Behavior of HashedCollection>>do:

> Hi all,
>
> I just discovered that HashedCollection>>do: only iterates over the
> values of the collection.
> In contrast, Pharo Smalltalk iterates over the associations when
> calling HashedCollection>>do:.
>
> What is the opinion on changing the behavior?
> It would ease a refactoring I am currently doing in Amber.
>
> Best,
> Manfred

> Hi!
>
> HashedCollection in Amber is quite Amber specific: it represent a map
> with strings as keys. And for consistency with Dictionary, I'm quite
> happy with the current behavior.
>
> Cheers,
> Nico
>
> Manfred Kröhnert <[hidden email]> writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just discovered that HashedCollection>>do: only iterates over the
>> values of the collection.
>> In contrast, Pharo Smalltalk iterates over the associations when
>> calling HashedCollection>>do:.
>>
>> What is the opinion on changing the behavior?
>> It would ease a refactoring I am currently doing in Amber.
>>
>> Best,
>> Manfred
>
> --
> Nicolas Petton
> http://nicolas-petton.fr