[ANN] 10337

> Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
>> issue 884: Bookmorph removal. Thanks alain!
>>
> I think that something was wrong because BookMorph is still present
> after #10337.
>
> regarding SqueakPage removal. It seems to me that ObjectOut and
> MorphObjectOut would not be fonctional at all after
> SqueakPage and SqueakPageCache removal.
> I would remove all of this.
> (and in the case someone want to make it revive, it isn't lost)

>
> alain
>> Stef
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>

> Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
>> issue 884: Bookmorph removal. Thanks alain!
>>
> I think that something was wrong because BookMorph is still present
> after #10337.
>
> regarding SqueakPage removal. It seems to me that ObjectOut and
> MorphObjectOut would not be fonctional at all after
> SqueakPage and SqueakPageCache removal.
> I would remove all of this.
> (and in the case someone want to make it revive, it isn't lost)
>
> alain
>> Stef
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>

> Stef
>
> On Jun 13, 2009, at 10:39 PM, Alain Plantec wrote:
>
>> Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
>>> issue 884: Bookmorph removal. Thanks alain!
>>>
>> I think that something was wrong because BookMorph is still present
>> after #10337.
>>
>
>

> Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
>> can you check ?
>> because book~LikeMorph and bookMorph in 320 were not in the same
>> hierarchy anymore.
> checked, my slice didn't completely remove BookMorph. =-O
> my next will.
> alain
>> Stef
>>
>> On Jun 13, 2009, at 10:39 PM, Alain Plantec wrote:
>>
>>> Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
>>>> issue 884: Bookmorph removal. Thanks alain!
>>>>
>>> I think that something was wrong because BookMorph is still present
>>> after #10337.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>

> Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
>> ok I prefer that than a merging bug.
>>
> the LongTestCase >>#DecompilerTests method is touched by the BookMorph
> removal.
> Unfortunately, the class LongTestCase is unpackaged.
> I guess that is is the reason why it was not in the slice.
> -> new issue http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=888
> Alain
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>

> Alain Plantec a écrit :
>> Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
>>> ok I prefer that than a merging bug.
>>>
>> the LongTestCase >>#DecompilerTests method is touched by the  
>> BookMorph
>> removal.
>> Unfortunately, the class LongTestCase is unpackaged.
> oups, this is the class DecompilerTests that is unpackaged and the
> method DecompilerTests>>decompilerDiscrepancies which is touched by  
> the
> BookMorph removal.
>> I guess that is is the reason why it was not in the slice.
>> -> new issue http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=888
>> Alain
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>