Esteban A. Maringolo schrieb:
> Günther Schmidt escribió:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just finished reading Kent Becks "Best Practise Patterns" for the
>> first time, but the big revelation I had hoped for didn't happened.
>
>
> I've been there.
Donde estas ahora?
Esteban, do you mean to say that by now you managed to become "more
advanced"? If so please tell me how, because I for sure don't know how
to get there.
When I started with Smalltalk it was difficult enough to find literature
/ Websites where you could acquire just the basics, but finding books
that will teach you some advanced stuff is even harder. I mean there's
fragments of information all over the place but I haven't yet found a
compilation. I've recently ordered the "The Design Patterns Smalltalk
Companion" and "SmallTalk, Objects, and Design" from Amazon, they'll be
here in a couple of days, and I hope they'll give me more clues.
Do you have any hints for me?
Günther
>
>> Some of the things in that book seemed rather obvious to me.
>
>
>> What did I miss?
>
>
> Probably nothing, considering what you say (and not knowing exactly what
> you learn).
>
> A pattern is just that, a perception of repetitive "something".
> The patterns emerge when they're recognized, they're not "invented".
>
> The practical use of patterns is the syntesis of concepts in one or few
> words. When I say you "I've implemented it using a singleton", it's enough.
>
> To my opinion the only useful thing in the patterns is that.
> The unicity of concept it represents, when you want to explain or talk
> about something you do or are planning to.
>
> Or... if you found a pattern in what you're doing, you can "READ" it's
> description/definition to, perhaps, know if your going to the same place.
>
> But as stated above, the pattern emerges, you do not build taking it as
> a rule. But, because it is a pattern, is common that you use them
> several times, an your colleagues too.
>
> Best regards.
>
>
Locked
