A Layered Grammar of Graphics
Locked
A Layered Grammar of Graphics
 
|
Hi Moosers,
this paper might be interesting to some of you: @Article{layered-grammar, author = {Hadley Wickham}, doi = {10.1198/jcgs.2009.07098}, journal = {Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics}, number = {1}, pages = {3–28}, selected = {TRUE}, title = {A layered grammar of graphics}, volume = {19}, year = {2010}, } http://vita.had.co.nz/papers/layered-grammar.html I was wondering if Graph-ET (or EyeSee before) is close to this compositional approach ? Apparently at the moment, there is no interaction in this work (compare to Graph-ET). Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: A Layered Grammar of Graphics
|
|
I'll take a look asap.
------------------------UNRELATED-------------------------- I've been having a lot of feedback here in ESUG, and I'll work on the next few things: -> A LOT of people asked me for a client-side aplication for Graph-ET. Currently Pablo Estefó is porting Roassal to Amber, so when he is done, porting Graph-ET should be a piece of cake. -> The axis labels are not as smart as EyeSee's, so sometimes they are a little bit uncomfortable, this should be fixed soon. -> GET already can be ported to SVG, HTML and PNG and preserve the Roassal interactions, we'll work on a PDF exporter soon. -> I'm already working on adding animation, it's pretty naive for now, but you can take a look if you load the last version of GET, there's 2 animation examples, it only works for the barDiagrams so far. --------------------------UNRELATED-------------------------- -Daniel > From: [hidden email] > Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 10:54:13 +0200 > To: [hidden email] > Subject: [Moose-dev] A Layered Grammar of Graphics > > Hi Moosers, > > this paper might be interesting to some of you: > > @Article{layered-grammar, > author = {Hadley Wickham}, > doi = {10.1198/jcgs.2009.07098}, > journal = {Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics}, > number = {1}, > pages = {3–28}, > selected = {TRUE}, > title = {A layered grammar of graphics}, > volume = {19}, > year = {2010}, > } > > http://vita.had.co.nz/papers/layered-grammar.html > > I was wondering if Graph-ET (or EyeSee before) is close to this > compositional approach ? Apparently at the moment, there is no > interaction in this work (compare to Graph-ET). > > Regards, > -- > Serge Stinckwich > UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) > Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk > http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by SergeStinckwich
Hi Serge,
THANK you! Indeed, GraphET is lined up very much with such work. I was not aware of this journal, and it has a nice impact factor. Cheers, Alexandre On Sep 12, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Moosers, > > this paper might be interesting to some of you: > > @Article{layered-grammar, > author = {Hadley Wickham}, > doi = {10.1198/jcgs.2009.07098}, > journal = {Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics}, > number = {1}, > pages = {3–28}, > selected = {TRUE}, > title = {A layered grammar of graphics}, > volume = {19}, > year = {2010}, > } > > http://vita.had.co.nz/papers/layered-grammar.html > > I was wondering if Graph-ET (or EyeSee before) is close to this > compositional approach ? Apparently at the moment, there is no > interaction in this work (compare to Graph-ET). > > Regards, > -- > Serge Stinckwich > UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) > Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk > http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: A Layered Grammar of Graphics
|
|
In reply to this post by Daniel Aviv Notario
Hi Daniel,
No need to be in hurry to read the paper. You have already done an impressive work ;-) We are using EyeSee for the visualization of epidemiological models, we will switch to Graph-ET latter. Regards, On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Daniel Aviv Notario <[hidden email]> wrote: > I'll take a look asap. > > ------------------------UNRELATED-------------------------- > I've been having a lot of feedback here in ESUG, and I'll work on the next > few things: > > -> A LOT of people asked me for a client-side aplication for Graph-ET. > Currently Pablo Estefó is porting Roassal to Amber, so when he is done, > porting Graph-ET should be a piece of cake. > > -> The axis labels are not as smart as EyeSee's, so sometimes they are a > little bit uncomfortable, this should be fixed soon. > > -> GET already can be ported to SVG, HTML and PNG and preserve the Roassal > interactions, we'll work on a PDF exporter soon. > > -> I'm already working on adding animation, it's pretty naive for now, but > you can take a look if you load the last version of GET, there's 2 animation > examples, it only works for the barDiagrams so far. > --------------------------UNRELATED-------------------------- > > -Daniel > >> From: [hidden email] >> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 10:54:13 +0200 >> To: [hidden email] >> Subject: [Moose-dev] A Layered Grammar of Graphics > >> >> Hi Moosers, >> >> this paper might be interesting to some of you: >> >> @Article{layered-grammar, >> author = {Hadley Wickham}, >> doi = {10.1198/jcgs.2009.07098}, >> journal = {Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics}, >> number = {1}, >> pages = {3–28}, >> selected = {TRUE}, >> title = {A layered grammar of graphics}, >> volume = {19}, >> year = {2010}, >> } >> >> http://vita.had.co.nz/papers/layered-grammar.html >> >> I was wondering if Graph-ET (or EyeSee before) is close to this >> compositional approach ? Apparently at the moment, there is no >> interaction in this work (compare to Graph-ET). >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Serge Stinckwich >> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) >> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk >> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
> We are using EyeSee for the visualization of epidemiological models,
> we will switch to Graph-ET latter. The cost of switching should be negligible. It depends what you are using from EyeSee Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
«
Return to Moose
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |