About MOOSE 5.1 in the CI

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

About MOOSE 5.1 in the CI

SergeStinckwich
Hi all,

I'm using usually the last MOOSE 5.1 image available in the CI
throught Pharo Launcher.
Recent MOOSE 5.1 have problems. For example 3 CMD-G in a Playground
return a DNU, because String>>findAnySubStr: delimiters startingAt:
start has been renamed in Pharo 5.0 into
findAnySubStrinhg: delimiters startingAt: start

I guess I should not use these images anymore, but why they are build
on the CI ?

The MOOSE 5.1 image should be labelled as stable in Pharo Launcher also.

Regards,
--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: About MOOSE 5.1 in the CI

Andrei Chis
Now we are not using the Moose 5.1 from CI for development.
Still I expect the CI job to keep building a working image.

I just tried the latest image from the CI and I see no problem with cmd+g in the Playground.
In what pharo image are you loading Moose 5.1?


Cheers,
Andrei

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi all,

I'm using usually the last MOOSE 5.1 image available in the CI
throught Pharo Launcher.
Recent MOOSE 5.1 have problems. For example 3 CMD-G in a Playground
return a DNU, because String>>findAnySubStr: delimiters startingAt:
start has been renamed in Pharo 5.0 into
findAnySubStrinhg: delimiters startingAt: start

I guess I should not use these images anymore, but why they are build
on the CI ?

The MOOSE 5.1 image should be labelled as stable in Pharo Launcher also.

Regards,
--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: About MOOSE 5.1 in the CI

Tudor Girba-2
Hi,

Just for the record, the jobs are:

Moose 5.1 - loads #stable on top of Pharo 4

Moose 6.0 - loads #development on top of Pharo 5

Cheers,
Doru



On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Andrei Chis <[hidden email]> wrote:
Now we are not using the Moose 5.1 from CI for development.
Still I expect the CI job to keep building a working image.

I just tried the latest image from the CI and I see no problem with cmd+g in the Playground.
In what pharo image are you loading Moose 5.1?


Cheers,
Andrei

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi all,

I'm using usually the last MOOSE 5.1 image available in the CI
throught Pharo Launcher.
Recent MOOSE 5.1 have problems. For example 3 CMD-G in a Playground
return a DNU, because String>>findAnySubStr: delimiters startingAt:
start has been renamed in Pharo 5.0 into
findAnySubStrinhg: delimiters startingAt: start

I guess I should not use these images anymore, but why they are build
on the CI ?

The MOOSE 5.1 image should be labelled as stable in Pharo Launcher also.

Regards,
--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev




--

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: About MOOSE 5.1 in the CI

SergeStinckwich
In reply to this post by Andrei Chis
Hum, my fault ...

In fact, I load a configuration in a new Moose 5.1 image with a
dependency to Moose development ...
Sorry about the noise.

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Andrei Chis <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Now we are not using the Moose 5.1 from CI for development.
> Still I expect the CI job to keep building a working image.
>
> I just tried the latest image from the CI and I see no problem with cmd+g in
> the Playground.
> In what pharo image are you loading Moose 5.1?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Andrei
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Serge Stinckwich
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm using usually the last MOOSE 5.1 image available in the CI
>> throught Pharo Launcher.
>> Recent MOOSE 5.1 have problems. For example 3 CMD-G in a Playground
>> return a DNU, because String>>findAnySubStr: delimiters startingAt:
>> start has been renamed in Pharo 5.0 into
>> findAnySubStrinhg: delimiters startingAt: start
>>
>> I guess I should not use these images anymore, but why they are build
>> on the CI ?
>>
>> The MOOSE 5.1 image should be labelled as stable in Pharo Launcher also.
>>
>> Regards,
>> --
>> Serge Stinckwich
>> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
>> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
>> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>



--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev