>
> I am starting to port some code generating code of mine, and ran
> into something that (on Dolphin) uses Compiler class>>compile:in:,
> and the comment suggests that it creates a compiled method object
> without adding it to the class' method dictionary. Similar methods
> in Behavior do the same thing and then add the method to the
> dictionary.
>
> Are similar things happening in Pharo?
In principle, yes.
In this case:
-> it's not on the Class side of Compiler, but intance
-> the selector is compile:in:notifying:ifFail: (with a nice do-your
own exception handling)
> It looks that way to me, but an expert confirmation or warning would
> be appreciated.
> Hello Bill, I don't exactly understand what you are asking.
> However, if you want to know if there is methods to compile a source
> without adding the resulting CompiledMethod to the any class
> dictionary, the answer is yes, you can. You can do that, for
> example, by sending the message
> #compile:classified:notifying:trailer:ifFail:on:do: to any class.
Yes. But if you use the short form available for this in Behavior, e.g.
compile:
compile:notifying:
it *does* install the method. not good.
> You can also send messages to compile and add to the
> methodDictionary, you can browse the class Behavior to find what you
> want.
And rememeber to read the code...
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker -
http://marcusdenker.dePLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Locked
