Bloated image again. Memory leak?
Locked
Bloated image again. Memory leak?
 
|
Hi guys,
I have this problem (http://forum.world.st/Huge-image-td4876854.html), now the image grow about 100MB per week and the suggestions shown on http://forum.world.st/Huge-image-td4876854.html don't work I'm on Pharo 5 on a mac. I suspect it is something related to GLMPanePort, see the attached jpg Can you help me please? TIA Davide <http://forum.world.st/file/n4951861/huge_image2.jpg> -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Bloated-image-again-Memory-leak-tp4951861.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
Re: Bloated image again. Memory leak?
|
|
Phil
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Re: Bloated image again. Memory leak?
|
|
Thank you very much Phil,
Your code works! The image went from 600MB to 80MB I'm wondering why there is no bug record about GLMPanePort on https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/search/?sSearchFor=GLMPanePort nor a fix. Nobody has this issue, but you and me? I'm puzzled. Anyway Thank you very much Davide philippeback wrote > Check > > https://gist.github.com/philippeback/39c63bb5aa26b79098511cdfea4fea7e > > Phil > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users < > pharo-users@.pharo >> wrote: > >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Davide Varvello < > varvello@ > > >> To: > pharo-users@.pharo >> Cc: >> Bcc: >> Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 23:45:32 -0700 (PDT) >> Subject: Bloated image again. Memory leak? >> Hi guys, >> I have this problem (http://forum.world.st/Huge-image-td4876854.html), >> now >> the image grow about 100MB per week and the suggestions shown on >> http://forum.world.st/Huge-image-td4876854.html don't work >> >> I'm on Pharo 5 on a mac. >> >> I suspect it is something related to GLMPanePort, see the attached jpg >> Can you help me please? >> >> TIA >> Davide >> >> >> <http://forum.world.st/file/n4951861/huge_image2.jpg> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Bloated- >> image-again-Memory-leak-tp4951861.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Bloated-image-again-Memory-leak-tp4951862p4951885.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
Re: Bloated image again. Memory leak?
|
|
In reply to this post by philippeback
Thank you very much Phil,
Your code works! The image went from 600MB to 80MB I'm wondering why there is no bug record about GLMPanePort on https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/search/?sSearchFor=GLMPanePort nor a fix. Nobody has this issue, but you and me? I'm puzzled. Anyway Thank you very much Davide
|
|
|
In reply to this post by Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list
I think because this was a more general bug that *should* be fixed on Pharo 6. cheers! Esteban
|
Re: Bloated image again. Memory leak?
|
|
In reply to this post by Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users <[hidden email]> wrote:
I suffered from such a thing for a long time, and thanks to Clément and Pavel, we are not having to suffer that bloat anymore :-) This article is worth a read for making things fast(er) in some cases (if you got to 600MB then you were inspecting decently sized collections): Phil I'm wondering why there is no bug record about GLMPanePort on |
Re: Bloated image again. Memory leak?
|
|
In reply to this post by EstebanLM
What is the more general problem esteban?
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: > > On 19 Jun 2017, at 11:52, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users > <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > From: Davide Varvello <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: Bloated image again. Memory leak? > Date: 19 June 2017 at 11:52:08 GMT+2 > To: [hidden email] > > > Thank you very much Phil, > Your code works! The image went from 600MB to 80MB > > I'm wondering why there is no bug record about GLMPanePort on > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/search/?sSearchFor=GLMPanePort nor a fix. Nobody > has this issue, but you and me? I'm puzzled. > > > I think because this was a more general bug that *should* be fixed on Pharo > 6. > > cheers! > Esteban > > > Anyway > Thank you very much > Davide > > > philippeback wrote > > Check > > https://gist.github.com/philippeback/39c63bb5aa26b79098511cdfea4fea7e > > Phil > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users < > > > pharo-users@.pharo > > > wrote: > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Davide Varvello < > > > varvello@ > > > > > > To: > > > pharo-users@.pharo > > > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 23:45:32 -0700 (PDT) > Subject: Bloated image again. Memory leak? > Hi guys, > I have this problem (http://forum.world.st/Huge-image-td4876854.html), > now > the image grow about 100MB per week and the suggestions shown on > http://forum.world.st/Huge-image-td4876854.html don't work > > I'm on Pharo 5 on a mac. > > I suspect it is something related to GLMPanePort, see the attached jpg > Can you help me please? > > TIA > Davide > > > <http://forum.world.st/file/n4951861/huge_image2.jpg> > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Bloated- > image-again-Memory-leak-tp4951861.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Bloated-image-again-Memory-leak-tp4951862p4951885.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > |
|
|
> On 20 Jun 2017, at 08:16, Stephane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: > > What is the more general problem esteban? what *was* the general problem: there was a leak on glamour :) Esteban > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> On 19 Jun 2017, at 11:52, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> >> From: Davide Varvello <[hidden email]> >> Subject: Re: Bloated image again. Memory leak? >> Date: 19 June 2017 at 11:52:08 GMT+2 >> To: [hidden email] >> >> >> Thank you very much Phil, >> Your code works! The image went from 600MB to 80MB >> >> I'm wondering why there is no bug record about GLMPanePort on >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/search/?sSearchFor=GLMPanePort nor a fix. Nobody >> has this issue, but you and me? I'm puzzled. >> >> >> I think because this was a more general bug that *should* be fixed on Pharo >> 6. >> >> cheers! >> Esteban >> >> >> Anyway >> Thank you very much >> Davide >> >> >> philippeback wrote >> >> Check >> >> https://gist.github.com/philippeback/39c63bb5aa26b79098511cdfea4fea7e >> >> Phil >> >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users < >> >> >> pharo-users@.pharo >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Davide Varvello < >> >> >> varvello@ >> >> >> > >> >> To: >> >> >> pharo-users@.pharo >> >> >> Cc: >> Bcc: >> Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 23:45:32 -0700 (PDT) >> Subject: Bloated image again. Memory leak? >> Hi guys, >> I have this problem (http://forum.world.st/Huge-image-td4876854.html), >> now >> the image grow about 100MB per week and the suggestions shown on >> http://forum.world.st/Huge-image-td4876854.html don't work >> >> I'm on Pharo 5 on a mac. >> >> I suspect it is something related to GLMPanePort, see the attached jpg >> Can you help me please? >> >> TIA >> Davide >> >> >> <http://forum.world.st/file/n4951861/huge_image2.jpg> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Bloated- >> image-again-Memory-leak-tp4951861.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/Bloated-image-again-Memory-leak-tp4951862p4951885.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > |
Re: Bloated image again. Memory leak?
|
|
In reply to this post by EstebanLM
Fine
Davide EstebanLM wrote >> On 19 Jun 2017, at 11:52, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users < > pharo-users@.pharo > > wrote: >> >> >> From: Davide Varvello < > varvello@ > <mailto: > varvello@ > >> >> Subject: Re: Bloated image again. Memory leak? >> Date: 19 June 2017 at 11:52:08 GMT+2 >> To: > pharo-users@.pharo > <mailto: > pharo-users@.pharo > > >> >> >> Thank you very much Phil, >> Your code works! The image went from 600MB to 80MB >> >> I'm wondering why there is no bug record about GLMPanePort on >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/search/?sSearchFor=GLMPanePort >> <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/search/?sSearchFor=GLMPanePort> nor a >> fix. Nobody >> has this issue, but you and me? I'm puzzled. > > I think because this was a more general bug that *should* be fixed on > Pharo 6. > > cheers! > Esteban > >> >> Anyway >> Thank you very much >> Davide >> >> >> philippeback wrote >>> Check >>> >>> https://gist.github.com/philippeback/39c63bb5aa26b79098511cdfea4fea7e >>> <https://gist.github.com/philippeback/39c63bb5aa26b79098511cdfea4fea7e> >>> >>> Phil >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users < >> >>> pharo-users@.pharo >> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: Davide Varvello < >> >>> varvello@ >> >>> > >>>> To: >> >>> pharo-users@.pharo >> >>>> Cc: >>>> Bcc: >>>> Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 23:45:32 -0700 (PDT) >>>> Subject: Bloated image again. Memory leak? >>>> Hi guys, >>>> I have this problem (http://forum.world.st/Huge-image-td4876854.html), >>>> now >>>> the image grow about 100MB per week and the suggestions shown on >>>> http://forum.world.st/Huge-image-td4876854.html don't work >>>> >>>> I'm on Pharo 5 on a mac. >>>> >>>> I suspect it is something related to GLMPanePort, see the attached jpg >>>> Can you help me please? >>>> >>>> TIA >>>> Davide >>>> >>>> >>>> <http://forum.world.st/file/n4951861/huge_image2.jpg> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Bloated- >>>> image-again-Memory-leak-tp4951861.html >>>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/Bloated-image-again-Memory-leak-tp4951862p4951885.html >> <http://forum.world.st/Bloated-image-again-Memory-leak-tp4951862p4951885.html> >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com >> <http://nabble.com/>. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Bloated-image-again-Memory-leak-tp4951862p4951973.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
Re: Bloated image again. Memory leak?
|
|
In reply to this post by EstebanLM
Fine
Davide
|
Re: Bloated image again. Memory leak?
|
|
In reply to this post by philippeback
Thanks for the article Phil and yep I generate many reports from the inspection of a lot of collections
Davide
|
Re: Bloated image again. Memory leak?
|
|
In reply to this post by philippeback
Thanks for the article Phil and yep I generate many reports from the
inspection of a lot of collections Davide philippeback wrote > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users < > pharo-users@.pharo >> wrote: > >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Davide Varvello < > varvello@ > > >> To: > pharo-users@.pharo >> Cc: >> Bcc: >> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 02:52:08 -0700 (PDT) >> Subject: Re: Bloated image again. Memory leak? >> Thank you very much Phil, >> Your code works! The image went from 600MB to 80MB >> > > I suffered from such a thing for a long time, and thanks to Clément and > Pavel, we are not having to suffer that bloat anymore :-) > > This article is worth a read for making things fast(er) in some cases (if > you got to 600MB then you were inspecting decently sized collections): > https://clementbera.wordpress.com/2017/03/12/tuning-the-pharo-garbage-collector/ > > Phil > -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Bloated-image-again-Memory-leak-tp4951862p4951975.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
«
Return to Pharo Smalltalk Users
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |