Dear all,
with a colleague from Savoie University, we are looking for some Smalltalk code in order to model, execute and animate Activity Diagram. Any existing works ? Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
As far as I know, there is nothing like this, however we are quite interested in visualizing activity diagrams.
Roassal should support this kind of diagram. In addition, we have two code profilers framework to extract the execution (Gadget and Spy). I will be happy to beta-test any code that goes in that direction. Kind regards, Alexandre On Dec 23, 2013, at 3:39 PM, Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]> wrote: > Dear all, > > with a colleague from Savoie University, we are looking for some > Smalltalk code in order to model, execute and animate Activity > Diagram. Any existing works ? > > Regards, > -- > Serge Stinckwich > UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) > Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk > http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
You can talk with Roberto Minelli, as he is doing something for DFlow (but in js as far as I know). Maybe he can tell something useful.
Uko On 23 Dec 2013, at 18:09, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote: > As far as I know, there is nothing like this, however we are quite interested in visualizing activity diagrams. > > Roassal should support this kind of diagram. In addition, we have two code profilers framework to extract the execution (Gadget and Spy). > > I will be happy to beta-test any code that goes in that direction. > > Kind regards, > Alexandre > > > On Dec 23, 2013, at 3:39 PM, Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> with a colleague from Savoie University, we are looking for some >> Smalltalk code in order to model, execute and animate Activity >> Diagram. Any existing works ? >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Serge Stinckwich >> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) >> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk >> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
In reply to this post by SergeStinckwich
Did you take a look at the BabyMock (2) work by Attila Magyar (@zeroflag)?
Stephan _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Apparently there is some support for collaboration and sequence
diagrams but nothing about activity diagrams. Regards, On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Stephan Eggermont <[hidden email]> wrote: > Did you take a look at the BabyMock (2) work by Attila Magyar (@zeroflag)? > > Stephan > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
In reply to this post by SergeStinckwich
Serge
in VW there was an extension of MethodWrappers that supported the generation of SequenceDiagrams. Stef On 23 Dec 2013, at 15:39, Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]> wrote: > Dear all, > > with a colleague from Savoie University, we are looking for some > Smalltalk code in order to model, execute and animate Activity > Diagram. Any existing works ? > > Regards, > -- > Serge Stinckwich > UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) > Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk > http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ > _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
http://www.laputan.org/brant/brant.html
I remember that we used it. Stef > Serge > > in VW there was an extension of MethodWrappers that supported the generation of SequenceDiagrams. > > Stef > > On 23 Dec 2013, at 15:39, Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> with a colleague from Savoie University, we are looking for some >> Smalltalk code in order to model, execute and animate Activity >> Diagram. Any existing works ? >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Serge Stinckwich >> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) >> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk >> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ >> > _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Ok thank you Stéphane, but activity diagrams are quite different from
sequence ones: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activity_diagram On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: > http://www.laputan.org/brant/brant.html > > I remember that we used it. > > Stef > >> Serge >> >> in VW there was an extension of MethodWrappers that supported the generation of SequenceDiagrams. >> >> Stef >> >> On 23 Dec 2013, at 15:39, Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> with a colleague from Savoie University, we are looking for some >>> Smalltalk code in order to model, execute and animate Activity >>> Diagram. Any existing works ? >>> >>> Regards, >>> -- >>> Serge Stinckwich >>> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) >>> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk >>> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ >>> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Yes indeed then in that case I would really try to get ConnectorMorph working in pharo.
I can send you a drop box with a working version in 3.9 stef On 24 Dec 2013, at 18:11, Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]> wrote: > Ok thank you Stéphane, but activity diagrams are quite different from > sequence ones: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activity_diagram > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Stéphane Ducasse > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> http://www.laputan.org/brant/brant.html >> >> I remember that we used it. >> >> Stef >> >>> Serge >>> >>> in VW there was an extension of MethodWrappers that supported the generation of SequenceDiagrams. >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> On 23 Dec 2013, at 15:39, Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> with a colleague from Savoie University, we are looking for some >>>> Smalltalk code in order to model, execute and animate Activity >>>> Diagram. Any existing works ? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> -- >>>> Serge Stinckwich >>>> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) >>>> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk >>>> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ >>>> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > > -- > Serge Stinckwich > UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) > Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk > http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ > _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
On 25 Dec 2013, at 19:02, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: > Yes indeed then in that case I would really try to get ConnectorMorph working in pharo. > I can send you a drop box with a working version in 3.9 > Keep in mind that Connectors where a quite huge and complex (and intrusive) (yet *Very very* cool…) piece of work… getting them to work in Pharo will be a challenge. In the end, I think the largest problem of connectors always was that they here not merged with Morphic *for real* (while cleaning up both), as they show very much the real power of Morphic. I did start to integrate the hooks + enhancements in Squeak 3.9, but in the end it turned out to be quite a hack in some parts and thus just increased the complexity of Morphic… Marcus _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Yes you are right. I was looking at the code today and this is too large.
I will read the code from time to time to see what we can do with it because may be a lighter version would be good. Stef >> Yes indeed then in that case I would really try to get ConnectorMorph working in pharo. >> I can send you a drop box with a working version in 3.9 >> > > Keep in mind that Connectors where a quite huge and complex (and intrusive) > (yet *Very very* cool…) piece of work… getting them to work in Pharo will be a challenge. > > In the end, I think the largest problem of connectors always was that they here not merged > with Morphic *for real* (while cleaning up both), as they show very much the real power of Morphic. > > I did start to integrate the hooks + enhancements in Squeak 3.9, but in the end it turned out > to be quite a hack in some parts and thus just increased the complexity of Morphic… > > Marcus _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
In reply to this post by abergel
BTW, I found an interesting paper that describe how to draw activity
diagrams here : http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/volltexte/2006/2459/pdf/activity.pdf Regards, On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote: > As far as I know, there is nothing like this, however we are quite interested in visualizing activity diagrams. > > Roassal should support this kind of diagram. In addition, we have two code profilers framework to extract the execution (Gadget and Spy). > > I will be happy to beta-test any code that goes in that direction. > > Kind regards, > Alexandre > > > On Dec 23, 2013, at 3:39 PM, Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> with a colleague from Savoie University, we are looking for some >> Smalltalk code in order to model, execute and animate Activity >> Diagram. Any existing works ? >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Serge Stinckwich >> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) >> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk >> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |