Administrator
|
Didn't there used to be a button?
Cheers,
Sean |
Administrator
|
Hmm... I found it in the method pane's context menu. What is the rationale for the change?
Cheers,
Sean |
> On 01 Apr 2015, at 17:06, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hmm... I found it in the method pane's context menu. What is the rationale > for the change? > That it is a feature only used by compiler writers or in very special circumstances where knowing a shortcut should be fine. Keep in mind that everything in the UI on the first level you have to explain to a learner *and* there has to be a use case why having it is important. Marcus |
Administrator
|
> Keep in mind that everything in the UI on the first level you have to explain to a learner
> *and* there has to be a use case why having it is important. Very good reason! Thanks for the explanation :)
Cheers,
Sean |
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4
+ 1000000000
Le 1/4/15 17:26, Marcus Denker a écrit : >> On 01 Apr 2015, at 17:06, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Hmm... I found it in the method pane's context menu. What is the rationale >> for the change? >> > That it is a feature only used by compiler writers or in very special circumstances > where knowing a shortcut should be fine. > > Keep in mind that everything in the UI on the first level you have to explain to a learner > *and* there has to be a use case why having it is important. > > Marcus > > |
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4
> On Apr 1, 2015, at 12:26, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote: > > >> On 01 Apr 2015, at 17:06, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Hmm... I found it in the method pane's context menu. What is the rationale >> for the change? >> > > That it is a feature only used by compiler writers or in very special circumstances > where knowing a shortcut should be fine. > > Keep in mind that everything in the UI on the first level you have to explain to a learner > *and* there has to be a use case why having it is important. Yes, a big +1 on removing it. ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <--- Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile |
In reply to this post by Sean P. DeNigris
Seemingly, UI-wise, it was not good to have a button for the bytecode. As I use it al the time, I reintroduced it in the menu and you can use the shortcut Cmd+b+b, which reportedly was better. In other IDE tools that nautilus you can't see anymore the bytecodes though. 2015-04-01 8:06 GMT-07:00 Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]>: Hmm... I found it in the method pane's context menu. What is the rationale |
Yes, removing it from the menu was not a good idea...
Yes, we need to streamline all the tools: We need these things to have *one* definition: adding it once should add it to all tools.
|
not necessarily. It should be possible to customise.
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |