Hi guys,
I really like to use Amber browser for browsing code in my image and I got an idea to implement a REST API in my image, then Amber browser can use it. For browsing for start, later even for editing. Imagine where we can go with such approach: remote access to headless images on your servers from a standar web browser ... including inspecting, live debugging ... What do you think, is it worth going this REST path? Janko -- Janko Mivšek Aida/Web Smalltalk Web Application Server http://www.aidaweb.si |
Am 27.02.2012 19:59 schrieb "Janko Mivšek" <[hidden email][hidden email][hidden email]>: REST will definetly become THE database interface standard. Why? Every application Supports JSON, the in/outboxing/transfer standard for data. You can't do anything wrong! Never. Guido Stepken > Janko |
I think Avi Bryant did something like that with Squeak. Take a look here:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Guido Stepken <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
I was just thinking about doing the same thing for use with Amazon S3.
Please let me know as you progress on this and if you need help or testers... On Feb 27, 11:48 am, Amber Milan Eskridge <[hidden email]> wrote: > I think Avi Bryant did something like that with Squeak. > Take a look here:http://almaer.com/blog/headless-eclipse-and-smalltalk-browsing-with-b...http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside/2009-February/019... > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Guido Stepken <[hidden email]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > Am 27.02.2012 19:59 schrieb "Janko Mivšek" <janko.mivsek<[hidden email]> > > @ <[hidden email]>gmail.com <[hidden email]>>: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > I really like to use Amber browser for browsing code in my image and I > > > got an idea to implement a REST API in my image, then Amber browser can > > > use it. For browsing for start, later even for editing. > > > > Imagine where we can go with such approach: remote access to headless > > > images on your servers from a standar web browser ... including > > > inspecting, live debugging ... > > > > What do you think, is it worth going this REST path? > > > REST will definetly become THE database interface standard. > > > Why? Every application Supports JSON, the in/outboxing/transfer standard > > for data. > > > You can't do anything wrong! Never. > > > Guido Stepken > > > > Janko > > > > -- > > > Janko Mivšek > > > Aida/Web > > > Smalltalk Web Application Server > > > http:// <http://www.aidaweb.si>www.aidaweb.si |
In reply to this post by Janko Mivšek-2
I think one problem is that squeak und the amber dialects are
different. You could use a browser, to browse code in your remote image, but when you want to produce code in your browser (in amber) an then let the same code run in your image - that might not work. Maybe you should code a seaside-app that runs everything in the image? I had several attempts to use amber on the server-side (on Rhino or on node.js) and my approach was that serverside and clientside use exactly the same classes. So i can write classes in my browser, test them etc. and than push everything to the server for execution on the serverside. regards, Stefan Am 27. Februar 2012 19:59 schrieb Janko Mivšek <[hidden email]>: > Hi guys, > > I really like to use Amber browser for browsing code in my image and I > got an idea to implement a REST API in my image, then Amber browser can > use it. For browsing for start, later even for editing. > > Imagine where we can go with such approach: remote access to headless > images on your servers from a standar web browser ... including > inspecting, live debugging ... > > What do you think, is it worth going this REST path? > > Janko > > -- > Janko Mivšek > Aida/Web > Smalltalk Web Application Server > http://www.aidaweb.si > -- Dipl.-Wirtsch.-Inf. Stefan Krecher Neulander Str. 17, 27374 Visselhövede Tel +49(0)4262 958848 mobil +49(0)172 3608616 http://krecher.com |
Hi!
To browse Pharo/VW code with a client written in Amber, you would have to write a custom class browser as the one in Amber is really specific to Amber. That said a browser is just a few panes and a textarea, and the class browser of Amber could be partially reused (at least the UI rendering). Cheers, Nico On 28/02/12 09:14, Stefan Krecher wrote: > I think one problem is that squeak und the amber dialects are > different. You could use a browser, to browse code in your remote > image, but when you want to produce code in your browser (in amber) an > then let the same code run in your image - that might not work. > Maybe you should code a seaside-app that runs everything in the image? > I had several attempts to use amber on the server-side (on Rhino or on > node.js) and my approach was that serverside and clientside use > exactly the same classes. So i can write classes in my browser, test > them etc. and than push everything to the server for execution on the > serverside. > regards, > Stefan > > Am 27. Februar 2012 19:59 schrieb Janko Mivšek<[hidden email]>: >> Hi guys, >> >> I really like to use Amber browser for browsing code in my image and I >> got an idea to implement a REST API in my image, then Amber browser can >> use it. For browsing for start, later even for editing. >> >> Imagine where we can go with such approach: remote access to headless >> images on your servers from a standar web browser ... including >> inspecting, live debugging ... >> >> What do you think, is it worth going this REST path? >> >> Janko >> >> -- >> Janko Mivšek >> Aida/Web >> Smalltalk Web Application Server >> http://www.aidaweb.si >> > > > -- Nicolas Petton http://nicolas-petton.fr |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |