About roassal2
Locked
 
|
Hi alex
Why Roassal depends on FuelMetalevel? - having the stable as a baseline is not nice because clients will cry big times. - there is no correct version and it would be good to use versionner to manage it and to release some versions from time to time. Now that roassal2 is out it is importnt that people can build on versions if they want. Typically Synectiquers should really pay attention to this "detail" - unique version is pure junk and looks like from a tutorial so I can clean it. - versionDevelopment: introduce a dependencies to FuelMetalevel. I do not have access to it but I can clean it fast. Else I will fork it. Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
> Why Roassal depends on FuelMetalevel?
Because Roassal1 has a feature to export view using Fuel. This was never really used actually. > - having the stable as a baseline is not nice because clients will cry big times. > - there is no correct version and it would be good to use versionner to manage it > and to release some versions from time to time. Now that roassal2 is out it is importnt that people > can build on versions if they want. > > Typically Synectiquers should really pay attention to this "detail" > > - unique version is pure junk and looks like from a tutorial so I can clean it. > > - versionDevelopment: introduce a dependencies to FuelMetalevel. > > I do not have access to it but I can clean it fast. Else I will fork it. Which version of Roassal are you referring to? Roassal 1 or 2? Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Stef means Roassal 1. Exactly because Fuel was not used, we can remove this behavior. I guess there is quite some client code that still uses Roassal 1, so, it would still be nice to have a clean version of Roassal 1 even after we remove it from the main Moose distribution.
Doru On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
I will work on this then.
Alexandre On Jun 29, 2014, at 1:02 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote: > Stef means Roassal 1. > > Exactly because Fuel was not used, we can remove this behavior. I guess there is quite some client code that still uses Roassal 1, so, it would still be nice to have a clean version of Roassal 1 even after we remove it from the main Moose distribution. > > Doru > > > On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Why Roassal depends on FuelMetalevel? > > Because Roassal1 has a feature to export view using Fuel. This was never really used actually. > > > - having the stable as a baseline is not nice because clients will cry big times. > > - there is no correct version and it would be good to use versionner to manage it > > and to release some versions from time to time. Now that roassal2 is out it is importnt that people > > can build on versions if they want. > > > > Typically Synectiquers should really pay attention to this "detail" > > > > - unique version is pure junk and looks like from a tutorial so I can clean it. > > > > - versionDevelopment: introduce a dependencies to FuelMetalevel. > > > > I do not have access to it but I can clean it fast. Else I will fork it. > > Which version of Roassal are you referring to? Roassal 1 or 2? > > Alexandre > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow" > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by abergel
Alex
have a look at the configuration because it is not clean. I can fix it. >> Why Roassal depends on FuelMetalevel? > Because Roassal1 has a feature to export view using Fuel. This was never really used actually. > >> - having the stable as a baseline is not nice because clients will cry big times. >> - there is no correct version and it would be good to use versionner to manage it >> and to release some versions from time to time. Now that roassal2 is out it is importnt that people >> can build on versions if they want. >> >> Typically Synectiquers should really pay attention to this "detail" >> >> - unique version is pure junk and looks like from a tutorial so I can clean it. >> >> - versionDevelopment: introduce a dependencies to FuelMetalevel. >> >> I do not have access to it but I can clean it fast. Else I will fork it. > Which version of Roassal are you referring to? Roassal 1 or 2? > > Alexandre _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
> Stef means Roassal 1. > > Exactly because Fuel was not used, we can remove this behavior. I > guess there is quite some client code that still uses Roassal 1, so, > it would still be nice to have a clean version of Roassal 1 even after > we remove it from the main Moose distribution. This is really important to have Roassal1 fully working. Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by abergel
This is really simple. 2 min to fix.
I'm getting fast on that and I can do it. Use Versionner it is cool. Stef On 29/6/14 15:23, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > I will work on this then. > > Alexandre > > > On Jun 29, 2014, at 1:02 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Stef means Roassal 1. >> >> Exactly because Fuel was not used, we can remove this behavior. I guess there is quite some client code that still uses Roassal 1, so, it would still be nice to have a clean version of Roassal 1 even after we remove it from the main Moose distribution. >> >> Doru >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> Why Roassal depends on FuelMetalevel? >> Because Roassal1 has a feature to export view using Fuel. This was never really used actually. >> >>> - having the stable as a baseline is not nice because clients will cry big times. >>> - there is no correct version and it would be good to use versionner to manage it >>> and to release some versions from time to time. Now that roassal2 is out it is importnt that people >>> can build on versions if they want. >>> >>> Typically Synectiquers should really pay attention to this "detail" >>> >>> - unique version is pure junk and looks like from a tutorial so I can clean it. >>> >>> - versionDevelopment: introduce a dependencies to FuelMetalevel. >>> >>> I do not have access to it but I can clean it fast. Else I will fork it. >> Which version of Roassal are you referring to? Roassal 1 or 2? >> >> Alexandre >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Every thing has its own flow" >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by stepharo
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:38 AM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
Are we not suppose to migrate all the projects using Roassal1 to Roassal2 ? We did some with Anne few weeks ago but I do not have any news of that.
Cheers, Leo PerardUniversity of Lille 1 _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Yes, in the final Moose 5.0, we should end up with only Roassal2. However, there exist external code that is based on Roassal 1 already, so Roassal 1 should remain clean and loadable separately. Cheers, Doru On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Leo Perard <[hidden email]> wrote:
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
+1
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by stepharo
Hi Stef,
You have now access to roassal 1 Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. On Jun 28, 2014, at 1:39 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi alex _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
ok I will have a look.
On 2/7/14 04:00, Alexandre Bergel
wrote:
Hi Stef, _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Ok I looked at it and Roassal1 was nearly ok.
I produced a new stable version with latest image versions including all the packages (Athens and others). Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
«
Return to Moose
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |