Maybe I even would like to remove the whole package 'ST80-Paths'.....but, going step by step, I would remove Arc, Circle and Spline. As far as I could see, they don't have more senders than their own examples. And they are not even working. For example, Arc and Circule shows the same. Evaluate:
Arc example Circle example Spline example So, what do you think? We break everything if we do this? opinions? Maybe we can put them in PharoMorphicExtras :) Cheers Mariano _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Hi Mariano,
I use them in Mondrian. I haven't found a better way to draw splines and arcs without these classes. Cheers, Alexandre On 19 Jan 2010, at 07:20, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Maybe I even would like to remove the whole package 'ST80- > Paths'.....but, going step by step, I would remove Arc, Circle and > Spline. As far as I could see, they don't have more senders than > their own examples. And they are not even working. For example, Arc > and Circule shows the same. Evaluate: > > Arc example > Circle example > Spline example > > So, what do you think? We break everything if we do this? opinions? > > Maybe we can put them in PharoMorphicExtras :) > > Cheers > > Mariano > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
However, I am okay to have them in a separate package.
Alexandre On 19 Jan 2010, at 07:20, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Maybe I even would like to remove the whole package 'ST80- > Paths'.....but, going step by step, I would remove Arc, Circle and > Spline. As far as I could see, they don't have more senders than > their own examples. And they are not even working. For example, Arc > and Circule shows the same. Evaluate: > > Arc example > Circle example > Spline example > > So, what do you think? We break everything if we do this? opinions? > > Maybe we can put them in PharoMorphicExtras :) > > Cheers > > Mariano > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Alexandre Bergel
2010/1/19 Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]>:
> Hi Mariano, > > I use them in Mondrian. I haven't found a better way to draw splines > and arcs without these classes. > Bezier curves? > Cheers, > Alexandre > > On 19 Jan 2010, at 07:20, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > >> Maybe I even would like to remove the whole package 'ST80- >> Paths'.....but, going step by step, I would remove Arc, Circle and >> Spline. As far as I could see, they don't have more senders than >> their own examples. And they are not even working. For example, Arc >> and Circule shows the same. Evaluate: >> >> Arc example >> Circle example >> Spline example >> >> So, what do you think? We break everything if we do this? opinions? >> >> Maybe we can put them in PharoMorphicExtras :) >> >> Cheers >> >> Mariano >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Alexandre Bergel
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote: However, I am okay to have them in a separate package. Yes, I would really prefer this option is nobody discover that they are really needed in the core. I would like to hear other opinions, thus. BTW, you usually build your Moose images based in PharoCore or PharoDev? Cheers Mariano
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
In reply to this post by Igor Stasenko
>> I use them in Mondrian. I haven't found a better way to draw splines
>> and arcs without these classes. >> > Bezier curves? Maybe. I haven't checked the formulas carefully. Maybe Splines are a bit different then bezier. Alexandre > >> Cheers, >> Alexandre >> >> On 19 Jan 2010, at 07:20, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >> >>> Maybe I even would like to remove the whole package 'ST80- >>> Paths'.....but, going step by step, I would remove Arc, Circle and >>> Spline. As far as I could see, they don't have more senders than >>> their own examples. And they are not even working. For example, Arc >>> and Circule shows the same. Evaluate: >>> >>> Arc example >>> Circle example >>> Spline example >>> >>> So, what do you think? We break everything if we do this? opinions? >>> >>> Maybe we can put them in PharoMorphicExtras :) >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Mariano >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko AKA sig. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
> BTW, you usually build your Moose images based in PharoCore or
> PharoDev? On PharoDev. But things may change if O2 remains outside the image. Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Fernando olivero
> In moose page it says:"the same version can also be loaded into a
