updates (was: Did we break the trunk?)

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[4.2] image format vs. latest updates (was: Did we break the trunk?)

Chris Muller-3
I cannot upgrade a 10779 image using a 2202 Linux VM, however, I can
using a Cog VM.

The possible outcomes for the 4.2 release are:

  a) We release the 10779 image as 4.2.  None of the recent updates
would be included.
  b) We release the 10847 image as 4.2 saved under a Cog VM.  It would
not be able to be launched by the interpreter or older VM's.
  c) Debug it.

Debugging might be difficult since the system is upgrading itself.
Certainly it would be impressive..

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [4.2] image format vs. latest updates (was: Did we break the trunk?)

David T. Lewis
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 09:04:16PM -0600, Chris Muller wrote:
> I cannot upgrade a 10779 image using a 2202 Linux VM, however, I can
> using a Cog VM.
>

Hi Chris,

I just tried downloading the 10779 image from ftp.squeak.org and
ran in on the 4.0.3-2202 VM on Linux, then did an "update code from
server" without problems. What is the problem that are you seeing?

> The possible outcomes for the 4.2 release are:
>
>   a) We release the 10779 image as 4.2.  None of the recent updates
> would be included.
>   b) We release the 10847 image as 4.2 saved under a Cog VM.  It would
> not be able to be launched by the interpreter or older VM's.

Regardless of the version we freeze at, the final release image
should be saved from a standard VM, not from a Cog VM. I can help
with this if the updated standard VM has not released when you need
to take this step.

Dave

>   c) Debug it.
>
> Debugging might be difficult since the system is upgrading itself.
> Certainly it would be impressive..




Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [4.2] image format vs. latest updates (was: Did we break the trunk?)

Chris Muller-3
Hm, it seems to only happen with the 4.0.3-2202 which I compiled
myself.  I tried the downloaded 4.0.3-2202 and it works.  Sorry for
the false alarm.

Thanks..

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:15 PM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 09:04:16PM -0600, Chris Muller wrote:
>> I cannot upgrade a 10779 image using a 2202 Linux VM, however, I can
>> using a Cog VM.
>>
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I just tried downloading the 10779 image from ftp.squeak.org and
> ran in on the 4.0.3-2202 VM on Linux, then did an "update code from
> server" without problems. What is the problem that are you seeing?
>
>> The possible outcomes for the 4.2 release are:
>>
>>   a) We release the 10779 image as 4.2.  None of the recent updates
>> would be included.
>>   b) We release the 10847 image as 4.2 saved under a Cog VM.  It would
>> not be able to be launched by the interpreter or older VM's.
>
> Regardless of the version we freeze at, the final release image
> should be saved from a standard VM, not from a Cog VM. I can help
> with this if the updated standard VM has not released when you need
> to take this step.
>
> Dave
>
>>   c) Debug it.
>>
>> Debugging might be difficult since the system is upgrading itself.
>> Certainly it would be impressive..
>
>
>
>
>