[BUG] Issue 945 still can be reproduced

Hi all,

I've just checked in the latest dev image (10.01.1). The bug
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=945 is still there
despite it was marked as 'closed' in the tracker.
Btw, Squeak Trunk incorporated not nil check as a workaround. I also
did it in my working image (as many other people, I think). So why
doesn't Pharo do the same at least until the right fix will be
proposed?

I bother you with it because I believe it prevents Pharo to gain new
users (at least those who mostly uses Windows platform).


George

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

On Jan 18, 2010, at 10:13 AM, George Herolyants wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I've just checked in the latest dev image (10.01.1). The bug
> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=945 is still there
> despite it was marked as 'closed' in the tracker.
> Btw, Squeak Trunk incorporated not nil check as a workaround. I also
> did it in my working image (as many other people, I think).

Did you publish a slice? or is it in your cs?
isNil is a way to often turn around the problem.


> So why
> doesn't Pharo do the same at least until the right fix will be
> proposed?

time. time time time time time time time time
Probably and knowledge sometimes. This system is also complex :)


> I bother you with it because I believe it prevents Pharo to gain new
> users (at least those who mostly uses Windows platform).

Thanks george we will have a look!
>
>
> George
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Hi. I was who reported that issue. If you can see, on Dec 07, 2009  I commented:   "

yes, true. I would attach the fix in both 1.0 and 1.1

"

I cannot do any more. I put it as Milestone-1.0 and fixed.

Hope someone may integrate this so that it can be included in the next dev image I will build.

Cheers

Mariano



_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

2010/1/18 Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]>:
>
> Did you publish a slice? or is it in your cs?
> isNil is a way to often turn around the problem.

I've published it as an st file on the tracker
(http://pharo.googlecode.com/issues/attachment?aid=1897434323002707823&name=PasteUpMorph-dropFiles.st).
The workaround affects only one method.

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

ok we will integrate it in the next batch

On Jan 18, 2010, at 10:31 AM, George Herolyants wrote:


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

2010/1/18 Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]>:
> ok we will integrate it in the next batch

Thank you!

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project