Cleaning included Monticello repositories in PharoCore

> Hi folks:  I was thinking that at least for the 1.0 release we  
> should remove obsolete default repositories. I don't know if the  
> word is "default" but I mean to those repositories that are already  
> added when you download PharoCore 1.0 image.
>
> Those repositories are:
>
> 1) http://www.squeaksource.com/Pharo
> 2) http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoInbox
> 3) www.squeaksource.com/Installer
> 4) www.squeaksource.com/UIEnhancements
> 5) http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/flair
>
> 1) and 2) are ok.
> 3) I think we should remove it.
> 4) and 5) are there becuase Gofer and Polymorph are included in the  
> Core image?
>
> What do you think ?
>
> Cheers
>
> Mariano
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

>
> If Gofer and Polymorph are included in the Core image ... wouldn't it make
> more sense for those to be moved to those Pharo repositories then?
> --
> View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Cleaning-included-Monticello-repositories-in-PharoCore-tp1555481p1555830.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

> Hi folks:  I was thinking that at least for the 1.0 release we should remove obsolete default repositories. I don't know if the word is "default" but I mean to those repositories that are already added when you download PharoCore 1.0 image.
>
> Those repositories are:
>
> 1) http://www.squeaksource.com/Pharo
> 2) http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoInbox
> 3) www.squeaksource.com/Installer
> 4) www.squeaksource.com/UIEnhancements
> 5) http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/flair
>
> 1) and 2) are ok.  
> 3) I think we should remove it.
> 4) and 5) are there becuase Gofer and Polymorph are included in the Core image?
>
> What do you think ?
>
> Cheers
>
> Mariano
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

> Ok...thanks for the answers. Then we should keep only 1 and 2.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1967
>
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>>> 1) http://www.squeaksource.com/Pharo
>>> 2) http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoInbox
>>> 3) www.squeaksource.com/Installer
>>> 4) www.squeaksource.com/UIEnhancements
>>> 5) http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/flair
>>
>> I sugest to only keep 1 and 2.
>>
>> Lukas
>>
>> --
>> Lukas Renggli
>> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project