[ANN] Mathex 0.3 is out! How hard would it be to give the possibility to use it with Pillar?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[ANN] Mathex 0.3 is out! How hard would it be to give the possibility to use it with Pillar?

Julien Delplanque
Hi all,

I just released Mathex 0.3, you can look at the release
note here [1] if you want. :)

I wonder how hard it would be to give the possibility to
write Mathex directly inside Pillar? Mathex provide pdf/png
generation under Linux, so it is possible to create images
for non-LaTeX Pillar's exportation.

I would like to help to do this, if someone can give me some
keys to do it I would appreciate :)

Julien

[1]: https://github.com/juliendelplanque/mathex/releases/tag/0.3



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ANN] Mathex 0.3 is out! How hard would it be to give the possibility to use it with Pillar?

Damien Cassou-2

Julien Delplanque <[hidden email]> writes:

> I wonder how hard it would be to give the possibility to write Mathex
> directly inside Pillar? Mathex provide pdf/png generation under Linux,
> so it is possible to create images for non-LaTeX Pillar's exportation.


what about

${mathex:value=2 asMathex sqrt}$

This syntax already exists and it is easy to plug behavior to it. Look
at the PRAbstractAnnotation class.

Please open an issue on https://github.com/pillar-markup/pillar/issues
to discuss about it.

--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ANN] Mathex 0.3 is out! How hard would it be to give the possibility to use it with Pillar?

Julien Delplanque
On 22/10/15 17:56, Damien Cassou wrote:
> Julien Delplanque <[hidden email]> writes:
>
>> I wonder how hard it would be to give the possibility to write Mathex
>> directly inside Pillar? Mathex provide pdf/png generation under Linux,
>> so it is possible to create images for non-LaTeX Pillar's exportation.
>
> what about
>
> ${mathex:value=2 asMathex sqrt}$
Looks good but does the right part supports multi lines?
>
> This syntax already exists and it is easy to plug behavior to it. Look
> at the PRAbstractAnnotation class.
>
> Please open an issue on https://github.com/pillar-markup/pillar/issues
> to discuss about it.
>
Ok I'll do that.

Julien

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ANN] Mathex 0.3 is out! How hard would it be to give the possibility to use it with Pillar?

Damien Cassou-2

Julien Delplanque <[hidden email]> writes:

> On 22/10/15 17:56, Damien Cassou wrote:
>> Julien Delplanque <[hidden email]> writes:
>>
>>> I wonder how hard it would be to give the possibility to write Mathex
>>> directly inside Pillar? Mathex provide pdf/png generation under Linux,
>>> so it is possible to create images for non-LaTeX Pillar's exportation.
>>
>> what about
>>
>> ${mathex:value=2 asMathex sqrt}$
> Looks good but does the right part supports multi lines?

the right part ends with '}$'. If there are line breaks before, so be
it :-).

--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ANN] Mathex 0.3 is out! How hard would it be to give the possibility to use it with Pillar?

Julien Delplanque
Nice, I'll take time to implement this feature as soon as I can :).

On 26/10/15 14:37, Damien Cassou wrote:

> Julien Delplanque <[hidden email]> writes:
>
>> On 22/10/15 17:56, Damien Cassou wrote:
>>> Julien Delplanque <[hidden email]> writes:
>>>
>>>> I wonder how hard it would be to give the possibility to write Mathex
>>>> directly inside Pillar? Mathex provide pdf/png generation under Linux,
>>>> so it is possible to create images for non-LaTeX Pillar's exportation.
>>> what about
>>>
>>> ${mathex:value=2 asMathex sqrt}$
>> Looks good but does the right part supports multi lines?
> the right part ends with '}$'. If there are line breaks before, so be
> it :-).
>