> Pharo Development image by executing the following code: > Gofer new > squeaksource: 'Moose'; > addPackage: 'ConfigurationOfMoose'; > load. > ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfMoose) > project version: '4.0-beta.4') load. " The squeaksource moose page says: Gofer new squeaksource: 'Moose'; package: 'ConfigurationOfMoose'; load. (Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfMoose) perform: #loadDefault Alexandre > > > > On Jan 19, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email] >> > wrote: >> However, I am okay to have them in a separate package. >> >> >> Yes, I would really prefer this option is nobody discover that they >> are really needed in the core. I would like to hear other opinions, >> thus. >> >> BTW, you usually build your Moose images based in PharoCore or >> PharoDev? >> >> Cheers >> >> Mariano >> >> Alexandre >> >> >> On 19 Jan 2010, at 07:20, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >> >> > Maybe I even would like to remove the whole package 'ST80- >> > Paths'.....but, going step by step, I would remove Arc, Circle and >> > Spline. As far as I could see, they don't have more senders than >> > their own examples. And they are not even working. For example, Arc >> > and Circule shows the same. Evaluate: >> > >> > Arc example >> > Circle example >> > Spline example >> > >> > So, what do you think? We break everything if we do this? >> opinions? >> > >> > Maybe we can put them in PharoMorphicExtras :) >> > >> > Cheers >> > >> > Mariano >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Pharo-project mailing list >> > [hidden email] >> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> <ATT00001..txt> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Alexandre Bergel
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi Mariano, > > I use them in Mondrian. I haven't found a better way to draw splines > and arcs without these classes. You could use the Balloon Canvas or Rome API. Michael _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Alexandre Bergel
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:
I was asking mostly because in the default Dev images the extra morph package was loaded...so maybe moving there was a good idea. Regarding O2, it will be outside until it doesn't break OB. The good news is that (you already know that) yesterday I received an email from David telling me that you were working on that. I was going to release a new Dev image, but I will wait to see if O2 is ready to be included. So far, yesterday I reported a couple of bugs to David. Keep me informed about the progress (which so far, in one day was excellent, as I could load O2 in a core image without OB!!!) Cheers Mariano
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Alexandre Bergel
Splines and Beziers are the same thing. With what i did for SVGMorph stuff,
arcs can only be approximated by splines... nothing to stop you extending BalloonCanvas to draw arcs using the code from Arc though... Regards, Gary ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexandre Bergel" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 1:16 PM Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Can we remove Arc, Circle and Spline ? >>> I use them in Mondrian. I haven't found a better way to draw splines >>> and arcs without these classes. >>> >> Bezier curves? > > Maybe. I haven't checked the formulas carefully. Maybe Splines are a > bit different then bezier. > > Alexandre > >> >>> Cheers, >>> Alexandre >>> >>> On 19 Jan 2010, at 07:20, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >>> >>>> Maybe I even would like to remove the whole package 'ST80- >>>> Paths'.....but, going step by step, I would remove Arc, Circle and >>>> Spline. As far as I could see, they don't have more senders than >>>> their own examples. And they are not even working. For example, Arc >>>> and Circule shows the same. Evaluate: >>>> >>>> Arc example >>>> Circle example >>>> Spline example >>>> >>>> So, what do you think? We break everything if we do this? opinions? >>>> >>>> Maybe we can put them in PharoMorphicExtras :) >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> Mariano >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Igor Stasenko AKA sig. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
> Regarding O2, it will be outside until it doesn't break OB. The good
> news is that (you already know that) yesterday I received an email > from David telling me that you were working on that. I was going to > release a new Dev image, but I will wait to see if O2 is ready to be > included. So far, yesterday I reported a couple of bugs to David. > > Keep me informed about the progress (which so far, in one day was > excellent, as I could load O2 in a core image without OB!!!) Yeah, we will work on this this afternoon Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Michael Rueger-6
>> I use them in Mondrian. I haven't found a better way to draw splines
>> and arcs without these classes. > > You could use the Balloon Canvas or Rome API. I should have a look at this yes. Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Gary Chambers-4
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Gary Chambers wrote:
> Splines and Beziers are the same thing. With what i did for SVGMorph stuff, Not exactly. Bezier splines are splines, but not all splines are Bezier splines. Levente > arcs can only be approximated by splines... nothing to stop you extending > BalloonCanvas to draw arcs using the code from Arc though... > > Regards, Gary > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alexandre Bergel" <[hidden email]> > To: <[hidden email]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 1:16 PM > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Can we remove Arc, Circle and Spline ? > > >>>> I use them in Mondrian. I haven't found a better way to draw splines >>>> and arcs without these classes. >>>> >>> Bezier curves? >> >> Maybe. I haven't checked the formulas carefully. Maybe Splines are a >> bit different then bezier. >> >> Alexandre >> >>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Alexandre >>>> >>>> On 19 Jan 2010, at 07:20, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >>>> >>>>> Maybe I even would like to remove the whole package 'ST80- >>>>> Paths'.....but, going step by step, I would remove Arc, Circle and >>>>> Spline. As far as I could see, they don't have more senders than >>>>> their own examples. And they are not even working. For example, Arc >>>>> and Circule shows the same. Evaluate: >>>>> >>>>> Arc example >>>>> Circle example >>>>> Spline example >>>>> >>>>> So, what do you think? We break everything if we do this? opinions? >>>>> >>>>> Maybe we can put them in PharoMorphicExtras :) >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> Mariano >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>> >>>> -- >>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Igor Stasenko AKA sig. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
You are correct, of course. For the purposes of this comparison I think they
can be treated the same. Regards, Gary ----- Original Message ----- From: "Levente Uzonyi" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 2:15 PM Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Can we remove Arc, Circle and Spline ? > On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Gary Chambers wrote: > >> Splines and Beziers are the same thing. With what i did for SVGMorph >> stuff, > > Not exactly. Bezier splines are splines, but not all splines are Bezier > splines. > > > Levente > >> arcs can only be approximated by splines... nothing to stop you extending >> BalloonCanvas to draw arcs using the code from Arc though... >> >> Regards, Gary >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Alexandre Bergel" <[hidden email]> >> To: <[hidden email]> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 1:16 PM >> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Can we remove Arc, Circle and Spline ? >> >> >>>>> I use them in Mondrian. I haven't found a better way to draw splines >>>>> and arcs without these classes. >>>>> >>>> Bezier curves? >>> >>> Maybe. I haven't checked the formulas carefully. Maybe Splines are a >>> bit different then bezier. >>> >>> Alexandre >>> >>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Alexandre >>>>> >>>>> On 19 Jan 2010, at 07:20, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Maybe I even would like to remove the whole package 'ST80- >>>>>> Paths'.....but, going step by step, I would remove Arc, Circle and >>>>>> Spline. As far as I could see, they don't have more senders than >>>>>> their own examples. And they are not even working. For example, Arc >>>>>> and Circule shows the same. Evaluate: >>>>>> >>>>>> Arc example >>>>>> Circle example >>>>>> Spline example >>>>>> >>>>>> So, what do you think? We break everything if we do this? opinions? >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe we can put them in PharoMorphicExtras :) >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> Mariano >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best regards, >>>> Igor Stasenko AKA sig. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
Hi mariano
I think that for now they are easy to fix in case of problem. I suggest that we concentrate efforts on some ugly one like project and deepInner.... FileDirectory.... Stef On Jan 19, 2010, at 11:20 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Maybe I even would like to remove the whole package 'ST80-Paths'.....but, going step by step, I would remove Arc, Circle and Spline. As far as I could see, they don't have more senders than their own examples. And they are not even working. For example, Arc and Circule shows the same. Evaluate: > > Arc example > Circle example > Spline example > > So, what do you think? We break everything if we do this? opinions? > > Maybe we can put them in PharoMorphicExtras :) > > Cheers > > Mariano > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Ok...No problem. I have just arrive to them looking for stuff related with ImageSegment (no, they were not related to ImageSegment) and then, I tried to understood those classes and I noticed that nobody use them inside the core...and thus, that's why I asked.
Cheers Mariano On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi mariano _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |