Hi jorge
did you publish the cleans for the tests you did during the sprint? Thanks Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Btw, I am running the Pharo tests in my builds now too:
http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/job/Pharo/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/(root)/ Click on duration twice to see the tests sorted by run-time. I feel a bit bad that the slowest test case is one that I wrote. I'll see if I can speed that up some more. Lukas On 15 March 2010 20:56, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi jorge > > did you publish the cleans for the tests you did during the sprint? > > Thanks Stef > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Yes, it would be very good to have faster tests. In my experience, if tests take too long to run, you don't use them.
During the sprint in Lille, Jorge started to sort out long running tests from the rest and make them subclass from SlowTestCase (or something similar). Cheers, Adrian On Mar 16, 2010, at 09:13 , Lukas Renggli wrote: > Btw, I am running the Pharo tests in my builds now too: > > http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/job/Pharo/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/(root)/ > > Click on duration twice to see the tests sorted by run-time. I feel a > bit bad that the slowest test case is one that I wrote. I'll see if I > can speed that up some more. > > Lukas > > On 15 March 2010 20:56, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Hi jorge >> >> did you publish the cleans for the tests you did during the sprint? >> >> Thanks Stef >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Hi,
No, I have to finish that. Is still in my todo list. I'll try to make some time today to look into that. Cheers, Jorge On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]> wrote: > Yes, it would be very good to have faster tests. In my experience, if tests take too long to run, you don't use them. > > During the sprint in Lille, Jorge started to sort out long running tests from the rest and make them subclass from SlowTestCase (or something similar). > > Cheers, > Adrian > > > On Mar 16, 2010, at 09:13 , Lukas Renggli wrote: > >> Btw, I am running the Pharo tests in my builds now too: >> >> http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/job/Pharo/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/(root)/ >> >> Click on duration twice to see the tests sorted by run-time. I feel a >> bit bad that the slowest test case is one that I wrote. I'll see if I >> can speed that up some more. >> >> Lukas >> >> On 15 March 2010 20:56, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> Hi jorge >>> >>> did you publish the cleans for the tests you did during the sprint? >>> >>> Thanks Stef >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Lukas Renggli >> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Lukas Renggli
Name: Gofer-Tests-lr.117
Author: lr Time: 16 March 2010, 10:12:10 am UUID: 884f7d2b-6035-4f66-9ec3-28371a77beac Ancestors: Gofer-Tests-lr.116 - made tests run faster in the Pharo inbox is about 30% faster. Lukas On 16 March 2010 09:13, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]> wrote: > Btw, I am running the Pharo tests in my builds now too: > > http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/job/Pharo/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/(root)/ > > Click on duration twice to see the tests sorted by run-time. I feel a > bit bad that the slowest test case is one that I wrote. I'll see if I > can speed that up some more. > > Lukas > > On 15 March 2010 20:56, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Hi jorge >> >> did you publish the cleans for the tests you did during the sprint? >> >> Thanks Stef >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Lukas Renggli
On Mar 16, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Lukas Renggli wrote: > Btw, I am running the Pharo tests in my builds now too: > > http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/job/Pharo/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/(root)/ > > Click on duration twice to see the tests sorted by run-time. I feel a > bit bad that the slowest test case is one that I wrote. I'll see if I > can speed that up some more. lol :) It is on my todo to read the mail of yanni on hudson. Stef > > Lukas > > On 15 March 2010 20:56, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Hi jorge >> >> did you publish the cleans for the tests you did during the sprint? >> >> Thanks Stef >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Jorge Ressia
focus on the paper jorge coding only for the fun :)
We have time. Stef On Mar 16, 2010, at 9:35 AM, Jorge Ressia wrote: > Hi, > > No, I have to finish that. Is still in my todo list. > I'll try to make some time today to look into that. > > Cheers, > > Jorge > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Yes, it would be very good to have faster tests. In my experience, if tests take too long to run, you don't use them. >> >> During the sprint in Lille, Jorge started to sort out long running tests from the rest and make them subclass from SlowTestCase (or something similar). >> >> Cheers, >> Adrian >> >> >> On Mar 16, 2010, at 09:13 , Lukas Renggli wrote: >> >>> Btw, I am running the Pharo tests in my builds now too: >>> >>> http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/job/Pharo/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/(root)/ >>> >>> Click on duration twice to see the tests sorted by run-time. I feel a >>> bit bad that the slowest test case is one that I wrote. I'll see if I >>> can speed that up some more. >>> >>> Lukas >>> >>> On 15 March 2010 20:56, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> Hi jorge >>>> >>>> did you publish the cleans for the tests you did during the sprint? >>>> >>>> Thanks Stef >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Lukas Renggli >>> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Lukas Renggli
cool!
On Mar 16, 2010, at 10:16 AM, Lukas Renggli wrote: > Name: Gofer-Tests-lr.117 > Author: lr > Time: 16 March 2010, 10:12:10 am > UUID: 884f7d2b-6035-4f66-9ec3-28371a77beac > Ancestors: Gofer-Tests-lr.116 > > - made tests run faster > > in the Pharo inbox is about 30% faster. > > Lukas > > On 16 March 2010 09:13, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Btw, I am running the Pharo tests in my builds now too: >> >> http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/job/Pharo/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/(root)/ >> >> Click on duration twice to see the tests sorted by run-time. I feel a >> bit bad that the slowest test case is one that I wrote. I'll see if I >> can speed that up some more. >> >> Lukas >> >> On 15 March 2010 20:56, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> Hi jorge >>> >>> did you publish the cleans for the tests you did during the sprint? >>> >>> Thanks Stef >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Lukas Renggli >> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch >> > > > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse
Sorry Stef, couldn't resist :)
Now there is a distinction between unit tests and the rest of them. Unit tests are depicted as fast and model oriented tests. Later we will have to introduce more kinds of test for enriching our build and development process, tests like functional, architectural, lint, etc. 6942 unit tests run in 34 secs instead than 2:25 min running all tests. I think this will encourage developers to run the tests a little more often. I implemented a fix in the next slice. Name: SLICE-FastAndSlowTestDisociation-JorgeRessia.1 Author: JorgeRessia Time: 16 March 2010, 8:50:41 pm UUID: 9c44289b-bccb-4198-9a98-6dd9979e9bdd Ancestors: Dependencies: Gofer-Tests-JorgeRessia.117, KernelTests-JorgeRessia.164, SUnit-JorgeRessia.86, SUnitGUI-JorgeRessia.45, Tests-JorgeRessia.48 Test cases now answer the message isUnitTest in order to differentiate the unit test from the rest of the tests. - The tests that take too long are no more considered unit tests. - Some test were functional test so there are not considered unit tests. - The TestRunner was modified. A new menu entry can be found in the class pane for selecting all unit tests. Some more fixes here: Name: SLICE-FastAndSlowTestDisociation-JorgeRessia.2 Author: JorgeRessia Time: 16 March 2010, 8:58:11 pm UUID: 86461af2-534b-4091-8f2e-973b650db098 Ancestors: SLICE-FastAndSlowTestDisociation-JorgeRessia.1 Dependencies: Gofer-Tests-JorgeRessia.117, KernelTests-JorgeRessia.164, SUnit-JorgeRessia.87, SUnitGUI-JorgeRessia.45, Tests-JorgeRessia.48 - test fixed Cheers, Jorge On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: > focus on the paper jorge coding only for the fun :) > We have time. > > Stef > > On Mar 16, 2010, at 9:35 AM, Jorge Ressia wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> No, I have to finish that. Is still in my todo list. >> I'll try to make some time today to look into that. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Jorge >> >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> Yes, it would be very good to have faster tests. In my experience, if tests take too long to run, you don't use them. >>> >>> During the sprint in Lille, Jorge started to sort out long running tests from the rest and make them subclass from SlowTestCase (or something similar). >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Adrian >>> >>> >>> On Mar 16, 2010, at 09:13 , Lukas Renggli wrote: >>> >>>> Btw, I am running the Pharo tests in my builds now too: >>>> >>>> http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/job/Pharo/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/(root)/ >>>> >>>> Click on duration twice to see the tests sorted by run-time. I feel a >>>> bit bad that the slowest test case is one that I wrote. I'll see if I >>>> can speed that up some more. >>>> >>>> Lukas >>>> >>>> On 15 March 2010 20:56, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> Hi jorge >>>>> >>>>> did you publish the cleans for the tests you did during the sprint? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Stef >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Lukas Renggli >>>> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
On Mar 16, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Jorge Ressia wrote: > Sorry Stef, couldn't resist :) I know the syndrom (noooooooI do not want to open latex to write........ . . .) I saw the picture on your board :) Ok once your oopsla paper is done, I would do discuss with you how we integrate - adrian kuhn changes - have a look at SUnit Extension made by Keith I will start to look at that (once I'm with some other papers to write :) Stef > > Now there is a distinction between unit tests and the rest of them. > Unit tests are depicted as fast and model oriented tests. Later we > will have to introduce more kinds of test for enriching our build and > development process, tests like functional, architectural, lint, etc. > > 6942 unit tests run in 34 secs instead than 2:25 min running all > tests. I think this will encourage developers to run the tests a > little more often. > > I implemented a fix in the next slice. > > Name: SLICE-FastAndSlowTestDisociation-JorgeRessia.1 > Author: JorgeRessia > Time: 16 March 2010, 8:50:41 pm > UUID: 9c44289b-bccb-4198-9a98-6dd9979e9bdd > Ancestors: > Dependencies: Gofer-Tests-JorgeRessia.117, > KernelTests-JorgeRessia.164, SUnit-JorgeRessia.86, > SUnitGUI-JorgeRessia.45, Tests-JorgeRessia.48 > > Test cases now answer the message isUnitTest in order to differentiate > the unit test from the rest of the tests. > > - The tests that take too long are no more considered unit tests. > - Some test were functional test so there are not considered unit tests. > - The TestRunner was modified. A new menu entry can be found in the > class pane for selecting all unit tests. > > > Some more fixes here: > > Name: SLICE-FastAndSlowTestDisociation-JorgeRessia.2 > Author: JorgeRessia > Time: 16 March 2010, 8:58:11 pm > UUID: 86461af2-534b-4091-8f2e-973b650db098 > Ancestors: SLICE-FastAndSlowTestDisociation-JorgeRessia.1 > Dependencies: Gofer-Tests-JorgeRessia.117, > KernelTests-JorgeRessia.164, SUnit-JorgeRessia.87, > SUnitGUI-JorgeRessia.45, Tests-JorgeRessia.48 > > - test fixed > > Cheers, > > Jorge > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Stéphane Ducasse > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> focus on the paper jorge coding only for the fun :) >> We have time. >> >> Stef >> >> On Mar 16, 2010, at 9:35 AM, Jorge Ressia wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> No, I have to finish that. Is still in my todo list. >>> I'll try to make some time today to look into that. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Jorge >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> Yes, it would be very good to have faster tests. In my experience, if tests take too long to run, you don't use them. >>>> >>>> During the sprint in Lille, Jorge started to sort out long running tests from the rest and make them subclass from SlowTestCase (or something similar). >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Adrian >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mar 16, 2010, at 09:13 , Lukas Renggli wrote: >>>> >>>>> Btw, I am running the Pharo tests in my builds now too: >>>>> >>>>> http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/job/Pharo/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/(root)/ >>>>> >>>>> Click on duration twice to see the tests sorted by run-time. I feel a >>>>> bit bad that the slowest test case is one that I wrote. I'll see if I >>>>> can speed that up some more. >>>>> >>>>> Lukas >>>>> >>>>> On 15 March 2010 20:56, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> Hi jorge >>>>>> >>>>>> did you publish the cleans for the tests you did during the sprint? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Stef >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Lukas Renggli >>>>> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |