4.1 was one of those great Squeak releases where there were
significant infrastructural improvements. I would like 4.2 to push even further toward the dream of a free, industrial-grade Smalltalk engine. A Smalltalk in which the tools a Smalltalk developer expects to work, work, and work well. But we still have a gap to fill: - Refactoring - Profiling - Efficient finalization and weak-collections As great as 4.1 is, none of these tools are acceptably usable in 4.1, but I have hope for them for 4.2. There has been some recent discussion around wrapping some ToolBuilder views around the RB engine. Andreas _seemed_ to indicate the profiling issue is not seriously difficult to fix and, finally, I have been working with Igor on his finalization and weak-collection fixes that I will report on soon. I'm also very excited about the recent interest in SqueakMap; that it could potentially be freshened and become a "go-to" place for easy, convenient in-image software exploration, accompanied by documentation. And, the current HelpSystem documentation effort is just the icing on the cake. In summary, a free, industrial-grade Smalltalk engine, advanced developer tools, documention and loaded with cool working demos. This is my dream for what I would think would make a fantastic 4.2 release, what do you think? |
+1
----- Original Message ---- From: Chris Muller <[hidden email]> To: squeak dev <[hidden email]> Sent: Fri, May 14, 2010 1:35:43 PM Subject: [squeak-dev] 4.2 wish list 4.1 was one of those great Squeak releases where there were significant infrastructural improvements. I would like 4.2 to push even further toward the dream of a free, industrial-grade Smalltalk engine. A Smalltalk in which the tools a Smalltalk developer expects to work, work, and work well. But we still have a gap to fill: - Refactoring - Profiling - Efficient finalization and weak-collections As great as 4.1 is, none of these tools are acceptably usable in 4.1, but I have hope for them for 4.2. There has been some recent discussion around wrapping some ToolBuilder views around the RB engine. Andreas _seemed_ to indicate the profiling issue is not seriously difficult to fix and, finally, I have been working with Igor on his finalization and weak-collection fixes that I will report on soon. I'm also very excited about the recent interest in SqueakMap; that it could potentially be freshened and become a "go-to" place for easy, convenient in-image software exploration, accompanied by documentation. And, the current HelpSystem documentation effort is just the icing on the cake. In summary, a free, industrial-grade Smalltalk engine, advanced developer tools, documention and loaded with cool working demos. This is my dream for what I would think would make a fantastic 4.2 release, what do you think? |
In reply to this post by Chris Muller-5
On 5/14/10, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote:
> 4.1 was one of those great Squeak releases where there were > significant infrastructural improvements. I would like 4.2 to push > even further toward the dream of a free, industrial-grade Smalltalk > engine. A Smalltalk in which the tools a Smalltalk developer expects > to work, work, and work well. But we still have a gap to fill: > > - Refactoring May be ready soon to be ticked off.... Colin Putney published a configuration which loads the OmniBrowser with Refactoring into Squeak4.1 trunk. He asks us to try it out. http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2010-May/150710.html The configuration file which loads it is in the Inbox http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Configurations-cwp.1.mcz I loaded it out today - user level testing is needed now http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2010-May/150722.html (Contains the very short load information) --Hannes > - Profiling > - Efficient finalization and weak-collections > > As great as 4.1 is, none of these tools are acceptably usable in 4.1, > but I have hope for them for 4.2. There has been some recent > discussion around wrapping some ToolBuilder views around the RB > engine. Andreas _seemed_ to indicate the profiling issue is not > seriously difficult to fix and, finally, I have been working with Igor > on his finalization and weak-collection fixes that I will report on > soon. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |