"Bill Schwab" <
[hidden email]> wrote in message
news:cmgbm4$leu$
[hidden email]...
> Blair,
>
> I just categorized a method named #baudRate, and was offered **compiled
> accessors** as a choice. That is prbably because the name agrees with a
> compiled accessor in Ian's DCB class.
>
> I leave it to you to decide whether this is a failure of virtual
> categories, or something harmless to be ignored, or both :)
'**compiled accessors**' is a standard (non-virtual) category, and so
(unfortunately) eligible for suggestion by the default categorisation
policy. I think it would make sense to treat it as a special case, however.
Thanks
Blair
Locked
