Basic visualization queries
Locked
 
|
Hi,
While brainstorming the project Moose-on-the-Web (providing a moose interface on the web), we thought about putting a few basic/common visualization queries on the web. These queries will allow users to have an understanding of their system without trying different combinations of elements (packages, class, methods, etc.) and different combinations of visualizations (UML diagram, class blue-print, etc.). So, we thought to take a feedback from the people on this list regarding the common visualizations they find useful for a potential user of the system.
Can you please provide a list of three visualizations that you think can be useful for a user for his/her system?
thanx
Usman
Post-Doc at RMoD Team
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: Basic visualization queries
|
|
The idea is
what are the three scenario that we could put by default. We were thinking about a dashboard at package level. Stef On Jan 26, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Usman Bhatti wrote: > Hi, > > While brainstorming the project Moose-on-the-Web (providing a moose interface on the web), we thought about putting a few basic/common visualization queries on the web. These queries will allow users to have an understanding of their system without trying different combinations of elements (packages, class, methods, etc.) and different combinations of visualizations (UML diagram, class blue-print, etc.). So, we thought to take a feedback from the people on this list regarding the common visualizations they find useful for a potential user of the system. > > Can you please provide a list of three visualizations that you think can be useful for a user for his/her system? > > thanx > > Usman > > Post-Doc at RMoD Team > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: Basic visualization queries
|
|
In reply to this post by Usman Bhatti
> Can you please provide a list of three visualizations that you think can be useful for a user for his/her system?
The visualization I personally often use are: - Distribution map - Test blueprint (the one from Hapao) - Ad-hoc visualization that shows me the package dependencies There is a SVG exporter for Mondrian, it may be useful for your project. > Post-Doc at RMoD Team You do a postdoc with Stef, cool! Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: Basic visualization queries
|
|
On Jan 26, 2011, at 9:30 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> Can you please provide a list of three visualizations that you think can be useful for a user for his/her system? > > The visualization I personally often use are: > - Distribution map with what? > - Test blueprint (the one from Hapao) > - Ad-hoc visualization that shows me the package dependencies > > There is a SVG exporter for Mondrian, it may be useful for your project. > >> Post-Doc at RMoD Team > > You do a postdoc with Stef, cool! > > Alexandre > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: Basic visualization queries
|
|
>>> Can you please provide a list of three visualizations that you think can be useful for a user for his/her system?
>> >> The visualization I personally often use are: >> - Distribution map > with what? It really depends of the customer. For a case study with a company we checked short and long methods. We also checked methods having a particular pattern in it. In Mondrian we used matching of instances variable with '*cache*'. I feel that many visualizations, and in particular distribution map have to be configurable. Cheers, Alexandre > >> - Test blueprint (the one from Hapao) >> - Ad-hoc visualization that shows me the package dependencies >> >> There is a SVG exporter for Mondrian, it may be useful for your project. >> >>> Post-Doc at RMoD Team >> >> You do a postdoc with Stef, cool! >> >> Alexandre >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by Usman Bhatti
- an intuitive layer-based viz (layertable is nice but not intuitive, a bit like cycletable) Would be nice to have that for Menssana too On 26 janv. 2011, at 18:41, Usman Bhatti wrote: > Hi, > > While brainstorming the project Moose-on-the-Web (providing a moose interface on the web), we thought about putting a few basic/common visualization queries on the web. These queries will allow users to have an understanding of their system without trying different combinations of elements (packages, class, methods, etc.) and different combinations of visualizations (UML diagram, class blue-print, etc.). So, we thought to take a feedback from the people on this list regarding the common visualizations they find useful for a potential user of the system. > > Can you please provide a list of three visualizations that you think can be useful for a user for his/her system? > > thanx > > Usman > > Post-Doc at RMoD Team > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- Simon Denier _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
I think that some of the ideas of AspectMaps could be backported to the polymetric views visualization: dynamically selecting the metrics for width and height, and having a structural zoom on the contents of the classes. See the screencast http://pleiad.cl/research/software/aspectmaps_struct_zoom to see what the latter means. For an idea of how nice the former is to work with, see http://pleiad.cl/research/software/aspectmaps_ui at about the 3:30 mark ... On 26 Jan 2011, at 20:10, Simon Denier wrote: > > - an intuitive layer-based viz (layertable is nice but not intuitive, a bit like cycletable) > > Would be nice to have that for Menssana too > > > On 26 janv. 2011, at 18:41, Usman Bhatti wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> While brainstorming the project Moose-on-the-Web (providing a moose interface on the web), we thought about putting a few basic/common visualization queries on the web. These queries will allow users to have an understanding of their system without trying different combinations of elements (packages, class, methods, etc.) and different combinations of visualizations (UML diagram, class blue-print, etc.). So, we thought to take a feedback from the people on this list regarding the common visualizations they find useful for a potential user of the system. >> >> Can you please provide a list of three visualizations that you think can be useful for a user for his/her system? >> >> thanx >> >> Usman >> >> Post-Doc at RMoD Team >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > Simon Denier > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- Johan Fabry [hidden email] - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
For the customizable system complexity, there already is a browser in:
FAMIXClassGroup>>viewSystemComplexityInWizard or from the menu: ClassGroup / Visualize / Customizable System Compexity Cheers, Doru On 27 Jan 2011, at 16:58, Johan Fabry wrote: > > I think that some of the ideas of AspectMaps could be backported to the polymetric views visualization: dynamically selecting the metrics for width and height, and having a structural zoom on the contents of the classes. See the screencast http://pleiad.cl/research/software/aspectmaps_struct_zoom to see what the latter means. For an idea of how nice the former is to work with, see http://pleiad.cl/research/software/aspectmaps_ui at about the 3:30 mark ... > > On 26 Jan 2011, at 20:10, Simon Denier wrote: > >> >> - an intuitive layer-based viz (layertable is nice but not intuitive, a bit like cycletable) >> >> Would be nice to have that for Menssana too >> >> >> On 26 janv. 2011, at 18:41, Usman Bhatti wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> While brainstorming the project Moose-on-the-Web (providing a moose interface on the web), we thought about putting a few basic/common visualization queries on the web. These queries will allow users to have an understanding of their system without trying different combinations of elements (packages, class, methods, etc.) and different combinations of visualizations (UML diagram, class blue-print, etc.). So, we thought to take a feedback from the people on this list regarding the common visualizations they find useful for a potential user of the system. >>> >>> Can you please provide a list of three visualizations that you think can be useful for a user for his/her system? >>> >>> thanx >>> >>> Usman >>> >>> Post-Doc at RMoD Team >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> -- >> Simon Denier >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > Johan Fabry > [hidden email] - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry > PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "If you interrupt the barber while he is cutting your hair, you will end up with a messy haircut." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
OK so you just need to add the structural zoom to that :-) On 27 Jan 2011, at 13:04, Tudor Girba wrote: > For the customizable system complexity, there already is a browser in: > FAMIXClassGroup>>viewSystemComplexityInWizard > > or from the menu: > ClassGroup / Visualize / Customizable System Compexity > > Cheers, > Doru > > > > On 27 Jan 2011, at 16:58, Johan Fabry wrote: > >> >> I think that some of the ideas of AspectMaps could be backported to the polymetric views visualization: dynamically selecting the metrics for width and height, and having a structural zoom on the contents of the classes. See the screencast http://pleiad.cl/research/software/aspectmaps_struct_zoom to see what the latter means. For an idea of how nice the former is to work with, see http://pleiad.cl/research/software/aspectmaps_ui at about the 3:30 mark ... > -- Johan Fabry [hidden email] - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: Basic visualization queries
|
|
What the system complexity offers is a blueprint of the class where the mouse if waving upon.
Cheers, Alexandre On 27 Jan 2011, at 13:54, Johan Fabry wrote: > > OK so you just need to add the structural zoom to that :-) > > On 27 Jan 2011, at 13:04, Tudor Girba wrote: > >> For the customizable system complexity, there already is a browser in: >> FAMIXClassGroup>>viewSystemComplexityInWizard >> >> or from the menu: >> ClassGroup / Visualize / Customizable System Compexity >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> >> On 27 Jan 2011, at 16:58, Johan Fabry wrote: >> >>> >>> I think that some of the ideas of AspectMaps could be backported to the polymetric views visualization: dynamically selecting the metrics for width and height, and having a structural zoom on the contents of the classes. See the screencast http://pleiad.cl/research/software/aspectmaps_struct_zoom to see what the latter means. For an idea of how nice the former is to work with, see http://pleiad.cl/research/software/aspectmaps_ui at about the 3:30 mark ... >> > > -- > Johan Fabry > [hidden email] - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry > PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
«
Return to Moose
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |