Amber vs Pharo syntax differences

Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Amber vs Pharo syntax differences

Michael Burns
Is there a comparison or summary doc for Amber syntax and Pharo?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/amber-lang/b9bf34af-4f18-4702-8e8f-48ecf0d7d0a6n%40googlegroups.com.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Amber vs Pharo syntax differences

Herby Vojčík
On 18. 5. 2021 23:39, Michael Burns wrote:
> Is there a comparison or summary doc for Amber syntax and Pharo?

Probably not (or I can't remember), but I have the impression that the
syntax is (so far) _very_ similar.

The only difference that come to mind is that Amber does not have byte
arrays
   #[65 66 67]

but it has "inline HashedCollection"
   #{ #foo -> 3. 'bar' -> [3 + 4] value }

Herby

P.S.: Of course, unless new Pharo versions added something completely new...

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/amber-lang/673f7d2d-8295-3a59-364f-c57a80205dc9%40mailbox.sk.