Hi all,
Stephan Pair asked a good question on Squeak mailing list. Why is Aida released under LGPL licence, while most squeak tools are under MIT? As you know LGPL is not very clear about code/image and such things, and more important, squeakers somehow don't like this licence. So, is there a good reason behind this ? Cheers! Nico -- Nicolas Petton http://nico.bioskop.fr ___ ooooooo OOOOOOOOO |Smalltalk| OOOOOOOOO ooooooo \ / [|] -------------------------------- Ma clé PGP est disponible ici : http://nico.bioskop.fr/pgp-key.html _______________________________________________ Aida mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.aidaweb.si/mailman/listinfo/aida signature.asc (196 bytes) Download Attachment |
Hi Nico,
Nicolas Petton wrote: > Stephan Pair asked a good question on Squeak mailing list. Why is Aida > released under LGPL licence, while most squeak tools are under MIT? > > As you know LGPL is not very clear about code/image and such things, and > more important, squeakers somehow don't like this licence. > > So, is there a good reason behind this ? I just answered him: We can relicence to MIT or whatever else, because for me all what is important is to use the code in accordance to the main rule on our world: a Golden Rule: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethic_of_reciprocity So, I propose that we make a relicensing to MIT, that those guys will be satisfied at last. Do others agree? Best regards Janko -- Janko Mivšek AIDA/Web Smalltalk Web Application Server http://www.aidaweb.si _______________________________________________ Aida mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.aidaweb.si/mailman/listinfo/aida |
Janko Mivšek wrote:
> Hi Nico, > > Nicolas Petton wrote: > >> Stephan Pair asked a good question on Squeak mailing list. Why is Aida >> released under LGPL licence, while most squeak tools are under MIT? >> >> As you know LGPL is not very clear about code/image and such things, and >> more important, squeakers somehow don't like this licence. >> >> So, is there a good reason behind this ? > > I just answered him: We can relicence to MIT or whatever else, because > for me all what is important is to use the code in accordance to the > main rule on our world: a Golden Rule: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethic_of_reciprocity > > So, I propose that we make a relicensing to MIT, that those guys will be > satisfied at last. Do others agree? Yes. I believe MIT license is much more within the spirit of the Smalltalk community. And as such, I believe this will open doors and some minds to the option and availability of Aida/Scribo. My suggestion would be to make a new release, maybe 6.0 alpha/beta/??? whatever and release it under the MIT license. This would make a clean line of separation as to what is covered under what license. Thank you very much for considering doing this. I honestly believe it would be a good decision and one which will benefit Smalltalk and Aida/Scribo. Jimmie _______________________________________________ Aida mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.aidaweb.si/mailman/listinfo/aida |
I'm so new here, learning Aida in the little free time I've and can't
say what you must to do with your product, but licensing under MIT license surely will help to have a broader consideration inside the Squeak community. Just an opinion. Cheers. 2008/3/14, Jimmie Houchin <[hidden email]>: > Janko Mivšek wrote: > > Hi Nico, > > > > Nicolas Petton wrote: > > > >> Stephan Pair asked a good question on Squeak mailing list. Why is Aida > >> released under LGPL licence, while most squeak tools are under MIT? > >> > >> As you know LGPL is not very clear about code/image and such things, and > >> more important, squeakers somehow don't like this licence. > >> > >> So, is there a good reason behind this ? > > > > I just answered him: We can relicence to MIT or whatever else, because > > for me all what is important is to use the code in accordance to the > > main rule on our world: a Golden Rule: > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethic_of_reciprocity > > > > So, I propose that we make a relicensing to MIT, that those guys will be > > satisfied at last. Do others agree? > > > Yes. I believe MIT license is much more within the spirit of the > Smalltalk community. And as such, I believe this will open doors and > some minds to the option and availability of Aida/Scribo. > > My suggestion would be to make a new release, maybe 6.0 alpha/beta/??? > whatever and release it under the MIT license. This would make a clean > line of separation as to what is covered under what license. > > Thank you very much for considering doing this. I honestly believe it > would be a good decision and one which will benefit Smalltalk and > Aida/Scribo. > > > Jimmie > > > _______________________________________________ > Aida mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.aidaweb.si/mailman/listinfo/aida > -- Germán S. Arduino http://www.arsol.biz http://www.arsol.net _______________________________________________ Aida mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.aidaweb.si/mailman/listinfo/aida |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |