Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Users

Comanche on HTTPS

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

5 messages Options

Bernat Romagosa

Comanche on HTTPS

Hi list,

Is there a way to serve HTTPS via Comanche?

I can't use Zinc or Swazoo. Our app uses a version of Comanche that's pretty much hand-tailored for our needs, and switching would be quite a massive amount of work.

In case it's not currently supported, does someone know what would it take to implement it?

Thanks!

Bernat.

--
Bernat Romagosa.

Göran Krampe

Re: Comanche on HTTPS

On 10/17/2013 09:57 AM, Bernat Romagosa wrote:

> Hi list,
>
> Is there a way to serve HTTPS via Comanche?
>
> I can't use Zinc or Swazoo. Our app uses a version of Comanche that's
> pretty much hand-tailored for our needs, and switching would be quite a
> massive amount of work.
>
> In case it's not currently supported, does someone know what would it
> take to implement it?

Any reason you can't use say stud in front? stud is very small and just
does exactly what you want :)

https://github.com/bumptech/stud

regards, Göran

PS. Using SqueakSSL on server side does NOT scale.

Bernat Romagosa

Re: Comanche on HTTPS

The only reason is I didn't know about it!

I'll take a look at it, thanks a lot :)

Bernat.

2013/10/17 Göran Krampe <[hidden email]>

On 10/17/2013 09:57 AM, Bernat Romagosa wrote:

Hi list,

Is there a way to serve HTTPS via Comanche?

I can't use Zinc or Swazoo. Our app uses a version of Comanche that's
pretty much hand-tailored for our needs, and switching would be quite a
massive amount of work.

In case it's not currently supported, does someone know what would it
take to implement it?

Any reason you can't use say stud in front? stud is very small and just does exactly what you want :)

https://github.com/bumptech/stud

regards, Göran

PS. Using SqueakSSL on server side does NOT scale.

--
Bernat Romagosa.

Sven Van Caekenberghe-2

Re: Comanche on HTTPS

In reply to this post by Bernat Romagosa

Hi Bernat,

On 17 Oct 2013, at 09:57, Bernat Romagosa <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi list,
>
> Is there a way to serve HTTPS via Comanche?
>
> I can't use Zinc or Swazoo. Our app uses a version of Comanche that's pretty much hand-tailored for our needs, and switching would be quite a massive amount of work.
>
> In case it's not currently supported, does someone know what would it take to implement it?

Have a look at ZnSecureServer, in particular at ZnSecureServer>>#socketStreamOn:

Doing an #accept is basically all there is to it.

HTH,

Sven

PS: Note that such a server does only work on Linux.

> Thanks!
>
> Bernat.
>
> --
> Bernat Romagosa.

philippeback

Re: Comanche on HTTPS

In reply to this post by Göran Krampe

Wow, very useful thing!

This one joins 'pen' http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/lucid/man1/pen.1.html :-)

Phil

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Göran Krampe <[hidden email]> wrote:

On 10/17/2013 09:57 AM, Bernat Romagosa wrote:

Hi list,

Is there a way to serve HTTPS via Comanche?

I can't use Zinc or Swazoo. Our app uses a version of Comanche that's
pretty much hand-tailored for our needs, and switching would be quite a
massive amount of work.

In case it's not currently supported, does someone know what would it
take to implement it?

Any reason you can't use say stud in front? stud is very small and just does exactly what you want :)

https://github.com/bumptech/stud

regards, Göran

PS. Using SqueakSSL on server side does NOT scale.