Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Users

Another pass on catalog web-site (Styling)

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

4 messages Options

EstebanLM

Another pass on catalog web-site (Styling)

Hi,

I made another pass on catalog web-site. This time I just enhanced a bit the styling… still a lot to do but is looking better and better: http://catalog.pharo.org (you might need a force refresh)

But in fact, this announce is just an excuse to remember you to enhance your configurations with catalog information as described here: http://catalog.pharo.org/catalog/note-for-developers
Also, if your configuration is proved to work on Pharo 3, 4 or 5, please copy your configuration into that repository, to avoid it to appear under “Unstable” tag.

The Catalog is just as good as the information it provides: there is A LOT of very good packages no one will ever notice (like Aconcagua, for example), that does not provide *any* information and therefore they will never be used :(

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE UPDATE YOUR CONFIGURATIONS!

cheers,
Esteban

Uko2

Re: Another pass on catalog web-site (Styling)

Why does it show that QA has only conf. for pharo 5 if it also has one for Pharo 4?

Uko

> On 12 Oct 2015, at 12:25, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I made another pass on catalog web-site. This time I just enhanced a bit the styling… still a lot to do but is looking better and better: http://catalog.pharo.org (you might need a force refresh)
>
> But in fact, this announce is just an excuse to remember you to enhance your configurations with catalog information as described here: http://catalog.pharo.org/catalog/note-for-developers
> Also, if your configuration is proved to work on Pharo 3, 4 or 5, please copy your configuration into that repository, to avoid it to appear under “Unstable” tag.
>
> The Catalog is just as good as the information it provides: there is A LOT of very good packages no one will ever notice (like Aconcagua, for example), that does not provide *any* information and therefore they will never be used :(
>
> PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE UPDATE YOUR CONFIGURATIONS!
>
> cheers,
> Esteban

EstebanLM

Re: Another pass on catalog web-site (Styling)

‘cause catalog does not takes duplicates, just the highest repository.

Esteban

> On 12 Oct 2015, at 12:34, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Why does it show that QA has only conf. for pharo 5 if it also has one for Pharo 4?
>
> Uko
>
>> On 12 Oct 2015, at 12:25, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I made another pass on catalog web-site. This time I just enhanced a bit the styling… still a lot to do but is looking better and better: http://catalog.pharo.org (you might need a force refresh)
>>
>> But in fact, this announce is just an excuse to remember you to enhance your configurations with catalog information as described here: http://catalog.pharo.org/catalog/note-for-developers
>> Also, if your configuration is proved to work on Pharo 3, 4 or 5, please copy your configuration into that repository, to avoid it to appear under “Unstable” tag.
>>
>> The Catalog is just as good as the information it provides: there is A LOT of very good packages no one will ever notice (like Aconcagua, for example), that does not provide *any* information and therefore they will never be used :(
>>
>> PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE UPDATE YOUR CONFIGURATIONS!
>>
>> cheers,
>> Esteban
>
>

Damien Cassou-2

Re: Another pass on catalog web-site (Styling)

Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> writes:

> ‘cause catalog does not takes duplicates, just the highest repository.

this "Pharo X" tag is misleading. I think all compatible Pharo versions
should be displayed or none.

--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill