Hi!
This will have an impact on us. http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Hi,
Thats another reason to choose the Indie Web[1], instead of centralized one. In the case of source code repositories, my bet is for Fossil-SCM[2]. It's self-contained, minimal (~1mb for DVCS, Wiki and bug tracker and web interface) and runs almost anywhere. [1] http://indiewebcamp.com/ [2] http://fossil-scm.org/ Just my two cents. Cheers, Offray El 12/03/15 a las 16:05, Alexandre Bergel escribió: > Hi! > > This will have an impact on us. > > http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html > > Alexandre > _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
But, what is wrong in using a github project for the issues ?
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Github follows the current trend of the web of "user generated data"
which has value in "centralized metadata". In this case data is the code and metadata are all conversations about it (including tickets, issues conversations and so on) that rely on a lock-in infrastructure. You can move your code, but metadata will be still centralized. With fossil all data is decentralized and less dependent on a single provider. This gives more resilience. The only issue is that the interface of fossil is more "raw" compared with the one of github. For me keeping the web away of centralization in cases like this is better that relying of few places for discovery and deployment (Google, Amazon, Facebook, GitHub). Cheers, Offray El 12/03/15 a las 18:25, Alexandre Bergel escribió: > But, what is wrong in using a github project for the issues ? > > Alexandre > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > >> On Mar 12, 2015, at 7:52 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas <[hidden email] >> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Thats another reason to choose the Indie Web[1], instead of centralized one. >> In the case of source code repositories, my bet is for Fossil-SCM[2]. It's >> self-contained, minimal (~1mb for DVCS, Wiki and bug tracker and web >> interface) and runs almost anywhere. >> >> [1] http://indiewebcamp.com/ >> [2] http://fossil-scm.org/ >> >> Just my two cents. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Offray >> >> >> El 12/03/15 a las 16:05, Alexandre Bergel escribió: >>> Hi! >>> >>> This will have an impact on us. >>> >>> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html >>> >>> Alexandre >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
In reply to this post by abergel
I guess Doru will choose the appropriate platform for him, but +1 for
using github issues. Apparently there is a Google 2 github exporter: https://code.google.com/export-to-github/ On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote: > But, what is wrong in using a github project for the issues ? > > Alexandre > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > On Mar 12, 2015, at 7:52 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas > <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Thats another reason to choose the Indie Web[1], instead of centralized one. > In the case of source code repositories, my bet is for Fossil-SCM[2]. It's > self-contained, minimal (~1mb for DVCS, Wiki and bug tracker and web > interface) and runs almost anywhere. > > [1] http://indiewebcamp.com/ > [2] http://fossil-scm.org/ > > Just my two cents. > > Cheers, > > Offray > > > El 12/03/15 a las 16:05, Alexandre Bergel escribió: > > Hi! > > This will have an impact on us. > > http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html > > Alexandre > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
On 13-03-15 09:40, Serge Stinckwich wrote: > I guess Doru will choose the appropriate platform for him, but +1 for > using github issues. > Apparently there is a Google 2 github exporter: > https://code.google.com/export-to-github/ That doesn't work for moose. It only allows 1000 issues to be migrated. Stephan _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |