Hi everybody,
This week we have a small patch release of Iceberg, version v1.1.1. This version will be available in the next Pharo build. In summary, this release fixes two issues with the new credentials manager, and introduces a couple of other enhancements/bugfixes. Below you will find the detailed changes log. Enjoy, Guille Integrate Iceberg 1.1.1 https://github.com/pharo-vcs/iceberg/releases/tag/v1.1.1 #864 Repairing Missing repositories lead to wrong source directory
|
Great - thank you! Might be a small patch release - but nonetheless important.
BTW: the links in your mail are pointing to PR's of Pharo and not Iceberg. If you used a template you might want to consider changing it. Gesendet: Montag, 18. Juni 2018 um 17:47 Uhr
Von: "Guillermo Polito" <[hidden email]> An: "Any question about pharo is welcome" <[hidden email]>, "Discusses Development of Pharo" <[hidden email]> Betreff: [Pharo-dev] [Ann] Iceberg v1.1.1 Hi everybody,
This week we have a small patch release of Iceberg, version v1.1.1.
This version will be available in the next Pharo build.
In summary, this release fixes two issues with the new credentials manager, and introduces a couple of other enhancements/bugfixes.
Below you will find the detailed changes log.
Enjoy,
Guille
Integrate Iceberg 1.1.1 https://github.com/pharo-vcs/iceberg/releases/tag/v1.1.1 #864 Repairing Missing repositories lead to wrong source directory
|
Hi, About why 1.1.1 and not 1.2.0. It's not about cheap or not, but about semantics :) We can agree that there is no hard rule on versionning, do we? But I try to follow the following guidelines (delta my own interpretation that adds some subjectivity :P) - Major Version will change when we break backwards compatibility - Minor Version will change when new features are added - Otherwise, patch version will change. So I don't assign a new version number regarding the number of changes but about what they mean... Now, I considered myself this release as a patch because mostly little bugs here and there were fixed. Moreover, one of the changes done in the credentials manager was to *recover* some backwards compatibility for people setting up credentials in settings files. Of course, to this we add to this that my own interpretation saying that the changes do not break compatibility nor add features :) Now, this is the kind of subjective topic that starts a flamewar, but I'd prefer to use my time on somewhat else ^^. In any case, I think it is more important to discuss about the numbering as soon as we have a clear documentation on Iceberg's API... Regarding the bad links, I copy-pasted the text from the PR instead from the release page in Iceberg, which messes up links. Patch version containing the following cleanups and enhancements #864 Repairing Missing repositories lead to wrong source directory Guille On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:12 PM Torsten Bergmann <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Hi,
Indeed. Something went amiss in this email exchange. But, I really do not think that you are in disagreement. Cheers, Doru > On Jun 19, 2018, at 4:09 PM, Christophe Demarey <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi Norbert, > >> Le 19 juin 2018 à 14:06, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> a écrit : >> >> I have no use for an environment where people only care about coding new cool stuff. If it would be like this I would quit all my pharo businesses, move to mainstream and would use pharo only for hobbyist projects because that would be the level that can be met. > > I do not think Guille has this state of mind. He spends time to write lot of tests for code other people wrote (not the funniest part), to clean code in the image (old code, bad dependencies, better API), to improve existing stuff, answering questions on the ML, and so on. > He is one of the few people that really tries to push semantic versioning. He could have made some errors (like everyone) but I find your sentence not fair for him. > > Regards, > Christophe -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "We are all great at making mistakes." |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |