Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Developers

[ANN] 10412

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

5 messages Options

Stéphane Ducasse

[ANN] 10412

- Issue 1052: Cuis 0058-browseUndeclared.1.cs
SystemNavigation default browseUndeclaredReferences

- Issue 1055: Strike font preliminaries
StrikeFont preliminaries for CUIS enhanced fonts.

- Issue 1054: Cuis code author CUIS code author checking code
SystemNavigation default contributorsNotSignatories
SystemNavigation default allContributors
SystemNavigation default contributionsOf: ...

- Issue 1046: CompiledMethod>>asString throws error: Improper store
into indexable object
CompiledMethod>>asString

^self getSource Thanks dan shepherd

Stef

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Adrian Lienhard

Re: [ANN] 10412

> - Issue 1054: Cuis code author CUIS code author checking code
> SystemNavigation default contributorsNotSignatories
> SystemNavigation default allContributors
> SystemNavigation default contributionsOf: ...

Stef, what is the difference to the Methodauthorships package that
we've use for the license cleaning [1]? It seems that now we have a
duplicated and obsolete list of signatories in the image. Or did you
merge?

Cheers,
Adrian

http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/LicenseCleanEffort

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Stéphane Ducasse

Re: [ANN] 10412

On Aug 9, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:

>> - Issue 1054: Cuis code author CUIS code author checking code
>> SystemNavigation default contributorsNotSignatories
>> SystemNavigation default allContributors
>> SystemNavigation default contributionsOf: ...
>
> Stef, what is the difference to the Methodauthorships package that
> we've use for the license cleaning [1]?

I do not know.
I forgot this package.

> It seems that now we have a
> duplicated and obsolete list of signatories in the image. Or did you
> merge?

No we should.
What would be good is to fix all the initials to get the full name
instead.
What miguel did is nice for author we should get in a state where we
get more uniform
author information in the future.

>
> Cheers,
> Adrian
>
> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/LicenseCleanEffort
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Stéphane Ducasse

Re: [ANN] 10412

In reply to this post by Adrian Lienhard

Adrian

if the behavior in MethodAuthorship is better we can just removed what
I integrated.
There is no problem.
Let me know.

Stef

On Aug 9, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:

>> - Issue 1054: Cuis code author CUIS code author checking code
>> SystemNavigation default contributorsNotSignatories
>> SystemNavigation default allContributors
>> SystemNavigation default contributionsOf: ...
>
> Stef, what is the difference to the Methodauthorships package that
> we've use for the license cleaning [1]? It seems that now we have a
> duplicated and obsolete list of signatories in the image. Or did you
> merge?
>
> Cheers,
> Adrian
>
> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/LicenseCleanEffort
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Adrian Lienhard

Re: [ANN] 10412

OK, I can take a look to merge or remove it this week.

Maybe its a good idea to have this functionality in the image instead
of an external package (like this is will be easier to do license
audits in the future).

Adrian

On Aug 9, 2009, at 22:13 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

> Adrian
>
> if the behavior in MethodAuthorship is better we can just removed what
> I integrated.
> There is no problem.
> Let me know.
>
> Stef
>
>
> On Aug 9, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
>
>>> - Issue 1054: Cuis code author CUIS code author checking code
>>> SystemNavigation default contributorsNotSignatories
>>> SystemNavigation default allContributors
>>> SystemNavigation default contributionsOf: ...
>>
>> Stef, what is the difference to the Methodauthorships package that
>> we've use for the license cleaning [1]? It seems that now we have a
>> duplicated and obsolete list of signatories in the image. Or did you
>> merge?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Adrian
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/LicenseCleanEffort
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project