[Bloc] ing versus er

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bloc] ing versus er

stepharo
wrapContent
     self resizing: BlLayoutWrapContentResizing new

I will rename such code to be

wrapContent
     self resizer: BlLayoutWrapContentResizer new


BlLayoutWrapContentResizer is a strategy (and object responsible of
doing something)
and as such it is much better to use er and ing.

Comment if needed.
Stef

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Bloc] ing versus er

Aliaksei Syrel

Thanks for looking into bloc! :)

On Mar 6, 2016 10:20 AM, "stepharo" <[hidden email]> wrote:
wrapContent
    self resizing: BlLayoutWrapContentResizing new

I will rename such code to be

wrapContent
    self resizer: BlLayoutWrapContentResizer new


BlLayoutWrapContentResizer is a strategy (and object responsible of doing something)
and as such it is much better to use er and ing.

Comment if needed.
Stef

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Bloc] ing versus er

stepharo
Thanks for doing it ;)

Stef


Le 6/3/16 10:27, Aliaksei Syrel a écrit :

Thanks for looking into bloc! :)

On Mar 6, 2016 10:20 AM, "stepharo" <[hidden email]> wrote:
wrapContent
    self resizing: BlLayoutWrapContentResizing new

I will rename such code to be

wrapContent
    self resizer: BlLayoutWrapContentResizer new


BlLayoutWrapContentResizer is a strategy (and object responsible of doing something)
and as such it is much better to use er and ing.

Comment if needed.
Stef