Hi all,
-- I am still getting my way around installing packages in Pharo. Just a few questions:
Thanks a lot, Alexey You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Hi alexey
Yes you can use Pharo 40. In fact we always test on both. I will remove this test because a test randomly failing is a pain. Now Pharo 50 is better to me.
PolyMath is a fork and separate version I just publish the configuration into the configurationBrowser for 40 and 50. Now better use the PharoLauncher https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNim2Yxs320 http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/PharoLauncher - I use it all the time - you can find the ci job of jenkins under the Pharo contribution polymath. - if you download the latest job version you can use recreate menu item on item in the left list to always redownload the latest version Prefer to use the stable because in the dev version sometimes nothing works :) For example I have problems with the current dev configurations and not be able to understand the problem since a couple of hours. In pharo we have an inbox and I created an inbox where you can publish your changes. then send a mail and we will have a look and integrate them. Stef
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by Alexey Cherkaev
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Alexey Cherkaev
<[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi all, Hi Alexey, > I am still getting my way around installing packages in Pharo. Just a few > questions: > > Can I use Pharo 4, or should I use Pharo 5? I've seen on Jenkins, PolyMath > passes all the tests on both (or all but one on Pharo 4), so I guess it's > non essential. I'm using Pharo 5.0 most of the time now. There is some bugs from time to time, but the platform is quite stable. > So far, I can install SciSmalltalk via Tools -> Configuration Browser. I > don't see PolyMath there. Is SciSmalltalk and PolyMath are still the same > thing? How do I get the development branch? PolyMath is just the new name of SciSmalltalk. Stéphane is doing a massive refactoring in order to change the name. For the moment, you can use the old version and you use the new one, when Stéphane finish the renaming. > And with the last question comes: how do I make pull requests? I can't seem > to find git repository or something similar (and I guess, familiar :) ). We don't use github for the moment. We will use it when the git tools with Pharo will be more mature. We are using SmalltalkHub here: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~SergeStinckwich/SciSmalltalk If you want to commit, you need an ID and send me your ID. Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
>> I am still getting my way around installing packages in Pharo. Just a few >> questions: >> >> Can I use Pharo 4, or should I use Pharo 5? I've seen on Jenkins, PolyMath >> passes all the tests on both (or all but one on Pharo 4), so I guess it's >> non essential. > I'm using Pharo 5.0 most of the time now. There is some bugs from time > to time, but the platform is quite stable. > >> So far, I can install SciSmalltalk via Tools -> Configuration Browser. I >> don't see PolyMath there. Is SciSmalltalk and PolyMath are still the same >> thing? How do I get the development branch? > PolyMath is just the new name of SciSmalltalk. Stéphane is doing a > massive refactoring in order to change the name. Not just that :) Cleaning all the code and making it modular. > For the moment, you can use the old version and you use the new one, > when Stéphane finish the renaming. You can use Polymath I finished the first pass on ODE and the tests. > >> And with the last question comes: how do I make pull requests? I can't seem >> to find git repository or something similar (and I guess, familiar :) ). > We don't use github for the moment. We will use it when the git tools > with Pharo will be more mature. > > We are using SmalltalkHub here: > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~SergeStinckwich/SciSmalltalk > If you want to commit, you need an ID and send me your ID. No please commit to Polymath and other people that me should be able to help. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:20 AM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>> I am still getting my way around installing packages in Pharo. Just a few >>> questions: >>> >>> Can I use Pharo 4, or should I use Pharo 5? I've seen on Jenkins, >>> PolyMath >>> passes all the tests on both (or all but one on Pharo 4), so I guess it's >>> non essential. >> >> I'm using Pharo 5.0 most of the time now. There is some bugs from time >> to time, but the platform is quite stable. >> >>> So far, I can install SciSmalltalk via Tools -> Configuration Browser. I >>> don't see PolyMath there. Is SciSmalltalk and PolyMath are still the same >>> thing? How do I get the development branch? >> >> PolyMath is just the new name of SciSmalltalk. Stéphane is doing a >> massive refactoring in order to change the name. > > > Not just that :) > Cleaning all the code and making it modular. Ok , great :-) Can we share the load ? Put on the issue tracker: https://github.com/SergeStinckwich/SciSmalltalk/issues the packages you are working on in order avoid duplicates efforts. >> >> For the moment, you can use the old version and you use the new one, >> when Stéphane finish the renaming. > > You can use Polymath I finished the first pass on ODE and the tests. Ok, better :-) -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Cleaning all the code and making it modular. > Ok , great :-) > Can we share the load ? yes! > Put on the issue tracker: > https://github.com/SergeStinckwich/SciSmalltalk/issues > the packages you are working on in order avoid duplicates efforts. ok I will use that. I got stuck with the definition of the 33 baseline so I revert dev to .32 I will see how I can avoid losing the etxraction of Matrix out of DHB-Numerical For now, I will stop for this week because I have to prepare pharodays and other important meetings. When I will restart I will focus on random and distribution This evening I will try to just package all the tests about matrix first into one place. Stef > >>> For the moment, you can use the old version and you use the new one, >>> when Stéphane finish the renaming. >> You can use Polymath I finished the first pass on ODE and the tests. > Ok, better :-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by stepharo
Hi Stef, Thanks for the reply! As it appears, on Ubuntu I've been using the Launcher right from the start. But I couldn't find Pharo Contribution - just had to refresh the list (putting it out here in case someone like me get stuck at that point:) ). I have downloaded job #24 stable (as you have recommended). For the Pharo Inbox: are these http://pharo.org/contribute-propose-fix right instructions? I have developed a line search method (I haven't seen it in PolyMath) and I'm going to add it to Newton's method DhbNewtonZeroFinder (to ensure global convergence) together with the test case to test the inbox. I just need to reorganise it in terms of DhbFunctionalIterator. Best regards, Alexey On 28 March 2016 at 10:11, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Le 28/3/16 11:07, Alexey Cherkaev a
écrit :
:) Good
Not Pharo :) Polymath inbox Now serge can add you to the team.
Ok publish it in the PolyMathInbox and serge can merge. Then after a while you can just commit directly.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by Alexey Cherkaev
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Alexey Cherkaev
<[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Stef, > > Thanks for the reply! As it appears, on Ubuntu I've been using the Launcher > right from the start. But I couldn't find Pharo Contribution - just had to > refresh the list (putting it out here in case someone like me get stuck at > that point:) ). > > I have downloaded job #24 stable (as you have recommended). You have to use PolyMath not SciSmalltalk jobs. Apparently last version on CI is #19 > For the Pharo Inbox: are these http://pharo.org/contribute-propose-fix right > instructions? I have developed a line search method (I haven't seen it in > PolyMath) and I'm going to add it to Newton's method DhbNewtonZeroFinder (to > ensure global convergence) together with the test case to test the inbox. I > just need to reorganise it in terms of DhbFunctionalIterator. Stéphane just create an inbox for PolyMath here: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~PolyMath/PolyMathInbox You have to put your code here. -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Hi Serge,
-- On 28 March 2016 at 11:14, Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]> wrote: On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Alexey Cherkaev Ok, got it: #19 appears outside of "all builds" and I couldn't understand why "all builds" would go up to #24. > For the Pharo Inbox: are these http://pharo.org/contribute-propose-fix right I see Monticello registration (public write access) snippet there. I guess I can use that? Just in case, my ID on Smalltalkhub is MobiusEng. -- Cheers, Alexey You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Le 28/3/16 11:24, Alexey Cherkaev a
écrit :
I do not know why but over the week-end the win slave got stuck and I have no idea why. (Oh yes I have some ideas.... because we always got trouble with win slaves). Stef
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by Alexey Cherkaev
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Alexey Cherkaev
<[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Serge, > > On 28 March 2016 at 11:14, Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]> > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Alexey Cherkaev >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > Hi Stef, >> > >> > Thanks for the reply! As it appears, on Ubuntu I've been using the >> > Launcher >> > right from the start. But I couldn't find Pharo Contribution - just had >> > to >> > refresh the list (putting it out here in case someone like me get stuck >> > at >> > that point:) ). >> > >> > I have downloaded job #24 stable (as you have recommended). >> >> You have to use PolyMath not SciSmalltalk jobs. >> Apparently last version on CI is #19 >> > > Ok, got it: #19 appears outside of "all builds" and I couldn't understand > why "all builds" would go up to #24. Apparently all Jenkins jobs are stucked ... -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |