Smalltalk › Frameworks & Tools › SciSmalltalk

CI INRIA is back to work

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

9 messages Options

SergeStinckwich

CI INRIA is back to work

Hi all,

the CI builds are running again at INRIA :
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/SciSmalltalk/

Apparently there 4 failures for stable and unstable versions, related
to Matrix and random numbers.

Regards,
--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

werner kassens-2

Re: CI INRIA is back to work

Hi Serge,
i will correct the matrix problems. have not yet looked at it but i suppose that monticello again lost a method or so by saving a package. lately this happens often to me and i regularly forget to double-check this as it is a bit annoying..
werner.

On Thursday, April 24, 2014 6:26:10 PM UTC+2, Serge Stinckwich wrote:

Hi all,

the CI builds are running again at INRIA :
<a href="https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/SciSmalltalk/" target="_blank" onmousedown="this.href='https://www.google.com/url?q\75https%3A%2F%2Fci.inria.fr%2Fpharo-contribution%2Fjob%2FSciSmalltalk%2F\46sa\75D\46sntz\0751\46usg\75AFQjCNEdMDSeydARmqOAhmqEwBdSfjxg5g';return true;" onclick="this.href='https://www.google.com/url?q\75https%3A%2F%2Fci.inria.fr%2Fpharo-contribution%2Fjob%2FSciSmalltalk%2F\46sa\75D\46sntz\0751\46usg\75AFQjCNEdMDSeydARmqOAhmqEwBdSfjxg5g';return true;">https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/SciSmalltalk/

Apparently there 4 failures for stable and unstable versions, related
to Matrix and random numbers.

Regards,
--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
<a href="http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/" target="_blank" onmousedown="this.href='http://www.google.com/url?q\75http%3A%2F%2Fwww.doesnotunderstand.org%2F\46sa\75D\46sntz\0751\46usg\75AFQjCNEmratUCplMDry5gDXSals1R-iPLw';return true;" onclick="this.href='http://www.google.com/url?q\75http%3A%2F%2Fwww.doesnotunderstand.org%2F\46sa\75D\46sntz\0751\46usg\75AFQjCNEmratUCplMDry5gDXSals1R-iPLw';return true;">http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

werner kassens-2

Re: CI INRIA is back to work

it is as i thought; if you look at the 'browse diff ' of Math-DHB-NumericalExtensions in smalltalkhub youll notice that i did not delete at:at:, but if you load it, at:at: and some other methods are gone. this monticello behaviour is slightly disturbing <stupid grin>.
werner

On Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:50:44 PM UTC+2, werner kassens wrote:

have not yet looked at it but i suppose that monticello again lost a method or so by saving a package. lately this happens often to me and i regularly forget to double-check this as it is a bit annoying..
werner.

werner kassens-2

Re: CI INRIA is back to work

Hi,
i have a little problem: i download the stable version for pharo 0.2 from https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/SciSmalltalk/. in the package Math-DHB-Numerical i look at DHBMatrix, it has no extension-protocol. i look in the monticello-browser: Math-DHB-NumericalExtensions(WernerKassens.3) is loaded. i open the smalltalkhub repository and look at the difference to Math-DHB-NumericalExtensions(WernerKassens.3), which is exactly the version in the image, and i see differences. i load Math-DHB-NumericalExtensions(WernerKassens.3) a second time and now the extensions in DHBMatrix are there!? i guess i should have a second look at this tomorrow or perhaps somebody wants to give me a hint, why i dont understand this?
werner

werner kassens-2

Re: CI INRIA is back to work

ah, now i got it, i will repair that tomorrow.

werner

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:27 PM, werner kassens <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,
i have a little problem: i download the stable version for pharo 0.2 from https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/SciSmalltalk/. in the package Math-DHB-Numerical i look at DHBMatrix, it has no extension-protocol. i look in the monticello-browser: Math-DHB-NumericalExtensions(WernerKassens.3) is loaded. i open the smalltalkhub repository and look at the difference to Math-DHB-NumericalExtensions(WernerKassens.3), which is exactly the version in the image, and i see differences. i load Math-DHB-NumericalExtensions(WernerKassens.3) a second time and now the extensions in DHBMatrix are there!? i guess i should have a second look at this tomorrow or perhaps somebody wants to give me a hint, why i dont understand this?
werner

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Nicolas Cellier

Re: CI INRIA is back to work

In reply to this post by SergeStinckwich

I see, I'm responsible for the randomness, #microsecondClockValue is not understood in 2.0...

I only tested in 3.0 :(

I will post an update.

2014-04-24 18:26 GMT+02:00 Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]>:

Hi all,

the CI builds are running again at INRIA :
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/SciSmalltalk/

Apparently there 4 failures for stable and unstable versions, related
to Matrix and random numbers.

Regards,
--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

SergeStinckwich

Re: CI INRIA is back to work

Maybe we should drop support for Pharo 2.0 because now Pharo 3.0 is almost out.

Envoyé de mon iPhone

Le 25 avr. 2014 à 06:28, Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]> a écrit :

I see, I'm responsible for the randomness, #microsecondClockValue is not understood in 2.0...
I only tested in 3.0 :(
I will post an update.

2014-04-24 18:26 GMT+02:00 Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]>:
Hi all,

the CI builds are running again at INRIA :
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/SciSmalltalk/

Apparently there 4 failures for stable and unstable versions, related
to Matrix and random numbers.

Regards,
--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

SergeStinckwich

Re: CI INRIA is back to work

Thank you all, we are back on track.
All the tests are green ;-)

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/SciSmalltalk/

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Serge Stinckwich
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Maybe we should drop support for Pharo 2.0 because now Pharo 3.0 is almost
> out.
>
> Envoyé de mon iPhone
>
> Le 25 avr. 2014 à 06:28, Nicolas Cellier
> <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>
> I see, I'm responsible for the randomness, #microsecondClockValue is not
> understood in 2.0...
> I only tested in 3.0 :(
> I will post an update.
>
>
> 2014-04-24 18:26 GMT+02:00 Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]>:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> the CI builds are running again at INRIA :
>> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/SciSmalltalk/
>>
>> Apparently there 4 failures for stable and unstable versions, related
>> to Matrix and random numbers.
>>
>> Regards,
>> --
>> Serge Stinckwich
>> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
>> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
>> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "SciSmalltalk" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [hidden email].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "SciSmalltalk" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [hidden email].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

werner kassens-2

Re: CI INRIA is back to work

In reply to this post by SergeStinckwich

Maybe we should drop support for Pharo 2.0 because now Pharo 3.0 is almost out.

Hi Serge,
i'd prefer, if we are not too fast. if i wouldnt know anything about SciSmalltalk, i wouldnt look at that jenkins thing, but would load SciSmalltalk into a stable pharo, and if the tests are red, i'd think, ok, old code, not maintained anymore, and throw it away. interesting example and nice picture of the lorenz attractor btw.
werner