Hi all,
since the build #111 there is a new version of iceberg. I'll let Esteban get into the details of that. From what respects to me, this build fixes 9 failing tests: The build has however one failing test that fails randomly: Denis has proposed a solution for that, so we will have a green build back soon :)
|
But this SemaphoreTest is not mine :). Now I only improve MutexTest 2017-09-11 17:09 GMT+02:00 Guillermo Polito <[hidden email]>:
|
Ahh It's a different one! On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Denis Kudriashov <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
I add another push request 2017-09-11 17:16 GMT+02:00 Guillermo Polito <[hidden email]>:
|
Thanks you guys!!! On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Denis Kudriashov <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
If we can keep it green each day with a new build number will
be a release day ;) Have fun T. Gesendet: Montag, 11. September 2017 um 18:23 Uhr Von: "Stephane Ducasse" <[hidden email]> An: "Pharo Development List" <[hidden email]> Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Build #111 Thanks you guys!!! On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Denis Kudriashov <[hidden email][mailto:[hidden email]]> wrote: I add another push request 2017-09-11 17:16 GMT+02:00 Guillermo Polito <[hidden email][mailto:[hidden email]]>: Ahh It's a different one! On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Denis Kudriashov <[hidden email][mailto:[hidden email]]> wrote: But this SemaphoreTest is not mine :). Now I only improve MutexTest 2017-09-11 17:09 GMT+02:00 Guillermo Polito <[hidden email][mailto:[hidden email]]>: Hi all, since the build #111 there is a new version of iceberg. I'll let Esteban get into the details of that. From what respects to me, this build fixes 9 failing tests: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/267[https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/267] The build has however one failing test that fails randomly: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%20and%20branch%20Pipeline/job/development/[https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%20and%20branch%20Pipeline/job/development/] Kernel.Tests.Processes.SemaphoreTest.testMutualExclusion[https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%20and%20branch%20Pipeline/job/development/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/Kernel.Tests.Processes/SemaphoreTest/testMutualExclusion/] Denis has proposed a solution for that, so we will have a green build back soon :) -- Guille Polito Research Engineer French National Center for Scientific Research - http://www.cnrs.fr[http://www.cnrs.fr] Web: http://guillep.github.io[http://guillep.github.io] Phone: +33 06 52 70 66 13 -- Guille Polito Research Engineer French National Center for Scientific Research - http://www.cnrs.fr[http://www.cnrs.fr] Web: http://guillep.github.io[http://guillep.github.io] Phone: +33 06 52 70 66 13 |
In reply to this post by Guillermo Polito
What Iceberg changes will get ported to Pharo 6?
Stephan |
hi,
for now, everything, at least 0.5.* series (but I want to port 0.6 too because of tonel and windows users) Esteban > On 13 Sep 2017, at 14:07, stephan <[hidden email]> wrote: > > What Iceberg changes will get ported to Pharo 6? > > Stephan > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |