ClassFactoryForTestCase

Would it be fine if ClassFactoryForTestCase would silently create classes?

First of all, that class is awesome! However, it is sloooooow. It creates
 classes that are logged to the entire system, and when cleaning up goes to the
 length of cleaning up the log files. Creating anonymous classes would be
 faster. So I have two questions

- Any known users of that class that require the logging?
- What are the gotchas of anonymous classes?

cheers,
AA



-- 4th Workshop on Dynamic Languages and Applications
Submit papers by March 31, 2010. http://bit.ly/dyla2010


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Follow up.

Why is #compile: not silent? The method is only ever used in tests, where (as I
 would expect) logging of compilations is not what you want.

--AA



PS: I know there is #compileSilently:classified:notifying:, but if we know that
 compilation *without* classification and notification is only ever used in
 tests, why not pick the shortest possible name fro that so our tests are more
 readable?


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

because there is compile:Silently: and because the compiler is old but working.

On Dec 23, 2009, at 11:22 PM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project