For quite some time, I've been keeping an eye out for a Smalltalk on .NET Has anybody ventured down this path? Does anyone see any initial show stopper problems with such an approach, proposed below, to host Amber on .NET? I'm wondering about the viability of Amber Smalltalk on a Javascript implemented for .NET? Based on my reviews, Jurassic may be most promising. http://jurassic.codeplex.com/ What is Jurassic?Jurassic is an implementation of the ECMAScript language and runtime. It aims to provide the best performing and most standards-compliant implementation of JavaScript for .NET. Jurassic is not intended for end-users; instead it is intended to be integrated into .NET programs. If you are the author of a .NET program, you can use Jurassic to compile and execute JavaScript code. Features
And, the following tools would ease the integration with .NET classes... IntroI’m developing a helper library for the awesome .Net JavaScript engine Jurassic. This will make it easier to control exactly what .Net classes you want to expose to JavaScript, just add some custom attributes, no need to inherit from I felt the need to clearly define what gets exposed and what not. Although Jurassic has Another thing that is important to me, is to write code that can not only be used from JS but also via .Net. That means write code once, use it via .Net or JS, your choice. No need to worry about Check out some of the features and examples below (and compare them to the original way). No modifications were made to the Jurassic code, everything is done by the JurassicTools themselves! Then, there is Javascript.NET, an integration of Google's V8 Javascript VM with .NET and, IronJS https://github.com/fholm/ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |