Quantcast

Another ODE question

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Another ODE question

stepharo
SimpleSymplecticSystem is empty too
and no users

SymplecticStepper and subclasses are all empty
and without any users.

I'm puzzled.

did we lose code?

Stef

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Another ODE question

stepharo
DenseOutputStepper is also empty and without subclasses.
So I took the liberty to remove all unused and empty classes with and
unused empty subclasses

May be you can explain to me later.

Stef

Le 26/3/16 15:40, stepharo a écrit :

> SimpleSymplecticSystem is empty too
> and no users
>
> SymplecticStepper and subclasses are all empty
> and without any users.
>
> I'm puzzled.
>
> did we lose code?
>
> Stef
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Another ODE question

SergeStinckwich
I guess only Natalia could help here.

I see that you doing refactorings.
How I can help here ?


On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 4:39 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:

> DenseOutputStepper is also empty and without subclasses.
> So I took the liberty to remove all unused and empty classes with and unused
> empty subclasses
>
> May be you can explain to me later.
>
> Stef
>
> Le 26/3/16 15:40, stepharo a écrit :
>
>> SimpleSymplecticSystem is empty too
>> and no users
>>
>> SymplecticStepper and subclasses are all empty
>> and without any users.
>>
>> I'm puzzled.
>>
>> did we lose code?
>>
>> Stef
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "SciSmalltalk" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [hidden email].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Another ODE question

Natalia Tymchuk
Hi.
I don’t think I created DenseOutputStepper and SimpleSymplecticSystem. And I’m not sure I worked with these classes.

Best regards,
Natalia

> On 26 Mar 2016, at 18:38, Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I guess only Natalia could help here.
>
> I see that you doing refactorings.
> How I can help here ?
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 4:39 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> DenseOutputStepper is also empty and without subclasses.
>> So I took the liberty to remove all unused and empty classes with and unused
>> empty subclasses
>>
>> May be you can explain to me later.
>>
>> Stef
>>
>> Le 26/3/16 15:40, stepharo a écrit :
>>
>>> SimpleSymplecticSystem is empty too
>>> and no users
>>>
>>> SymplecticStepper and subclasses are all empty
>>> and without any users.
>>>
>>> I'm puzzled.
>>>
>>> did we lose code?
>>>
>>> Stef
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "SciSmalltalk" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [hidden email].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
> --
> Serge Stinckwich
> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Another ODE question

stepharo
In reply to this post by SergeStinckwich


Le 26/3/16 18:38, Serge Stinckwich a écrit :
> I guess only Natalia could help here.

not really what I'm doing is quite simple
mov method up, extract common behavior, add a hook, specify hook in
subclasses
remove duplication.
>
> I see that you doing refactorings.
> How I can help here ?

for now I just need to know

if testClusterCovariance

is a good test because this is annoying to have tests that fail randomly

>
>
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 4:39 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> DenseOutputStepper is also empty and without subclasses.
>> So I took the liberty to remove all unused and empty classes with and unused
>> empty subclasses
>>
>> May be you can explain to me later.
>>
>> Stef
>>
>> Le 26/3/16 15:40, stepharo a écrit :
>>
>>> SimpleSymplecticSystem is empty too
>>> and no users
>>>
>>> SymplecticStepper and subclasses are all empty
>>> and without any users.
>>>
>>> I'm puzzled.
>>>
>>> did we lose code?
>>>
>>> Stef
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "SciSmalltalk" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [hidden email].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Another ODE question

djuber
In reply to this post by Natalia Tymchuk
Hi All,

Those classes sound familiar. I may have started with a lot of names,
filled in the ones that do currently have code, and left the others as
to-do markers, that never got done.

I think I was following the structure of odeint
https://github.com/headmyshoulder/odeint-v2 based on a hint Serge provided.

Dan

On 3/26/16 12:52 PM, Natalia Tymchuk wrote:

> Hi.
> I don’t think I created DenseOutputStepper and SimpleSymplecticSystem. And I’m not sure I worked with these classes.
>
> Best regards,
> Natalia
>
>> On 26 Mar 2016, at 18:38, Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> I guess only Natalia could help here.
>>
>> I see that you doing refactorings.
>> How I can help here ?
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 4:39 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> DenseOutputStepper is also empty and without subclasses.
>>> So I took the liberty to remove all unused and empty classes with and unused
>>> empty subclasses
>>>
>>> May be you can explain to me later.
>>>
>>> Stef
>>>
>>> Le 26/3/16 15:40, stepharo a écrit :
>>>
>>>> SimpleSymplecticSystem is empty too
>>>> and no users
>>>>
>>>> SymplecticStepper and subclasses are all empty
>>>> and without any users.
>>>>
>>>> I'm puzzled.
>>>>
>>>> did we lose code?
>>>>
>>>> Stef
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "SciSmalltalk" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to [hidden email].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Serge Stinckwich
>> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
>> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
>> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Another ODE question

stepharo
In reply to this post by Natalia Tymchuk
Ok I removed all the empty classes with no users and empty subclasses
with empty users.

Stef

Le 26/3/16 18:52, Natalia Tymchuk a écrit :

> Hi.
> I don’t think I created DenseOutputStepper and SimpleSymplecticSystem. And I’m not sure I worked with these classes.
>
> Best regards,
> Natalia
>
>> On 26 Mar 2016, at 18:38, Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> I guess only Natalia could help here.
>>
>> I see that you doing refactorings.
>> How I can help here ?
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 4:39 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> DenseOutputStepper is also empty and without subclasses.
>>> So I took the liberty to remove all unused and empty classes with and unused
>>> empty subclasses
>>>
>>> May be you can explain to me later.
>>>
>>> Stef
>>>
>>> Le 26/3/16 15:40, stepharo a écrit :
>>>
>>>> SimpleSymplecticSystem is empty too
>>>> and no users
>>>>
>>>> SymplecticStepper and subclasses are all empty
>>>> and without any users.
>>>>
>>>> I'm puzzled.
>>>>
>>>> did we lose code?
>>>>
>>>> Stef
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "SciSmalltalk" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to [hidden email].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Serge Stinckwich
>> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
>> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
>> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Another ODE question

stepharo
In reply to this post by djuber
thanks daniel :)
it means that people can add them back with code :)



Le 26/3/16 19:09, Daniel Uber a écrit :

> Hi All,
>
> Those classes sound familiar. I may have started with a lot of names,
> filled in the ones that do currently have code, and left the others as
> to-do markers, that never got done.
>
> I think I was following the structure of odeint
> https://github.com/headmyshoulder/odeint-v2 based on a hint Serge provided.
>
> Dan
>
> On 3/26/16 12:52 PM, Natalia Tymchuk wrote:
>> Hi.
>> I don’t think I created DenseOutputStepper and SimpleSymplecticSystem. And I’m not sure I worked with these classes.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Natalia
>>
>>> On 26 Mar 2016, at 18:38, Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I guess only Natalia could help here.
>>>
>>> I see that you doing refactorings.
>>> How I can help here ?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 4:39 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> DenseOutputStepper is also empty and without subclasses.
>>>> So I took the liberty to remove all unused and empty classes with and unused
>>>> empty subclasses
>>>>
>>>> May be you can explain to me later.
>>>>
>>>> Stef
>>>>
>>>> Le 26/3/16 15:40, stepharo a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> SimpleSymplecticSystem is empty too
>>>>> and no users
>>>>>
>>>>> SymplecticStepper and subclasses are all empty
>>>>> and without any users.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm puzzled.
>>>>>
>>>>> did we lose code?
>>>>>
>>>>> Stef
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>>> "SciSmalltalk" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>>> email to [hidden email].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Serge Stinckwich
>>> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
>>> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
>>> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Another ODE question

SergeStinckwich
In reply to this post by stepharo
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 7:09 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
>
> Le 26/3/16 18:38, Serge Stinckwich a écrit :
>>
>> I guess only Natalia could help here.
>
>
> not really what I'm doing is quite simple
> mov method up, extract common behavior, add a hook, specify hook in
> subclasses
> remove duplication.
>>
>>
>> I see that you doing refactorings.
>> How I can help here ?
>
>
> for now I just need to know
>
> if testClusterCovariance
>
> is a good test because this is annoying to have tests that fail randomly

I guess we can remove them because having randomly failing test is annoying.

--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Loading...