https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/27479/PharoCore-1.1.1.zip -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
On 12 Sep 2010, at 12:02, Marcus Denker wrote: > https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/27479/PharoCore-1.1.1.zip The images inside are 11414 but the filenames say otherwise: $ unzip -l ~/Downloads/PharoCore-1.1.1.zip Archive: /Users/sven/Downloads/PharoCore-1.1.1.zip Length Date Time Name -------- ---- ---- ---- 0 09-12-10 11:58 PharoCore-1.1.1/ 8242224 09-12-10 11:58 PharoCore-1.1.1/PharoCore-1.1-11411.changes 14285724 09-12-10 11:58 PharoCore-1.1.1/PharoCore-1.1-11411.image 16235372 10-19-09 17:02 PharoCore-1.1.1/PharoV10.sources -------- ------- 38763320 4 files A bit confusing and probably not the intention. Will the official 'stable' link move to this one too (or did it already) ? Sven _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > On 12 Sep 2010, at 12:02, Marcus Denker wrote: > >> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/27479/PharoCore-1.1.1.zip > > The images inside are 11414 but the filenames say otherwise: > Uhh.... I will redo it. There are two other fixes I missed, too. > > Will the official 'stable' link move to this one too (or did it already) ? > No, this will be done as soon as we have a full image, too. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
I am already re-building everything on Hudson with this image.
Hopefully things go well. One-click images will use Cog. Lukas On 18 September 2010 09:58, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote: > > On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > >> >> On 12 Sep 2010, at 12:02, Marcus Denker wrote: >> >>> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/27479/PharoCore-1.1.1.zip >> >> The images inside are 11414 but the filenames say otherwise: >> > Uhh.... I will redo it. > > There are two other fixes I missed, too. > >> >> Will the official 'stable' link move to this one too (or did it already) ? >> > > No, this will be done as soon as we have a full image, too. > > Marcus > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
On 18 Sep 2010, at 10:09, Lukas Renggli wrote: > I am already re-building everything on Hudson with this image. > Hopefully things go well. One-click images will use Cog. > > Lukas Yeah, I was doing the same locally using your builder scripts ;-) Works very nice. With this image we should be able to use Cog for the whole build process as well, no ? Hopefully with some good speedup. > On 18 September 2010 09:58, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> >>> >>> On 12 Sep 2010, at 12:02, Marcus Denker wrote: >>> >>>> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/27479/PharoCore-1.1.1.zip >>> >>> The images inside are 11414 but the filenames say otherwise: >>> >> Uhh.... I will redo it. >> >> There are two other fixes I missed, too. >> >>> >>> Will the official 'stable' link move to this one too (or did it already) ? >>> >> >> No, this will be done as soon as we have a full image, too. >> >> Marcus >> >> -- >> Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de >> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
>> I am already re-building everything on Hudson with this image.
>> Hopefully things go well. One-click images will use Cog. >> >> Lukas > > Yeah, I was doing the same locally using your builder scripts ;-) > Works very nice. > > With this image we should be able to use Cog for the whole build process as well, no ? > Hopefully with some good speedup. Indeed that should speed up building the images considerably. For now I will continue to use the old VM for building though, so that the resulting images can be opened with Cog and traditional VMs. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
I like the idea of continuing to use the old images because this should be good for identifying bottlenecks. :)
On Sep 18, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: >>> I am already re-building everything on Hudson with this image. >>> Hopefully things go well. One-click images will use Cog. >>> >>> Lukas >> >> Yeah, I was doing the same locally using your builder scripts ;-) >> Works very nice. >> >> With this image we should be able to use Cog for the whole build process as well, no ? >> Hopefully with some good speedup. > > Indeed that should speed up building the images considerably. For now > I will continue to use the old VM for building though, so that the > resulting images can be opened with Cog and traditional VMs. > > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Lukas Renggli
Ok, all images have been successfully rebuilt.
The only thing I noticed (apart from the massive speedup in the one-click images) is that the 'Test Coverage' button in the test runner is not disabled. I thought that Mariano fixed that? Lukas On 18 September 2010 10:09, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]> wrote: > I am already re-building everything on Hudson with this image. > Hopefully things go well. One-click images will use Cog. > > Lukas > > On 18 September 2010 09:58, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> >>> >>> On 12 Sep 2010, at 12:02, Marcus Denker wrote: >>> >>>> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/27479/PharoCore-1.1.1.zip >>> >>> The images inside are 11414 but the filenames say otherwise: >>> >> Uhh.... I will redo it. >> >> There are two other fixes I missed, too. >> >>> >>> Will the official 'stable' link move to this one too (or did it already) ? >>> >> >> No, this will be done as soon as we have a full image, too. >> >> Marcus >> >> -- >> Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de >> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Lukas Renggli
Lukas,
Excellent! That was my first concern when I saw that Cog would appear in one-click images. But having an easy way to see Cog in action will be most welcome. I have access to a couple of Atom based machines that might be especially revealing. I will also be doing some heavy number crunching soon. Most of the heavy lifting happens (mercifully) in GSL, PLplot and a .so I wrote, but there will still be a lot of "glue" and I/O that might benefit from Cog. That said, I am not quite ready to take a one-way plunge into Cog. Perhaps the answer is to get ready for the batch and then convert the image at the last minute. Bill ________________________________________ From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli [[hidden email]] Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 6:44 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1 >> I am already re-building everything on Hudson with this image. >> Hopefully things go well. One-click images will use Cog. >> >> Lukas > > Yeah, I was doing the same locally using your builder scripts ;-) > Works very nice. > > With this image we should be able to use Cog for the whole build process as well, no ? > Hopefully with some good speedup. Indeed that should speed up building the images considerably. For now I will continue to use the old VM for building though, so that the resulting images can be opened with Cog and traditional VMs. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Lukas Renggli
Lukas,
Are the files visible yet? Two places I would think to look are: https://Pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/ Your Hudson server shows a recent build (no Shout, core maybe?), but I am curious about the effects of Cog, and I don't see (or don't know where to look for) it. Bill ________________________________________ From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli [[hidden email]] Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 10:19 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1 Ok, all images have been successfully rebuilt. The only thing I noticed (apart from the massive speedup in the one-click images) is that the 'Test Coverage' button in the test runner is not disabled. I thought that Mariano fixed that? Lukas On 18 September 2010 10:09, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]> wrote: > I am already re-building everything on Hudson with this image. > Hopefully things go well. One-click images will use Cog. > > Lukas > > On 18 September 2010 09:58, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> >>> >>> On 12 Sep 2010, at 12:02, Marcus Denker wrote: >>> >>>> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/27479/PharoCore-1.1.1.zip >>> >>> The images inside are 11414 but the filenames say otherwise: >>> >> Uhh.... I will redo it. >> >> There are two other fixes I missed, too. >> >>> >>> Will the official 'stable' link move to this one too (or did it already) ? >>> >> >> No, this will be done as soon as we have a full image, too. >> >> Marcus >> >> -- >> Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de >> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
> http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/
All the one-click distributions include the cog VM for Linux, Windows, and Mac. I don't know if other Hudson servers have been updated and rebuilt yet. I prepared the updated code during ESUG and it is on github. Lukas > > Your Hudson server shows a recent build (no Shout, core maybe?), but I am curious about the effects of Cog, and I don't see (or don't know where to look for) it. > > Bill > > > ________________________________________ > From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli [[hidden email]] > Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 10:19 AM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1 > > Ok, all images have been successfully rebuilt. > > The only thing I noticed (apart from the massive speedup in the > one-click images) is that the 'Test Coverage' button in the test > runner is not disabled. I thought that Mariano fixed that? > > Lukas > > On 18 September 2010 10:09, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]> wrote: >> I am already re-building everything on Hudson with this image. >> Hopefully things go well. One-click images will use Cog. >> >> Lukas >> >> On 18 September 2010 09:58, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 12 Sep 2010, at 12:02, Marcus Denker wrote: >>>> >>>>> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/27479/PharoCore-1.1.1.zip >>>> >>>> The images inside are 11414 but the filenames say otherwise: >>>> >>> Uhh.... I will redo it. >>> >>> There are two other fixes I missed, too. >>> >>>> >>>> Will the official 'stable' link move to this one too (or did it already) ? >>>> >>> >>> No, this will be done as soon as we have a full image, too. >>> >>> Marcus >>> >>> -- >>> Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de >>> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Lukas Renggli >> www.lukas-renggli.ch >> > > > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Lukas,
I don't quite get the Hudson web interface yet. Pharo seemed like the place to go, but maybe it's the core? Then downstream of that are Development and others - that looks like it - hidden right under my nose :) But now I arguably have the problem of seeing only a one-click for Pharo dev and Seaside. Are they Cog-only images? Bill ________________________________________ From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli [[hidden email]] Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 12:05 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1 > http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/ All the one-click distributions include the cog VM for Linux, Windows, and Mac. I don't know if other Hudson servers have been updated and rebuilt yet. I prepared the updated code during ESUG and it is on github. Lukas > > Your Hudson server shows a recent build (no Shout, core maybe?), but I am curious about the effects of Cog, and I don't see (or don't know where to look for) it. > > Bill > > > ________________________________________ > From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli [[hidden email]] > Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 10:19 AM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1 > > Ok, all images have been successfully rebuilt. > > The only thing I noticed (apart from the massive speedup in the > one-click images) is that the 'Test Coverage' button in the test > runner is not disabled. I thought that Mariano fixed that? > > Lukas > > On 18 September 2010 10:09, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]> wrote: >> I am already re-building everything on Hudson with this image. >> Hopefully things go well. One-click images will use Cog. >> >> Lukas >> >> On 18 September 2010 09:58, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 12 Sep 2010, at 12:02, Marcus Denker wrote: >>>> >>>>> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/27479/PharoCore-1.1.1.zip >>>> >>>> The images inside are 11414 but the filenames say otherwise: >>>> >>> Uhh.... I will redo it. >>> >>> There are two other fixes I missed, too. >>> >>>> >>>> Will the official 'stable' link move to this one too (or did it already) ? >>>> >>> >>> No, this will be done as soon as we have a full image, too. >>> >>> Marcus >>> >>> -- >>> Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de >>> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Lukas Renggli >> www.lukas-renggli.ch >> > > > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
On 18 Sep 2010, at 18:28, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > I don't quite get the Hudson web interface yet. Pharo seemed like the place to go, but maybe it's the core? Then downstream of that are Development and others - that looks like it - hidden right under my nose :) But now I arguably have the problem of seeing only a one-click for Pharo dev and Seaside. Are they Cog-only images? Goto http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/job/Development/ or http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/job/Seaside%203.0/ and download the xxx-OneClick.zip artifact. Sven _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Right, and thanks, but the question is whether or not we have switched over to Cog? Lukas mentioned the one-click images built quickly. Compared to what? Are their non-Cog versions of these images?
________________________________________ From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Sven Van Caekenberghe [[hidden email]] Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 12:43 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1 On 18 Sep 2010, at 18:28, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > I don't quite get the Hudson web interface yet. Pharo seemed like the place to go, but maybe it's the core? Then downstream of that are Development and others - that looks like it - hidden right under my nose :) But now I arguably have the problem of seeing only a one-click for Pharo dev and Seaside. Are they Cog-only images? Goto http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/job/Development/ or http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/job/Seaside%203.0/ and download the xxx-OneClick.zip artifact. Sven _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
> Right, and thanks, but the question is whether or not we have switched over to Cog? Lukas mentioned the one-click images built quickly. Compared to what? Are their non-Cog versions of these images?
None of the images are Cog images, this is just that the one-click distributions include the Cog VM. The images can be opened with both VMs until you save it with a Cog VM for the first time. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Lukas,
That's great, and I thought I had read that. But something else you wrote made me doubt that; I must have confused a comment on the speed of the one-clicks at runtime as a statement that they built quickly thanks to Cog (which would make them Cog images). Bill ________________________________________ From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli [[hidden email]] Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 2:07 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1 > Right, and thanks, but the question is whether or not we have switched over to Cog? Lukas mentioned the one-click images built quickly. Compared to what? Are their non-Cog versions of these images? None of the images are Cog images, this is just that the one-click distributions include the Cog VM. The images can be opened with both VMs until you save it with a Cog VM for the first time. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
No the images are built exactly the same way as before.
I am looking forward being able to use Cog to build images in the future. Loading Monticello packages is considerably faster with the new VM. For now I don't use the Cog VM on the build server, also because I cannot do coverage analysis with it. Lukas On 18 September 2010 20:20, Schwab,Wilhelm K <[hidden email]> wrote: > Lukas, > > That's great, and I thought I had read that. But something else you wrote made me doubt that; I must have confused a comment on the speed of the one-clicks at runtime as a statement that they built quickly thanks to Cog (which would make them Cog images). > > Bill > > > ________________________________________ > From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli [[hidden email]] > Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 2:07 PM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1 > >> Right, and thanks, but the question is whether or not we have switched over to Cog? Lukas mentioned the one-click images built quickly. Compared to what? Are their non-Cog versions of these images? > > None of the images are Cog images, this is just that the one-click > distributions include the Cog VM. The images can be opened with both > VMs until you save it with a Cog VM for the first time. > > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Lukas,
Clearly you have tried Cog for making images :) How much faster is it? Bill ________________________________________ From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli [[hidden email]] Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 2:32 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1 No the images are built exactly the same way as before. I am looking forward being able to use Cog to build images in the future. Loading Monticello packages is considerably faster with the new VM. For now I don't use the Cog VM on the build server, also because I cannot do coverage analysis with it. Lukas On 18 September 2010 20:20, Schwab,Wilhelm K <[hidden email]> wrote: > Lukas, > > That's great, and I thought I had read that. But something else you wrote made me doubt that; I must have confused a comment on the speed of the one-clicks at runtime as a statement that they built quickly thanks to Cog (which would make them Cog images). > > Bill > > > ________________________________________ > From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli [[hidden email]] > Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 2:07 PM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1 > >> Right, and thanks, but the question is whether or not we have switched over to Cog? Lukas mentioned the one-click images built quickly. Compared to what? Are their non-Cog versions of these images? > > None of the images are Cog images, this is just that the one-click > distributions include the Cog VM. The images can be opened with both > VMs until you save it with a Cog VM for the first time. > > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
I have not tested it with the Hudson build scripts, but loading
packages, compiling code, running tests and code critics feels massively faster. Lukas On 18 September 2010 20:38, Schwab,Wilhelm K <[hidden email]> wrote: > Lukas, > > Clearly you have tried Cog for making images :) How much faster is it? > > Bill > > > ________________________________________ > From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli [[hidden email]] > Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 2:32 PM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1 > > No the images are built exactly the same way as before. > > I am looking forward being able to use Cog to build images in the > future. Loading Monticello packages is considerably faster with the > new VM. For now I don't use the Cog VM on the build server, also > because I cannot do coverage analysis with it. > > Lukas > > On 18 September 2010 20:20, Schwab,Wilhelm K <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Lukas, >> >> That's great, and I thought I had read that. But something else you wrote made me doubt that; I must have confused a comment on the speed of the one-clicks at runtime as a statement that they built quickly thanks to Cog (which would make them Cog images). >> >> Bill >> >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli [[hidden email]] >> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 2:07 PM >> To: [hidden email] >> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1 >> >>> Right, and thanks, but the question is whether or not we have switched over to Cog? Lukas mentioned the one-click images built quickly. Compared to what? Are their non-Cog versions of these images? >> >> None of the images are Cog images, this is just that the one-click >> distributions include the Cog VM. The images can be opened with both >> VMs until you save it with a Cog VM for the first time. >> >> Lukas >> >> -- >> Lukas Renggli >> www.lukas-renggli.ch >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Lukas Renggli
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]> wrote: Ok, all images have been successfully rebuilt. No :( Stef integrated a change that solves the tests (doing a check if it is running in cog and if true just do a fail). This way at least we can run the test, mark them as fail and do not crash. Now...it would be nice to integrate a change that disable the option to do a TestCoverage or to raise a popup saying "TestCoverage is not supported in Cog yet" or something like that. Otherwise, final users will try to run coverage and vm will crash. I don't know anything about Mprhic, so I have no idea how to do that, otherwise I would have already done it. Cheers Mariano
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |