Code critics on FAMIX
Locked
 
|
Hi everyone.
Can someone tell me if there was any implementation of code critics-like framework on top of FAMIX? Regards. Yuriy _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
What do you mean exactly? Doru On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi everyone. "Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
No. I want to work with rules that can find common code smells, and so I wander if something similar is implemented already. Uko Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Cross-language code smells, or a framework to build a language specific code critic? I don't have either one, but the idea of a cross-languange code smell is interesting to me. -cbc
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Hi Chris.
The idea is a framework for defining and handling rules. For now on I want to try to implement something that works on FAMIX because it’s a well defined model which already has a lot of metrics implemented. We will see how it will work in future. I’d like to have it in Pharo on the same importance level as SUnit. Cheers. Uko On 21 Mar 2014, at 15:31, Chris Cunningham <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Well to do code critics, you would need to have some representation of the source code in Famix. Something like a Famix AST. hummmm .... somehow this reminds me of something ... ;-) For those that could not follow, I am hinting here at FAST (FAMIX-AST) a project that started with FAST-pharo implemented by no other than Yuriy Tymchuk. But seriously, I think that FAMIX is a bit high level to have many code critics rules. Andre had implemented some of the rules of smalllint on Famix using arki, but there are many statement level details that are missing to go very far. So I come back to my first answer, the solution seems to be FAST nicolas On 21/03/2014 16:45, Yuriy Tymchuk
wrote:
Hi Chris. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
On 21 Mar 2014, at 19:05, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]> wrote:
Yes, I know. That’s why it inspires me (because I can reuse my previous work). But I’m making sure that I won’t reimplement something already done. Cheers. Uko
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by Uko2
Arki is made for that isn’t it?
Alexandre On Mar 21, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi everyone. > > Can someone tell me if there was any implementation of code critics-like framework on top of FAMIX? > > Regards. > Yuriy > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
I will have a look.
Thank you. Uko On 21 Mar 2014, at 20:00, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote: > Arki is made for that isn’t it? > > Alexandre > > > On Mar 21, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi everyone. >> >> Can someone tell me if there was any implementation of code critics-like framework on top of FAMIX? >> >> Regards. >> Yuriy >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by Nicolas Anquetil
Is anyone working on FAST now? Uko On 21 Mar 2014, at 19:05, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Yes me I am working on Fast-Java, I did not suceed to implement it with PetitJava and I am trying to do something with SmaCC written by Thierry Goubier : https://github.com/ThierryGoubier/SmaCC/tree/master/SmaCC-Java.package. 2014-03-25 8:01 GMT+00:00 Uko2 [via Smalltalk] <[hidden email]>:
|
|
|
Hi Benjamin,
is the SmaCC-Java parser working as you would expect? I haven't got the time to do some significant testing on those parsers (C#, Java) yet; I just regenerated them from their grammar once I got the core code of SmaCC ported from Dolphin to Pharo3. Thierry Le 25/03/2014 09:16, Benjamin AREZKI a écrit : > Yes me I am working on Fast-Java, I did not suceed to implement it with > PetitJava and I am trying to do something with SmaCC written by Thierry > Goubier : > https://github.com/ThierryGoubier/SmaCC/tree/master/SmaCC-Java.package. > > > 2014-03-25 8:01 GMT+00:00 Uko2 [via Smalltalk] <[hidden email] > </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4750599&i=0>>: > > Is anyone working on FAST now? > > Uko > > On 21 Mar 2014, at 19:05, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email] > <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4750597&i=0>> wrote: > >> >> Well to do code critics, you would need to have some >> representation of the source code in Famix. >> Something like a Famix AST. >> >> hummmm .... >> >> somehow this reminds me of something ... >> >> ;-) >> >> >> For those that could not follow, I am hinting here at FAST >> (FAMIX-AST) a project that started with FAST-pharo implemented by >> no other than Yuriy Tymchuk. >> >> But seriously, I think that FAMIX is a bit high level to have many >> code critics rules. >> Andre had implemented some of the rules of smalllint on Famix >> using arki, but there are many statement level details that are >> missing to go very far. >> So I come back to my first answer, the solution seems to be FAST >> >> nicolas >> >> >> >> On 21/03/2014 16:45, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote: >>> Hi Chris. >>> >>> The idea is a framework for defining and handling rules. For now >>> on I want to try to implement something that works on FAMIX >>> because it’s a well defined model which already has a lot of >>> metrics implemented. We will see how it will work in future. I’d >>> like to have it in Pharo on the same importance level as SUnit. >>> >>> Cheers. >>> Uko >>> >>> On 21 Mar 2014, at 15:31, Chris Cunningham <[hidden email] >>> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4750597&i=1>> wrote: >>> >>>> Cross-language code smells, or a framework to build a language >>>> specific code critic? I don't have either one, but the idea of >>>> a cross-languange code smell is interesting to me. >>>> >>>> -cbc >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email] >>>> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4750597&i=2>> wrote: >>>> >>>> No. I want to work with rules that can find common code >>>> smells, and so I wander if something similar is implemented >>>> already. >>>> >>>> Uko >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On 21 Mar 2014, at 15:15, Tudor Girba <[hidden email] >>>> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4750597&i=3>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> What do you mean exactly? >>>>> >>>>> Doru >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden >>>>> email] >>>>> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4750597&i=4>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi everyone. >>>>> >>>>> Can someone tell me if there was any implementation of >>>>> code critics-like framework on top of FAMIX? >>>>> >>>>> Regards. >>>>> Yuriy >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4750597&i=5> >>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com/> >>>>> >>>>> "Every thing has its own flow" >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4750597&i=6> >>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4750597&i=7> >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4750597&i=8> >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4750597&i=9> >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4750597&i=10> >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4750597&i=11> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the > discussion below: > http://forum.world.st/Code-critics-on-FAMIX-tp4750181p4750597.html > To start a new topic under Moose, email [hidden email] > </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4750599&i=1> > To unsubscribe from Smalltalk, click here. > NAML > <http://forum.world.st/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > View this message in context: Re: Code critics on FAMIX > <http://forum.world.st/Code-critics-on-FAMIX-tp4750181p4750599.html> > Sent from the Moose mailing list archive > <http://forum.world.st/Moose-f1310756.html> at Nabble.com. > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > -- Thierry Goubier CEA list Laboratoire des Fondations des Systèmes Temps Réel Embarqués 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex France Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95 _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by Uko2
I worked on the generic resolution mechanisms I made some progress and am trying now to formalize what I learned and did in a coherent framework nicolas On 25/03/2014 08:58, Yuriy Tymchuk
wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
On 26 Mar 2014, at 11:01, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]> wrote:
I’ve seen that :) There is a method called #initScope in FAMIXContainerEntity. It’s overridden in FAMIXType, FAMIXBehaviouralEntity and FAMIXScopingEntity. All 4 methods are identical :). I think that I will help with this staff. I think that FAST deserves a good future. Now the thing is that maybe we should make some general scoping package and then include it separately in FAMIX and in FAST. Because not FAST in hacking FAMIX for scopes. Uko
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
thanks for pointing that but don't be too harsh on me, I am only a poor old researcher doing what he can that was evolving the idea as I develop the solution, really difficult I am trying to find time to put my ideas in a paper to formalize everything and then clean everything any help is welcome :-) nicolas On 26/03/2014 11:12, Yuriy Tymchuk
wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
On 26 Mar 2014, at 11:45, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]> wrote:
I’m not blaming you. Just giving some highlights as I start to fix things too. Uko
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by Uko2
Andre did something like expressing the rules in Famix to compare if this was possible.
On 21 Mar 2014, at 16:45, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by Benjamin AREZKI
Hi ben
this is cool to know because people here (anne and JC) are looking for a JavaAST framework. Stef On 25 Mar 2014, at 09:16, Benjamin AREZKI <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
«
Return to Moose
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |