Hi,
Release 1.1 of Pier is now available: www.piercms.com/install What's new: - Several bug fixes - New syntax constructs - New and whiter stylesheet www.piercms.com also received a face lift, and it received some new documentation. Have fun and tell us what you think. Doru and Lukas _______________________________________________ SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki |
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-3
Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi, > > Release 1.1 of Pier is now available: > www.piercms.com/install > > What's new: > - Several bug fixes > - New syntax constructs > - New and whiter stylesheet > > www.piercms.com also received a face lift, and it received some new > documentation. > > Have fun and tell us what you think. > > Doru and Lukas Due to things moving too fast I am still stuck back in the Model-lr.235, and even then my components have lost their ability to edit settings, so I have lost control of my site! It would be nice to see some discussion of how things are moving forward. For example the new parser was a complete surprise, and really messed with my head. thanks in advance Keith _______________________________________________ SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki |
In reply to this post by kaveman
> How do I migrate my existing site to 1.1?
1. Save the image under a new name, just to be sure. 2. Disable an existing persistency strategy: aKernel persistency: PRNullPersistency new 3. Load the latest code of Magritte-Model, Magritte-Seaside and other Magritte packages you might have present in your image using Monticello. 4. Load the latest code of Pier-Model, Pier-Seaside and other Pier packages you might have present in your image using Monticello. 5. Re-enable the persistency either using the above command or through the web interface. I did the above procedure with several older images (among them lukas-renggli.ch and seaside.st) and it worked flawlessly. Some packages do an object migration when loading and detecting an incompatible model. So before you save your image again, test if everything works. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki |
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]> wrote:
> 4. Load the latest code of Pier-Model, Pier-Seaside and other Pier > packages you might have present in your image using Monticello. You must load Pier-Links in http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/pieraddons/ before updating Pier-Model or you are going to be surprised with obsolete classes. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st _______________________________________________ SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki |
In reply to this post by keith1y
> Any information on the new stuff would be great.
I will write something about the motivation behind the value links. > Due to things moving too fast I am still stuck back in the Model-lr.235, > and even then my components have lost their ability to edit settings, so > I have lost control of my site! I can't imagine how that could happen. Can you give more details? Is it a security issue? Is it just not displayed in the menu? Do you get an error? How about logging in as administrator? How about manually navigating to the settings by typing the URL and appending "?command=PRSettingsCommand"? > It would be nice to see some discussion of how things are moving > forward. For example the new parser was a complete surprise, and really > messed with my head. The new parser was introduced more than a year ago on August 12, 2007. The new parser is fully backward compatible, it passes the extact same tests as the old parser did, and it made it possible to have pluggable extensions to the wiki syntax. As long as you did not patch the old SmaCC parser there should be no compatibility issues (at least none were reported to me). Cheers, Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki |
In reply to this post by kaveman
Hi,
> Regarding the stylesheet, the previous one was clearly better. The > white is too white. To which stylesheet are you referring: the from the release or the one from piercms.com? "clearly better" is clearly not helpful because it's clearly not so clear :). Seriously, is there something that confuses you in the layout? Is there something you cannot find? Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing should have the right to be different." _______________________________________________ SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki |
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-3
Hi,
the new site looks good. From the installation video, I guess that by default Pier is started with the seaside halos enabled? If so, then a FAQ like "How do I secure my Pier installation?" with hints on disabling halos and changing passwords would make it easier for newbies to do the right thing. Cheers Matthias On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > Release 1.1 of Pier is now available: > www.piercms.com/install > > What's new: > - Several bug fixes > - New syntax constructs > - New and whiter stylesheet > > www.piercms.com also received a face lift, and it received some new > documentation. > > Have fun and tell us what you think. > > Doru and Lukas > > > _______________________________________________ > SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki > _______________________________________________ SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki |
In reply to this post by Lukas Renggli
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
> based one-click image. Is is possible? Is the data jailed inside the
> image? If so I'm afraid I'll have to stop using Pier. Of course the data is not jailed inside an image. There are many different serialization techniques available, basically you can use any of those to serialize the kernel and load it into a new image. ReferenceStreams that come with every image are a fairly good choice. However it is currently not a thing of a few clicks, it takes some time and patience. It could be that block contexts are in your model, and that your serialization framework of choice chokes on those. Usually it is not a problem to skip these and just serialize them as nil values. Cheers, Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki |
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-3
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
Hi Krishna,
Much clearer now :) The idea behind the stylesheet of the one-click installer is to inflict as less constraints as possible on the graphic design, so that it is easier for people to adapt it to their needs. In fact, if you add the old CSS over the new structure (you can do this via the Edit Design command) it mostly match because only few things have changed in the structure. Thanks for the feedback. Cheers, Doru p.s. Is your Pier webpage online somewhere? On Feb 5, 2009, at 4:53 PM, Krishna wrote: > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> Regarding the stylesheet, the previous one was clearly better. The >>> white is too white. >> >> >> To which stylesheet are you referring: the from the release or the >> one from >> piercms.com? >> > > I was referring to the newly released one-click installer. > >> "clearly better" is clearly not helpful because it's clearly not so >> clear >> :). Seriously, is there something that confuses you in the layout? >> Is there >> something you cannot find? >> > > Looks like my "clear" is clearly not clear so here is an attempt at > clearing it up: I was talking about the colors. Feeling robbed > without the black menu/tab bar. The current scheme is too whitish > although it looks ok in the daylight (which happened after I had > posted the not-so-clear comment). > > Cheers, > -Krishna > > -- > Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic > and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort? > - Aksel Peter Jorgensen > > _______________________________________________ > SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki -- www.tudorgirba.com "Being happy is a matter of choice." _______________________________________________ SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki |
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
I like this new pier page, but I fell like there is something missing
as far as the appearancee. the site feels very "empty" possibly caused by the lack of color? -- david zmick On Feb 5, 2009, at 10:56 PM, Krishna wrote: > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> > wrote: > >> p.s. Is your Pier webpage online somewhere? >> > > http://scriptek.co.in > > > > -- > Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic > and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort? > - Aksel Peter Jorgensen > > _______________________________________________ > SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki _______________________________________________ SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |