Herby Vojčík wrote:
>
>
> Eric Velten de Melo wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I was wondering what would be the effort required to make something
>> similar to Amber, but using Self programming language as a base? I think
>> Self is a wonderful language very similar to Smalltalk and also to
>> Javascript since it doesn't have the class/object duality. Currently
>> Self is something of a toy language and maybe the push to the web is
>> just what it needs to gain popularity.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>
> Well, I had similar views, as I like Self's classlessness, but: lot of
> work, different ecosystem (not the Smalltalk has big one, but Pharo in
> fact has libraries; and Self's at:Put: would make
... probably cut and sent abruptly.
Do not know how complicated it would be to do the Self's low-level
intricacies (block as self-executing object inheriting self* and such).
>>
>> Eric
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "amber-lang" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> an email to
[hidden email]
>> <mailto:
[hidden email]>.
>> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
[hidden email].
For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.