Chris,
> Does anyone else find it a nuisance that the go-search bar in a CHB
> (or similar) displays all the methods as well as classnames ?
>
> E.g. I type
> Scroll
> into it, then I see ScrollBar loads of ScrollBar's methods, rather
> than having ScrollingDecorator (which is what I was really looking
> for, although I'd forgotten its full name) immediately come into view.
>
> Will raise this as an ER if anyone else agrees.
The original idea being the go-search was for it to be able to find
objects other than just classes. We wanted it to be a bit like the song
search in ITunes if you know that and ideally, it would also do a free
text search at the same time but this would be rather tricky and
require indices to be built etc etc.
I understand the problem. I suggested at one point that we reorder the
autocompletion list so that all classes were grouped together, followed
by methods. This would allow classes to be found quickly and even a
partial autocompletion to get the classname in there before carrying on
and typing the rest of a method name if required.
The problem with this is that Scintill apparently has retrictions on
the contents of the autocompletion drop-down. I believe that the
contents must be alphabetically sorted otherwise it gets confused.
In the end I'd rather keep the search as it is than revert back to a
simple class search. I suppose Class/Find could be restored as a
separate function if people are that desparate.
--
Andy Bower
Dolphin Support
www.object-arts.com