If you copy a Selection in the Paragraph-Editor and then change the
selection (just click somewhere else) and then do an 'Undo' the copied selection is pasted at the place of the current one. You can check this in a normal system browser. I checked this behaviour in VW 7.3.1 and VW 7.4. Volker Volker.Zink.vcf (328 bytes) Download Attachment |
Volker
VW has worked this way for as long as I can remember. Terry =========================================================== Terry Raymond Smalltalk Professional Debug Package Crafted Smalltalk 80 Lazywood Ln. Tiverton, RI 02878 (401) 624-4517 [hidden email] <http://www.craftedsmalltalk.com> =========================================================== > -----Original Message----- > From: Volker Zink [mailto:[hidden email]] > Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 3:38 AM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: [BUG] Wrong Undo in Paragraph-Editor > > If you copy a Selection in the Paragraph-Editor and then change the > selection (just click somewhere else) and then do an 'Undo' the copied > selection is pasted at the place of the current one. You can check this > in a normal system browser. > > I checked this behaviour in VW 7.3.1 and VW 7.4. > > Volker |
Terry Raymond wrote:
> Volker > > VW has worked this way for as long as I can remember. True. I believe this undo behavior dates all the way back to Smalltalk-80. However, it would be really nice to have a more modern undo behavior. I tend to favor the Emacs undo model. Is there a feature request for this filed somewhere? -Martin |
Martin McClure wrote:
> Terry Raymond wrote: >> Volker >> >> VW has worked this way for as long as I can remember. > > True. I believe this undo behavior dates all the way back to > Smalltalk-80. > > However, it would be really nice to have a more modern undo behavior. > I tend to favor the Emacs undo model. Is there a feature request for > this filed somewhere? I am currently testing a full undo implementation. It seems to work fine. I'll post it here, should it survive the weekend (currently I am doing heavy text editing for localization - should be a good burn-in test). Andre |
In reply to this post by Martin McClure
Martin,
> However, it would be really nice to have a more modern undo > behavior. I tend to favor the Emacs undo model. Is there a feature > request for this filed somewhere? Of course. It is not only out there, it's done, in Pollock. Unlimited Undo/Redo. Including capturing changes to attributes of the text (color, emphasis, etc.) And So It Goes Sames ______________________________________________________________________ Samuel S. Shuster [|] VisualWorks Engineering, GUI Project Smalltalk Enables Success -- What Are YOU Using? |
Samuel S. Shuster wrote:
> Martin, > >> However, it would be really nice to have a more modern undo behavior. >> I tend to favor the Emacs undo model. Is there a feature request for >> this filed somewhere? > > Of course. It is not only out there, it's done, in Pollock. Unlimited > Undo/Redo. Including capturing changes to attributes of the text (color, > emphasis, etc.) I should have known :-) I'm glad to hear it. -Martin |
In reply to this post by Volker Zink
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Martin McClure wrote: > > However, it would be really nice to have a more modern undo behavior. > > I tend to favor the Emacs undo model. Is there a feature request for > > this filed somewhere? > > I am currently testing a full undo implementation. It seems to work > fine. I'll post it here, should it survive the weekend (currently I am > doing heavy text editing for localization - should be a good burn-in test). Brilliant! I was just thinking that somebody must have made one. Please, please make this available in the public Store with an unencumbered license. And Cincom should send you a nice T-shirt or whatever if you let them put it in the base. Or maybe we should send Cincom T-shirts until they agree to put it in the base? :-) To be blunt, I can't think of another development environment / graphics widget set that would have such a broken text editor widget. It's great that Pollock is correcting this, but it's even better if we can have something now! Steve |
In reply to this post by Samuel S. Shuster <sames@interaccess.com>
Great,
Would it be possible to retrofit the existing textView with that functionality ? --Mark Samuel S. Shuster wrote: > Martin, > >> However, it would be really nice to have a more modern undo behavior. >> I tend to favor the Emacs undo model. Is there a feature request for >> this filed somewhere? > > > Of course. It is not only out there, it's done, in Pollock. Unlimited > Undo/Redo. Including capturing changes to attributes of the text > (color, emphasis, etc.) > > And So It Goes > Sames > ______________________________________________________________________ > > Samuel S. Shuster [|] > VisualWorks Engineering, GUI Project > Smalltalk Enables Success -- What Are YOU Using? > > > > > |
Mark,
> Would it be possible to retrofit the existing textView with that > functionality ? No. Well, that's not strictly true. Anything is possible. ParagraphEditor is a horror show. It is one among about 100,000 equally scary reasons why Pollock HAD to be done. And So It Goes Sames ______________________________________________________________________ Samuel S. Shuster [|] VisualWorks Engineering, GUI Project Smalltalk Enables Success -- What Are YOU Using? |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |