[Better Comment Initiative]: CustomSourceLanguage

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Better Comment Initiative]: CustomSourceLanguage

Stéphane Ducasse
We have
-------
FAMIXCustomSourceLanguage has not been documented yet. The class comment should describe the purpose of the class, its collaborations and its variables.

Instance Variables:
        name <ProtoObject | PseudoContext>

We can get
---------

@@I represent specific source language that is not a language supported by default by moose?@@


Then the comment of name is unclear to me?
what is a language that is not explicitly modeled?

name
        <MSEProperty: #name type: #String>
        <MSEComment: 'The name of a custom language that is not modeled explicitly.'>



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Better Comment Initiative]: CustomSourceLanguage

Stéphane Ducasse
So I will add

I represent specific source language that is not a language supported by default by moose.



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Better Comment Initiative]: CustomSourceLanguage

Tudor Girba-2
Sounds good.

Dori



On Sep 27, 2011, at 14:59, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:

> So I will add
>
> I represent specific source language that is not a language supported by default by moose.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev