In reply to this post by EstebanLM
When there is a new version of Pharo 6.1, how can I make the launcher know about it?
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
|
On 05/04/2018 17:14, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
> When there is a new version of Pharo 6.1, how can I make the launcher > know about it? > Hi, In "official distributions", just download a new Pharo 61 version from the launcher and it will be this version by default. It should be build 60540 I think. > Alexandre > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > >> On Apr 5, 2018, at 10:00 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email] >> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: >> >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20944/Integrate-Epicea-8-2-8-in-Ph6-1 >> >> > -- Cyril Ferlicot https://ferlicot.fr |
> In "official distributions", just download a new Pharo 61 version from
> the launcher and it will be this version by default. > > It should be build 60540 I think. I do not quite understand. I installed the launcher several months ago. Should I update the launcher? I think no. I see Pharo 6.1(stable), but I am not sure which build it is exactly. If I refresh the template list, does it ensure that I will have the last Pharo 6.1? Alexandre > >> Alexandre >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >>> On Apr 5, 2018, at 10:00 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email] >>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: >>> >>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20944/Integrate-Epicea-8-2-8-in-Ph6-1 >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Cyril Ferlicot > https://ferlicot.fr > |
You don't even need to refresh the list; downloading a particular pharo version (5, 6, 7, ...) always downloads the latest image version available. This has been the case for years. Normally you only need to update PharoLauncher every major release (so e.g. once Pharo 7 is released, etc.) Peter On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote: > In "official distributions", just download a new Pharo 61 version from |
Excellent! Thanks!
Alexandre > On Apr 7, 2018, at 10:48 AM, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote: > > You don't even need to refresh the list; downloading a particular pharo version (5, 6, 7, ...) always downloads the latest image version available. > This has been the case for years. Normally you only need to update PharoLauncher every major release (so e.g. once Pharo 7 is released, etc.) > > Peter > > On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote: > > In "official distributions", just download a new Pharo 61 version from > > the launcher and it will be this version by default. > > > > It should be build 60540 I think. > > I do not quite understand. I installed the launcher several months ago. Should I update the launcher? I think no. > I see Pharo 6.1(stable), but I am not sure which build it is exactly. > > If I refresh the template list, does it ensure that I will have the last Pharo 6.1? > > Alexandre > > > > >> Alexandre > >> -- > >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Apr 5, 2018, at 10:00 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email] > >>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: > >>> > >>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20944/Integrate-Epicea-8-2-8-in-Ph6-1 > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Cyril Ferlicot > > https://ferlicot.fr > > > > > |
It's a great new! But why it's not a 6.2 version? It would be more clear since this is continuation of version 6 with new changes. How one would revert to original 6.1 if this new version isn't working for him? On Sun, Apr 8, 2018, 09:56 Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote: Excellent! Thanks! |
In the same way as any previous image version... e.g. Pharo 6 is actually Pharo 60508 and lower, Pharo 6.1 is Pharo 60509-60539, and Pharo 6.2 is Pharo 60540+
(give or take couple of versions, don't remember the precise boundaries)
and you can download any specific image version you want https://files.pharo.org/image/60/ (it is a bit confusing, but Pharo 6 is not yet using git and the existing infrastructure is not keen on minor releases) Peter |
In reply to this post by EstebanLM
Great job, Esteban!
Doru > On Apr 5, 2018, at 3:00 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20944/Integrate-Epicea-8-2-8-in-Ph6-1 > > -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?" |
In reply to this post by Peter Uhnak
Thanks peter we should make this clearer.
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 2:13 PM, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote: >> But why it's not a 6.2 version? It would be more clear since this is >> continuation of version 6 with new changes. How one would revert to original >> 6.1 if this new version isn't working for him? > > > In the same way as any previous image version... e.g. > > Pharo 6 is actually Pharo 60508 and lower, > Pharo 6.1 is Pharo 60509-60539, > and Pharo 6.2 is Pharo 60540+ > (give or take couple of versions, don't remember the precise boundaries) > > and you can download any specific image version you want > https://files.pharo.org/image/60/ > > (it is a bit confusing, but Pharo 6 is not yet using git and the existing > infrastructure is not keen on minor releases) > > Peter |
In reply to this post by Peter Uhnak
hi,
yes, it is like this. to produce a 6.2 would be kind of a pain (as it was already 6.1 and it still causes confusion :P) we are working to have better numbering starting on Pharo 7 (and the bootstrapped process). cheers, Esteban
|
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
> On 8 Apr 2018, at 20:25, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Great job, Esteban! well, is more like the great job of Martin, I just did the integration. But thanks is his name ;) cheers! Esteban > > Doru > >> On Apr 5, 2018, at 3:00 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20944/Integrate-Epicea-8-2-8-in-Ph6-1 >> >> > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.feenk.com > > "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?" > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |