Hey!
Will somebody start yelling at me if I modify the buttons of system browsers (and code holders) like this: :D Best, Marcel |
I like that. I was actually experimenting with the same for the ZipArchive tool :-) Karl On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Marcel Taeumel <[hidden email]> wrote: Hey! |
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 9:12 AM, karl ramberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I like that. If you're referring to the | Instance | Class | |?| buttons, I kind of do too.. :) > I was actually experimenting with the same for the ZipArchive tool :-) > > Karl > > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Marcel Taeumel > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Hey! >> >> Will somebody start yelling at me if I modify the buttons of system >> browsers >> (and code holders) like this: >> >> <http://forum.world.st/file/n4823991/new-button-order.png> >> >> :D >> >> Best, >> Marcel >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/Changing-button-groups-order-in-browsers-tp4823991.html >> Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > > |
While we're at it, can we change the round source button? Make it look like the others, but maybe with a downwards triangle or some such to indicate it's actually a dropdown? or make it actually look like a drop down? Now it just looks out of place
|
I was wondering about the senders and implementors buttons. It would be nice to be able to chose either local or global scope. I'm not sure we have a nice button widget that can do that. Karl On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 2:41 PM, timfelgentreff <[hidden email]> wrote: While we're at it, can we change the round source button? Make it look like |
Dropdown /split button I guess is the name of said button On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:28 PM, karl ramberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
In reply to this post by Karl Ramberg
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 9:28 AM, karl ramberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I was wondering about the senders and implementors buttons. It would be nice > to be able to chose either local or global scope. I'm not sure we have a > nice button widget that can do that. Currently those buttons open a list of implementors with one click but which can be subsequently filtered via "filter message list..." | "messages that...". Then, in the dialog, simply enter the expression how you want to filter. |
Oh, I was not aware of these possibilities. It seem very powerful, but I must say I'm a little lost since I really don't know how to phrase these searches. There is so much to learn :-) Karl On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote: On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 9:28 AM, karl ramberg <[hidden email]> wrote: |
There may be room for improving the usability here. ;-) Best, Marcel Von: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Im Auftrag von karl ramberg Oh, I was not aware of these possibilities. It seem very powerful, but I must say I'm a little lost since I really don't know how to phrase these searches. There is so much to learn :-) Karl On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
In reply to this post by Karl Ramberg
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:20 AM, karl ramberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Oh, I was not aware of these possibilities. > It seem very powerful, but I must say I'm a little lost since I really don't > know how to phrase these searches. So for that local-scope filter you mentioned, say you wanted to filter implementors which are local to the Collection hierarchy, so it would be the ones which #inheritsFrom: Collection. [:aClass :aSelector | aClass inheritsFrom: Collection ] #inheritsFrom: seems to be the one I use most often from that "messages that..." function. > There is so much to learn :-) After using Squeak for so long, I also get amazed sometimes when I discover old things that have been there for a long time which I didn't know.. :) |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |