Hi,
Circle seems to be gone from Pharo 1.3. What is now the preferred way to specify a circle? Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "When people care, great things can happen." |
I also bumped into the same problem. For the case of Mondrian, I will copy the missing classes into Mondrian.
These classes were removed quite some times ago from Pharo 1.3 Cheers, Alexandre On 18 May 2011, at 08:54, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi, > > Circle seems to be gone from Pharo 1.3. > > What is now the preferred way to specify a circle? > > Cheers, > Doru > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "When people care, great things can happen." > > > > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. |
I guess there was a reason behind removing them, and I also guess that the best way would be to find what is the other preferred solution besides adding them back :). Or was there removal a mistake?
Cheers, Doru On 18 May 2011, at 16:08, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > I also bumped into the same problem. For the case of Mondrian, I will copy the missing classes into Mondrian. > These classes were removed quite some times ago from Pharo 1.3 > > Cheers, > Alexandre > > > On 18 May 2011, at 08:54, Tudor Girba wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Circle seems to be gone from Pharo 1.3. >> >> What is now the preferred way to specify a circle? >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "When people care, great things can happen." >> >> >> >> > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go." |
There is no user of these classes in a 1.2. And nobody shouted against its removal.
This was a reason good enough to remove them :-) Alexandre On 18 May 2011, at 10:36, Tudor Girba wrote: > I guess there was a reason behind removing them, and I also guess that the best way would be to find what is the other preferred solution besides adding them back :). Or was there removal a mistake? > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 18 May 2011, at 16:08, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> I also bumped into the same problem. For the case of Mondrian, I will copy the missing classes into Mondrian. >> These classes were removed quite some times ago from Pharo 1.3 >> >> Cheers, >> Alexandre >> >> >> On 18 May 2011, at 08:54, Tudor Girba wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Circle seems to be gone from Pharo 1.3. >>> >>> What is now the preferred way to specify a circle? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Doru >>> >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "When people care, great things can happen." >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go." > > > > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. |
Hmm, I did not see the discussion.
So, does it mean that we should rescue the old classes and put them in a separate package? Cheers, Doru On 18 May 2011, at 16:42, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > There is no user of these classes in a 1.2. And nobody shouted against its removal. > This was a reason good enough to remove them :-) > > Alexandre > > > On 18 May 2011, at 10:36, Tudor Girba wrote: > >> I guess there was a reason behind removing them, and I also guess that the best way would be to find what is the other preferred solution besides adding them back :). Or was there removal a mistake? >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> On 18 May 2011, at 16:08, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> >>> I also bumped into the same problem. For the case of Mondrian, I will copy the missing classes into Mondrian. >>> These classes were removed quite some times ago from Pharo 1.3 >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Alexandre >>> >>> >>> On 18 May 2011, at 08:54, Tudor Girba wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Circle seems to be gone from Pharo 1.3. >>>> >>>> What is now the preferred way to specify a circle? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Doru >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> www.tudorgirba.com >>>> >>>> "When people care, great things can happen." >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go." >> >> >> >> > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Be rather willing to give than demanding to get." |
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hmm, I did not see the discussion. Can't find any thread or issue about it. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry |
There is an EllipseMorph and CircleMorph.
Also, if you wanna draw circles directly using canvas you can use #fillOval: fillStyle: borderWidth: borderColor: message sent to canvas. On 18 May 2011 17:04, Damien Cassou <[hidden email]> wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Hmm, I did not see the discussion. > > Can't find any thread or issue about it. > > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them > popular by not having them." James Iry > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. |
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba
What Circle?
CircleMorph? I do not see why it would be removed? Stef On May 18, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi, > > Circle seems to be gone from Pharo 1.3. > > What is now the preferred way to specify a circle? > > Cheers, > Doru > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "When people care, great things can happen." > > > > |
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba
On May 18, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hmm, I did not see the discussion. me neither. > > So, does it mean that we should rescue the old classes and put them in a separate package? > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 18 May 2011, at 16:42, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> There is no user of these classes in a 1.2. And nobody shouted against its removal. >> This was a reason good enough to remove them :-) >> >> Alexandre >> >> >> On 18 May 2011, at 10:36, Tudor Girba wrote: >> >>> I guess there was a reason behind removing them, and I also guess that the best way would be to find what is the other preferred solution besides adding them back :). Or was there removal a mistake? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Doru >>> >>> >>> On 18 May 2011, at 16:08, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>> >>>> I also bumped into the same problem. For the case of Mondrian, I will copy the missing classes into Mondrian. >>>> These classes were removed quite some times ago from Pharo 1.3 >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Alexandre >>>> >>>> >>>> On 18 May 2011, at 08:54, Tudor Girba wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Circle seems to be gone from Pharo 1.3. >>>>> >>>>> What is now the preferred way to specify a circle? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Doru >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> www.tudorgirba.com >>>>> >>>>> "When people care, great things can happen." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go." >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Be rather willing to give than demanding to get." > > > > |
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba
On May 18, 2011, at 8:08 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > What Circle? > Circle, from ST80... I think you removed it ;-) > CircleMorph? > I do not see why it would be removed? > > Stef > On May 18, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Circle seems to be gone from Pharo 1.3. >> >> What is now the preferred way to specify a circle? >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "When people care, great things can happen." >> >> >> >> > > -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. |
> What Circle?
>> > > Circle, from ST80... I think you removed it ;-) ahhhh that one? :) Doru why do you need that file? >> CircleMorph? >> I do not see why it would be removed? |
Hi,
We need it to represent the logic of paths in EyeSee and Mondrian. It's like Rectangle, only it's a Circle :). Cheers, Doru On 18 May 2011, at 21:03, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> What Circle? >>> >> >> Circle, from ST80... I think you removed it ;-) > > ahhhh that one? > :) > Doru why do you need that file? > >>> CircleMorph? >>> I do not see why it would be removed? -- www.tudorgirba.com "When people care, great things can happen." |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |