I need call executable files of OS. I see various options, but I´m not sure. I believe don´t understand correctly.
I need: -Call executable files from system. -Call associated programs of links, for example, I could pass 'http://google.com'. The result must be open the default browser of user with that link. -Call commands or .BATs files from OS. -I need use that on any OS, must be cross-platform, is very important. If that is not implemented on Pharo, is possible create a .exe file with another language, where I call functions of OS, and invoke from Smalltalk that exe? Regards. |
I think you will find that OS Process work on mac an Linux and NOT on Windows, but ProcessWrapper does work there. A test on the OS should let you interchange them well enough to get by.
Bill ________________________________________ From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of nullPointer [[hidden email]] Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 1:19 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: [Pharo-project] Call a external executable file. What is the best option? I need call executable files of OS. I see various options, but I´m not sure. I believe don´t understand correctly. I need: -Call executable files from system. -Call associated programs of links, for example, I could pass 'http://google.com'. The result must be open the default browser of user with that link. -Call commands or .BATs files from OS. -I need use that on any OS, must be cross-platform, is very important. If that is not implemented on Pharo, is possible create a .exe file with another language, where I call functions of OS, and invoke from Smalltalk that exe? Regards. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Call-a-external-executable-file-What-is-the-best-option-tp3303894p3303894.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
I asked something similar a while back. I've pasted the contents of that discussion below. Max --- begin pasted discussion --- On 13.12.2010, at 09:54, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: Guys we should create a nice documentation for the OSProcess please please spend some time on the collabactive book because we need more documentation. Stef On Dec 12, 2010, at 6:34 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: OSProcess, which I am learning to like more as I learn more about it, is not well supported on Windows. Dave recently advised me to use ProcessWrapper on Windows; if he is saying that, then it must be the better path for now. I have done FFI on both Windows and Linux. I have not (yet anyway) done any one task in a cross-platform way. So far, I have not seen anything horrible that would prevent it. I have zero interest (at least so far) in moving my numerical analysis adventures back toward Windows (they started there and moved to Linux where I am quite happy). I have a .so interface to Acces IO A/D hardware and a DLL interface to Ascension Technology's 3D tracking software. Ultimately, I hope to be able to use both of them on either platform (the software exists on both), but have not yet made the connections. I transparently use OutputDebugString() on Linux and syslog() on Linux, but that does a test on platform and calls completely different code, so it does not count here. Sorry I can't be of more help. I urge you to wade into it and ask for help as you get stuck. For creating libraries, you might want to have a look at Code::Blocks; I don't push it very hard, but I have no complaints. The "default" is to install MinGW on Windows (last time I looked at least) and it uses gcc on Linux. Bill ________________________________________ From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli [[hidden email]] Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 11:43 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Is executing a file platform dependent? With OS Process you can run scripts. That should work identical on Mac and Unix systems; probably also Windows, but I haven't tried. With FFI and Alien you can call C libraries. I have not much experience with those, but normally it should be possible to use them on all platforms. Lukas On 12 December 2010 17:31, Max Leske <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi guys I was wondering if it is true that executing a file from within Pharo is platform dependent. I don't actually need to execute a file; it's more a theoretical question and I have no idea what the mechanisms are that would be used. To give you a clearer picture: Imagine you have C, sh, and perl files. What I'm thinking about is that I would have some data in the image that I would want to process with the code in one of those files. I would then wait for the result and process the result in the image. So my questions are: is there a platform independent way to execute C, sh or perl files from Pharo? Does the VM handle the platform dependencies? Are there any other issues with the idea I described? Don't go out of your way to find answers, please. But I'd be happy to hear your thoughts. Cheers, Max -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch On 13.02.2011, at 19:20, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |