On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Alexandre Bergel
<[hidden email]> wrote: > I have not tried, but can you compile methods? Not yet. |
Looks like an important step in my opinion.
Keep pushing:-) Cheers, Alexandre > On Sep 23, 2015, at 6:04 AM, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Alexandre Bergel > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> I have not tried, but can you compile methods? > > Not yet. > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. |
In reply to this post by Peter Uhnak
On 23-09-15 11:04, Peter Uhnák wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Alexandre Bergel > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> I have not tried, but can you compile methods? > > Not yet. Would be great if someone would take a look. I'm probably doing something silly. Added support for mouse based column manipulation When navigating, I opens a spotter on implementors (not yet the right one) and adds a card (not yet in the right position) Stephan Screenshot from 2015-09-23 18:14:29.png (62K) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by Peter Uhnak
On 23-09-15 03:21, Peter Uhnák wrote:
> aMorph passenger do: [ :each | > each isClass ifTrue: [ > each methods do: [ :method | > self addMorph: (CodeCard class: method methodClass > selector: method selector) > ] > ]. > each isCompiledMethod ifTrue: [ > self addMorph: (CodeCard class: each methodClass > selector: each selector) > ] > ] Takes 14 seconds with Morph, and the result is not exactly usable. For the method category, I suppose I can ask the TransferMorph for the dragSource which I can ask for the currrent selection to find out which class is meant. Stephan |
In reply to this post by philippeback
I second Phil's argument on the main problem being the lack of
consistency of shorcuts between platforms and contexts. Ctrl+c,
Ctrl+v is the most felt one, particularly on apps that use GT
toolkit. Seeing Stephan experiments' is inspiring.
Cheers, Offray On 21/09/15 15:29, [hidden email]
wrote:
|
In reply to this post by Peter Uhnak
Peter, Could you share a link to a bigger screenshot of your
workflow with code cards? Just curious about this feature.
Thanks, Offray On 21/09/15 19:21, Peter Uhnák wrote:
|
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hmm, what email client are you using? Because the image was not resized. world.st shows the image downscaled http://forum.world.st/A-keyboard-controlled-code-editor-how-difficult-would-that-be-td4851368.html but if you right-click and "open image in new tab" it is in original size, the same for the actual record in the mailing list http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-users_lists.pharo.org/2015-September/021775.html at the end of the email there are links to attachments http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-users_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20150922/96271b9b/attachment-0001.png And finally gmail shows the image also downscaled, but I can simply click on it to show it enlarged. So if you see the image small, blame your mail client. :) (and click the link above) Peter |
Thanks Peter, seems a problem related with thunderbird. I will see
what's happening. Cheers,
Offray On 28/09/15 09:55, Peter Uhnák wrote:
|
As for changing/updating the code in the cards... maybe we can look at MessageBrowser because it should have all the necessary behavior. Peter On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
On 29-09-15 01:28, Peter Uhnák wrote:
> As for changing/updating the code in the cards... > > maybe we can look at MessageBrowser because it should have all the > necessary behavior. That is difficult. MessageBrowser uses Spec, so there are some abstractions in the way. Do you know if RubMethodEditingExample ever worked to commit? It does not now. Stephan |
> MessageBrowser uses Spec, so there are some abstractions in the way. Do you know if RubMethodEditingExample ever worked to commit? I have no idea (and very limited Rubric/Morphic knowledge). But if it worked before it should be reported as bug to the tracker? Is there a reason why this is not in the catalog browser? Do you feel it's not production-ready (missing editing)? Because I am very happy consumer even in this state. :) Peter On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Stephan Eggermont <[hidden email]> wrote: On 29-09-15 01:28, Peter Uhnák wrote: |
On 05-10-15 21:11, Peter Uhnák wrote:
> Is there a reason why this is not in the catalog browser? Do you feel it's > not production-ready (missing editing)? Because I am very happy consumer > even in this state. :) I'll add a configuration as soon as editing works and the spotter improvements make it to Pharo 5. It is just very much a prototype. Some parts I like, others not so much, and a lot has not gotten much thought. Stephan |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |