About pragma renaming

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

About pragma renaming

Stéphane Ducasse
Hi doru

I want to start working on
        - producing a good FAMIX30
                -> So will continue to go over the comments
        - probably adding package: java at the right places.

Now I was thinking that to ease the transition I will duplicate the program
        MSE
        FM
so that code can continue to work and then later we remove MSE* ones.

stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: About pragma renaming

Tudor Girba-2
Hi,

On 30 Oct 2011, at 20:28, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

> Hi doru
>
> I want to start working on
> - producing a good FAMIX30
> -> So will continue to go over the comments
> - probably adding package: java at the right places.

Excellent. Actually, it's even better because now we can trim the overall meta-models based on the filter that Andre and me did.

> Now I was thinking that to ease the transition I will duplicate the program
> MSE
> FM

It should be FM3 :).

> so that code can continue to work and then later we remove MSE* ones.

That is probably a good idea. I will just add a OnMoose concern saying that we should no longer use the MSE ones.

Cheers,
Doru


> stef
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
www.tudorgirba.com

Things happen when they happen,
not when you talk about them happening.


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: About pragma renaming

Stéphane Ducasse
Ok first I must do the famix30 because we have a deliverables for 31 of october :(

Stef

On Oct 30, 2011, at 9:54 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 30 Oct 2011, at 20:28, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> Hi doru
>>
>> I want to start working on
>> - producing a good FAMIX30
>> -> So will continue to go over the comments
>> - probably adding package: java at the right places.
>
> Excellent. Actually, it's even better because now we can trim the overall meta-models based on the filter that Andre and me did.
>
>> Now I was thinking that to ease the transition I will duplicate the program
>> MSE
>> FM
>
> It should be FM3 :).
>
>> so that code can continue to work and then later we remove MSE* ones.
>
> That is probably a good idea. I will just add a OnMoose concern saying that we should no longer use the MSE ones.
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
>> stef
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> Things happen when they happen,
> not when you talk about them happening.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: About pragma renaming

Tudor Girba-2
On 30 Oct 2011, at 23:02, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

> Ok first I must do the famix30 because we have a deliverables for 31 of october :(

What do you mean do famix30? Can I help?

Doru


> Stef
>
> On Oct 30, 2011, at 9:54 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 30 Oct 2011, at 20:28, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>
>>> Hi doru
>>>
>>> I want to start working on
>>> - producing a good FAMIX30
>>> -> So will continue to go over the comments
>>> - probably adding package: java at the right places.
>>
>> Excellent. Actually, it's even better because now we can trim the overall meta-models based on the filter that Andre and me did.
>>
>>> Now I was thinking that to ease the transition I will duplicate the program
>>> MSE
>>> FM
>>
>> It should be FM3 :).
>>
>>> so that code can continue to work and then later we remove MSE* ones.
>>
>> That is probably a good idea. I will just add a OnMoose concern saying that we should no longer use the MSE ones.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>>> stef
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> Things happen when they happen,
>> not when you talk about them happening.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"It's not how it is, it is how we see it."


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: About pragma renaming

Stéphane Ducasse
I mean that we have to produce a report for a deliverable and I want to describe use and FAMIX 3.0
So part of it will be done automatically and part manually.

On Oct 30, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:

> On 30 Oct 2011, at 23:02, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> Ok first I must do the famix30 because we have a deliverables for 31 of october :(
>
> What do you mean do famix30? Can I help?
>
> Doru
>
>
>> Stef
>>
>> On Oct 30, 2011, at 9:54 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 30 Oct 2011, at 20:28, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi doru
>>>>
>>>> I want to start working on
>>>> - producing a good FAMIX30
>>>> -> So will continue to go over the comments
>>>> - probably adding package: java at the right places.
>>>
>>> Excellent. Actually, it's even better because now we can trim the overall meta-models based on the filter that Andre and me did.
>>>
>>>> Now I was thinking that to ease the transition I will duplicate the program
>>>> MSE
>>>> FM
>>>
>>> It should be FM3 :).
>>>
>>>> so that code can continue to work and then later we remove MSE* ones.
>>>
>>> That is probably a good idea. I will just add a OnMoose concern saying that we should no longer use the MSE ones.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Doru
>>>
>>>
>>>> stef
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>> --
>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>
>>> Things happen when they happen,
>>> not when you talk about them happening.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "It's not how it is, it is how we see it."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev