Code stats - Aida vs. Seaside vs. Iliad

> Dear Iliaders,
>
> I made few measurements of code from three main Smalltalk web frameworks
> and results are now available at Google
> Docs:
> https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Atnb1W9vuq9ndG4wbUpxNXpKQnFZRlFyQXpHclhZa2c&hl=en#gid=1
>
> Here you'll find graphs of three distributions:
>
>  - number of methods in classes
>  - class inheritance depth
>  - number of lines in methods
>
> And also the following measurements:
>
>   Code stats               Aida  Seaside  Iliad
>   ----------------------------------------------
>   Nr of packages             1      74      9
>   Nr of categories          14     123     26
>   Nr of classes            145     943    265
>   Nr of methods           4.465   8.758  2.368
>   Lines of code          33.578  66.337  9.794
>   Avg methods/class        31      9       9
>   Avg lines/method        7,5     7,6     4,1
>
>   Nr of test methods       67     914     412
>   Avg tests/class         0,5      1      1,6
>
>   % of commented methods  45%     23%      5%
>   % of commented classes  32%     39%     13%
>
>
> Code is loaded in Pharo with by Metacello configurations, tests are
> included, all code included except Grease, Sport, Swazoo, Magritte.
>
> Let me say few words about the reason I started those measurements:
> mostly to find things to improve in Aida but I think results are
> interesting more broadly. Specially, because they seems to reveal two
> schools of thought about how to code in Smalltalk. Just compare the
> number of packages, classes and methods per class, then first two graphs
> about number of methods per class, and class inheritance depth.
>
> Quite interesting results and quite some food for discussion!
>
> Best regards
> Janko
>

> . and here is the code used for those measurements:
>
>    http://www.squeaksource.com/WebCodeStats.html
>
> Best regards
> Janko
>
> On 15. 11. 2010 13:13, Janko Mivšek wrote:
>> Dear Iliaders,
>>
>> I made few measurements of code from three main Smalltalk web frameworks
>> and results are now available at Google
>> Docs:
>> https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Atnb1W9vuq9ndG4wbUpxNXpKQnFZRlFyQXpHclhZa2c&hl=en#gid=1
>>
>> Here you'll find graphs of three distributions:
>>
>> - number of methods in classes
>> - class inheritance depth
>> - number of lines in methods
>>
>> And also the following measurements:
>>
>>  Code stats               Aida  Seaside  Iliad
>>  ----------------------------------------------
>>  Nr of packages             1      74      9
>>  Nr of categories          14     123     26
>>  Nr of classes            145     943    265
>>  Nr of methods           4.465   8.758  2.368
>>  Lines of code          33.578  66.337  9.794
>>  Avg methods/class        31      9       9
>>  Avg lines/method        7,5     7,6     4,1
>>
>>  Nr of test methods       67     914     412
>>  Avg tests/class         0,5      1      1,6
>>
>>  % of commented methods  45%     23%      5%
>>  % of commented classes  32%     39%     13%
>>
>>
>> Code is loaded in Pharo with by Metacello configurations, tests are
>> included, all code included except Grease, Sport, Swazoo, Magritte.
>>
>> Let me say few words about the reason I started those measurements:
>> mostly to find things to improve in Aida but I think results are
>> interesting more broadly. Specially, because they seems to reveal two
>> schools of thought about how to code in Smalltalk. Just compare the
>> number of packages, classes and methods per class, then first two graphs
>> about number of methods per class, and class inheritance depth.
>>
>> Quite interesting results and quite some food for discussion!
>>
>> Best regards
>> Janko
>>
>
> --
> Janko Mivšek
> Svetovalec za informatiko
> Eranova d.o.o.
> Ljubljana, Slovenija
> www.eranova.si
> tel:  01 514 22 55
> faks: 01 514 22 56
> gsm: 031 674 565

> (sorry if this becomes a duplicate)
>
> There was an error in the spreadsheet so that the first graph was
> wrong.  I made a copy and corrected the first 20 entries (the part
> graphed).  You can see it at:
>
> https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0ApTGwDtB7FUpdEcwVkxQT2tHUFppejNvQUhEZ2Z1eEE&hl=en
>
> Janko's comment about there seeming to be 2 different styles still
> stands.
>
> Also, 9 seems to be an unpopular number of methods per class :-).
>
> ../Dave
>