Bidding farewell to Google Code

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bidding farewell to Google Code

abergel
Hi!

This will have an impact on us.

http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html

Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Bidding farewell to Google Code

Offray
Hi,

Thats another reason to choose the Indie Web[1], instead of centralized
one. In the case of source code repositories, my bet is for
Fossil-SCM[2]. It's self-contained, minimal (~1mb for DVCS, Wiki and bug
tracker and web interface) and runs almost anywhere.

[1] http://indiewebcamp.com/
[2] http://fossil-scm.org/

Just my two cents.

Cheers,

Offray


El 12/03/15 a las 16:05, Alexandre Bergel escribió:
> Hi!
>
> This will have an impact on us.
>
> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html
>
> Alexandre
>


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Bidding farewell to Google Code

abergel
But, what is wrong in using a github project for the issues ?

Alexandre
-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



On Mar 12, 2015, at 7:52 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

Thats another reason to choose the Indie Web[1], instead of centralized one. In the case of source code repositories, my bet is for Fossil-SCM[2]. It's self-contained, minimal (~1mb for DVCS, Wiki and bug tracker and web interface) and runs almost anywhere.

[1] http://indiewebcamp.com/
[2] http://fossil-scm.org/

Just my two cents.

Cheers,

Offray


El 12/03/15 a las 16:05, Alexandre Bergel escribió:
Hi!

This will have an impact on us.

http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html

Alexandre



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Bidding farewell to Google Code

Offray
Github follows the current trend of the web of "user generated data"
which has value in "centralized metadata". In this case data is the code
and metadata are all conversations about it (including tickets, issues
conversations and so on) that rely on a lock-in infrastructure. You can
move your code, but metadata will be still centralized. With fossil all
data is decentralized and less dependent on a single provider. This
gives more resilience. The only issue is that the interface of fossil is
more "raw" compared with the one of github.

For me keeping the web away of centralization in cases like this is
better that relying of few places for discovery and deployment (Google,
Amazon, Facebook, GitHub).

Cheers,

Offray

El 12/03/15 a las 18:25, Alexandre Bergel escribió:

> But, what is wrong in using a github project for the issues ?
>
> Alexandre
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>> On Mar 12, 2015, at 7:52 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas <[hidden email]
>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thats another reason to choose the Indie Web[1], instead of centralized one.
>> In the case of source code repositories, my bet is for Fossil-SCM[2]. It's
>> self-contained, minimal (~1mb for DVCS, Wiki and bug tracker and web
>> interface) and runs almost anywhere.
>>
>> [1] http://indiewebcamp.com/
>> [2] http://fossil-scm.org/
>>
>> Just my two cents.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Offray
>>
>>
>> El 12/03/15 a las 16:05, Alexandre Bergel escribió:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> This will have an impact on us.
>>>
>>> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html
>>>
>>> Alexandre
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Bidding farewell to Google Code

SergeStinckwich
In reply to this post by abergel
I guess Doru will choose the appropriate platform for him, but +1 for
using github issues.
Apparently there is a Google 2 github exporter:
https://code.google.com/export-to-github/


On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Alexandre Bergel
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> But, what is wrong in using a github project for the issues ?
>
> Alexandre
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
> On Mar 12, 2015, at 7:52 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thats another reason to choose the Indie Web[1], instead of centralized one.
> In the case of source code repositories, my bet is for Fossil-SCM[2]. It's
> self-contained, minimal (~1mb for DVCS, Wiki and bug tracker and web
> interface) and runs almost anywhere.
>
> [1] http://indiewebcamp.com/
> [2] http://fossil-scm.org/
>
> Just my two cents.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Offray
>
>
> El 12/03/15 a las 16:05, Alexandre Bergel escribió:
>
> Hi!
>
> This will have an impact on us.
>
> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html
>
> Alexandre
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>



--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Bidding farewell to Google Code

Stephan Eggermont-3


On 13-03-15 09:40, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
> I guess Doru will choose the appropriate platform for him, but +1 for
> using github issues.
> Apparently there is a Google 2 github exporter:
> https://code.google.com/export-to-github/

That doesn't work for moose. It only allows 1000 issues to be migrated.

Stephan
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev