Adding accessing methods
Locked
 
|
hi!
What about adding in FAMIXClass: withAllSubclasses, allSubclasses, superclasses, withAllSuperclasses, allSuperclasses FAMIXClass should be somewhat polymorphic to Behavior. That would be useful... I can do it. Any opinion? Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: Adding accessing methods
|
|
I'm for especially since we would like to be able to have pharo objects as metamodel instead of FAMIX.
Stef On Apr 23, 2010, at 8:05 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > hi! > > What about adding in FAMIXClass: > withAllSubclasses, allSubclasses, superclasses, withAllSuperclasses, allSuperclasses > > FAMIXClass should be somewhat polymorphic to Behavior. > That would be useful... I can do it. > > Any opinion? > > Cheers, > Alexandre > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: Adding accessing methods
|
|
> I'm for especially since we would like to be able to have pharo
> objects as metamodel instead of FAMIX. Indeed!!! I would like to have numberOfMethods, numberOfLinesOfCode, numberOfAttributes defined in Behavior. Stef, does this make sense? Shall I produce a slice and put it PharoInbox? Alexandre > > Stef > On Apr 23, 2010, at 8:05 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> hi! >> >> What about adding in FAMIXClass: >> withAllSubclasses, allSubclasses, superclasses, >> withAllSuperclasses, allSuperclasses >> >> FAMIXClass should be somewhat polymorphic to Behavior. >> That would be useful... I can do it. >> >> Any opinion? >> >> Cheers, >> Alexandre >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: Adding accessing methods
|
|
On Apr 23, 2010, at 10:50 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> I'm for especially since we would like to be able to have pharo objects as metamodel instead of FAMIX. > > Indeed!!! > I would like to have numberOfMethods, numberOfLinesOfCode, numberOfAttributes defined in Behavior. the problems is that numberOfAttributes is not the right vocabulary. Did you check for the other ones if there is not already an equivalent? Stef > Stef, does this make sense? Shall I produce a slice and put it PharoInbox? > > Alexandre > > >> >> Stef >> On Apr 23, 2010, at 8:05 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> >>> hi! >>> >>> What about adding in FAMIXClass: >>> withAllSubclasses, allSubclasses, superclasses, withAllSuperclasses, allSuperclasses >>> >>> FAMIXClass should be somewhat polymorphic to Behavior. >>> That would be useful... I can do it. >>> >>> Any opinion? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Alexandre >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: Adding accessing methods
|
|
>> I would like to have numberOfMethods,
>> , numberOfAttributes defined in Behavior. > > the problems is that numberOfAttributes is not the right vocabulary. > Did you check for the other ones if there is not already an > equivalent? Behavior>>instSize returns the number of named variables, tacking class inheritance into account. ClassDescription>>numberOfMethods returns the number of local (ie not defined in a trait) methods Behavior has nothing close to FAMIXClass>>numberOfLinesOfCode. Cheers, Alexandre > > Stef > >> Stef, does this make sense? Shall I produce a slice and put it >> PharoInbox? >> >> Alexandre >> >> >>> >>> Stef >>> On Apr 23, 2010, at 8:05 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>> >>>> hi! >>>> >>>> What about adding in FAMIXClass: >>>> withAllSubclasses, allSubclasses, superclasses, >>>> withAllSuperclasses, allSuperclasses >>>> >>>> FAMIXClass should be somewhat polymorphic to Behavior. >>>> That would be useful... I can do it. >>>> >>>> Any opinion? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Alexandre >>>> -- >>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: Adding accessing methods
|
|
I thought that CompiledMethod has something because marcus use it to compute some stats now
rationalizing would be good. so propose something on pharo and numberOfInstanceVariables would be better On Apr 24, 2010, at 10:53 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>> I would like to have numberOfMethods, >>> , numberOfAttributes defined in Behavior. >> >> the problems is that numberOfAttributes is not the right vocabulary. >> Did you check for the other ones if there is not already an equivalent? > > Behavior>>instSize returns the number of named variables, tacking class inheritance into account. > ClassDescription>>numberOfMethods returns the number of local (ie not defined in a trait) methods > > Behavior has nothing close to FAMIXClass>>numberOfLinesOfCode. > > Cheers, > Alexandre > > >> >> Stef >> >>> Stef, does this make sense? Shall I produce a slice and put it PharoInbox? >>> >>> Alexandre >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Stef >>>> On Apr 23, 2010, at 8:05 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>>> >>>>> hi! >>>>> >>>>> What about adding in FAMIXClass: >>>>> withAllSubclasses, allSubclasses, superclasses, withAllSuperclasses, allSuperclasses >>>>> >>>>> FAMIXClass should be somewhat polymorphic to Behavior. >>>>> That would be useful... I can do it. >>>>> >>>>> Any opinion? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Alexandre >>>>> -- >>>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
«
Return to Moose
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |